「behavior」の検索結果

Suede-affiliated ethical application of behavioral science to marketing decisions, including framing, anchoring, social proof, loss aversion, choice architecture, and friction. Use when the user needs a named psychological model, an evidence-aware application, and a testable hypothesis. NOT FOR: clinical or mental-health advice, deceptive dark patterns, page implementation (use suede-site-alchemy), or pricing design (use suede-pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and update language-idiomatic doc comments for TypeScript (TSDoc/JSDoc) and Rust (Rustdoc). Use when asked to "add docs", "document this file", "generate docstrings", "add JSDoc", "add Rustdoc", "write TSDoc", or when working with TypeScript or Rust source files that need documentation comments. Supports file-level and selection-level operations. Deterministic and idempotent — safe to run repeatedly on the same code. Does NOT change behavior, rename symbols, or refactor code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add Hermes gateway media ingestion, background notification, and delivery behavior to the canonical cassette-video-edit MCP workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY work involving React, Next.js, TypeScript, or Tailwind in the browser layer. This includes building components and pages, but equally covers debugging and fixing frontend issues: CSS/Tailwind classes not applying, form validation behavior, hydration mismatches between server and client renders, styling bugs, layout shifts, and rendering problems. Also use for refactoring components (e.g., splitting Server vs Client Components), data fetching patterns, state management, bundle optimization, and frontend tooling. If the problem involves what users see or interact with in a web browser — whether building, fixing, or refactoring — use this skill. Not for backend APIs, databases, infrastructure, or DevOps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a written, reviewable plan or spec produced before coding starts. Triggers on: mapping out changes without implementing, thinking through risks of upgrades or migrations, evaluating approaches before committing to one, writing specs for team review, phasing work into stages, or any request that explicitly defers coding ('don't implement yet', 'before we build'). The distinguishing signal is that the user wants a plan artifact — not implementation, not a conversational answer. MUST activates inside Claude's native plan mode to have a better planning behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails to reduce common LLM coding mistakes with a caution-first approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase debugging process - root cause first, then fix. Use when encountering bugs or unexpected behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design implementation-ready frontend solutions with UX intent, component structure, responsive behavior, accessibility, and handoff criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze production Agentforce agent behavior using session traces and Data Cloud, and manage Agent Health Monitoring (AHM) alerts. TRIGGER when: user queries STDM session data or Data Cloud trace records; investigates production agent failures, regressions, or performance issues; asks about session traces, conversation logs, or agent metrics; wants to reproduce a reported production issue in preview; runs findSessions or trace analysis queries; creates, lists, updates, or deletes an AHM data alert on an agent metric (escalation rate, deflection, etc.); asks why an alert is not firing or wants to check whether alerts have fired (notification counts, or the per-alert Incidents view). DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, or debugs .agent files during development (use agentforce-generate); writes or runs test specs (use agentforce-test); uses sf agent preview for local development iteration; deploys or publishes agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when testing Flutter code - unit tests for logic, widget tests for UI behavior, golden tests for appearance, the multi-size/text-scale/dark matrix, accessibility guidelines, test-first

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase D of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: build the Avalonia UI shell with composition, MVVM state and commands, responsive XAML, accessibility, localization boundaries, and behavior-focused unit/Headless tests. Use only when an explicit migration is ready to port Forms or when the orchestrator routes here. Prefer this over control-by-control ports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a phased WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: behavior contracts, UI-independent application logic, platform adapters, MVVM shell, parity/cutover, evolution, and hardening. Use when the request explicitly involves moving a WinForms or .NET Framework desktop UI to Avalonia, or continuing that migration. Do not trigger for unrelated migrations, rewrites, ViewModel refactors, settings work, or command-line work without WinForms-to-Avalonia context. Load this orchestrator before one matching phase skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase A of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: inventory the legacy application, split responsibilities, capture command and state contracts, build a coverage matrix, and define acceptance evidence without implementing Avalonia UI. Use only in an explicit WinForms-to- Avalonia migration when behavior is undocumented or the orchestrator routes here. Generated artifacts must use the current repository's real paths, terminology, and capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase E of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: verify behavioral parity against Phase A contracts, record intentional differences, validate supported environments and packaging, and make evidence-based legacy cutover decisions. Use only for an explicit migration when comparing the legacy and Avalonia implementations or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not delete legacy without the cutover checklist and explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revenue-Centric Design (RCD) — evidence-backed principles for making a SaaS or startup product convert, retain, and monetize. Use when the user works on a landing page or CRO ("my page isn't converting"), onboarding/activation ("users sign up but don't stick"), churn/retention ("customers keep canceling"), pricing/monetization ("how should I price this"), checkout/forms ("dropdowns kill conversion", "annotated checkout"), dashboards/data viz ("cognitive load", "KPI shortlists"), positioning/ICP/go-to-market, feature scope, A/B-test rigor, or AI-era differentiation — or asks for the behavioral-science mechanism behind a design choice. Also use when another skill needs the principle or evidence behind a conversion/retention/pricing/checkout move. Never apply to gambling, betting, or casino products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run scored behavioral evaluations and repair gaps. Use when the user says "evaluate this agent" or "I want proof this behaves correctly"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive marketing expertise combining campaign execution, strategy frameworks, psychological principles, and 140+ marketing tactics. Use when planning campaigns, developing content strategy, applying behavioral science, generating marketing ideas, or building go-to-market strategies. Covers email, social, SEO, paid ads, content, and psychology-driven optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive market research and analysis skill. Use when sizing markets, conducting competitive analysis, generating professional market research reports, analyzing consumer behavior, or identifying market opportunities. Activates for: market research, market analysis, market report, TAM SAM SOM, market sizing, industry analysis, market landscape, competitive landscape, market trends, consumer research, Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, BCG Matrix, McKinsey-style report, consulting report, market opportunity, industry report, due diligence, M&A analysis, GTM market analysis, product-market fit validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用户在市场波动中情绪受到影响，或试图从市场价格变动中获取信息而非从企业分析中获取信息时。 语言信号："市场在跌，是不是该卖"/"大家都在买"/"这只股票涨了很多，一定有道理" 不适用于：纯粹的企业基本面分析（不含市场价格判断的场景）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用户面对市场极端情绪时需要做出逆向来决策。当所有人都在买入/卖出、市场处于极端乐观/悲观时。 语言信号："所有人都在赚钱"/"这次不一样"/"市场要崩了要不要全卖"/"再不买就来不及了" 不适用于：正常市场环境下的投资决策、纯基本面分析。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser-check what a change could have broken in timepicker-ui (library demo and docs-app, before/after). Use at the end of a task that changed library behavior or styles (app/src) or docs-app pages, or when the user asks to check that nothing broke. Not for demo examples in app/docs, copy/typo/comment edits or one-line fixes (HARD RULES §5 in CLAUDE.md). Main agent only, never delegated to a subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when optimizing, auditing, or preparing to ship web animations or rendering performance work: frame loops, scroll/viewport reveals, mount/unmount transitions, canvas/WebGL lifecycles, reduced motion, lazy rendering, and deferred off-screen work. Use for jank, per-frame allocations, forced reflows, render loops, animations that do not pause off-screen, content-visibility, requestIdleCallback, analyzing Chrome DevTools performance traces for animation or rendering issues, or choosing between browser-driven CSS/WAAPI, minimal JS, phase, and Motion/GSAP. Use when the user explicitly asks about phase APIs or behavior. Do not use during exploratory animation ideation, prototyping, visual iteration, or trying variants, even when the code already imports phase; wait until the user asks for performance guidance, an audit, production implementation, ship-readiness review, or about phase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。