「codebase」の検索結果

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Bazel builds for large-scale monorepos. Use when configuring Bazel, implementing remote execution, or optimizing build performance for enterprise codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up automatic keepalive for Appwrite free-tier projects to prevent them from being paused after 7 days of inactivity. Use when working in a codebase that uses Appwrite, when the developer mentions Appwrite free tier, project pausing, or keeping an Appwrite project alive, or when you detect Appwrite configuration (node-appwrite dependency, APPWRITE_ env vars, Appwrite SDK imports).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the local Claude CLI to review plans, diffs, full codebases, completed work, and exploit chains when the user explicitly wants a Claude second opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and update an arbitrary codebase to follow the Code.mil federal open-source licensing model (MIT with 17 U.S.C. Section 105 disclaimers and INTENT.md), including CRAN/R package DESCRIPTION setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs architectural code reviews focusing on design patterns, duplication, circular dependencies, and refactoring impact. Is the design consistent with the codebase? Use when reviewing code changes for architectural concerns, code smells, or structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops an implementation plan ready for wave-orchestration to execute. Takes the user's goal or rough plan as input, mines the codebase for facts, grills the user one question at a time for the decisions, drafts the planning/ artifacts (task DAG, wave table, worker prompt template, state file), then reviews its own plan on two axes before seeking approval. Use when the user wants to turn a feature idea, master plan, or backlog into a wave-orchestration execution plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Switch the current Cursor workspace to a different project directory using the cursor-app-control MCP. Use when the user asks to switch projects, open another repo, jump to a different codebase, or move to a worktree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore a large codebase in parallel by launching multiple explore subagents that each investigate a different area simultaneously. Use when onboarding onto a new project, understanding architecture, or investigating a cross-cutting concern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a systematic security audit of a codebase, checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and insecure patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start the dev server, discover API routes from the codebase, hit every endpoint, and report which ones return errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch multiple explore subagents in parallel to investigate architecture, data models, auth, APIs, and deployment. Synthesize into an onboarding document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate errors, incidents, or product ideas using both internet research and repo-wide codebase research, then propose a concrete changeset plan with clarifying questions before any implementation. Use when a user asks to investigate, root-cause, or plan changes, or when an Issue or PR is referenced and needs a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-specific AGENTS.md authoring and maintenance workflow. Use when creating, refreshing, or expanding AGENTS.md coverage for a codebase, including deciding whether nested AGENTS.md files are needed for subsystems with distinct rules, workflows, or AI-sensitive constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform 12-Factor Agents compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating agent architecture, reviewing LLM-powered systems, or auditing agentic applications against the 12-Factor methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You are reviewing housing management software or tenant management systems - Someone asks about Section 8, LIHTC, or public housing program compliance - You need to audit unit allocation algorithms for fairness or bias - A project involves waitlist management, income verification, or rent calculations - You are evaluating HUD compliance (50058, EIV, PIC submissions) - Someone mentions Fair Housing, reasonable accommodation, or protected class handling - You need to review HQS/NSPIRE inspection tracking or abatement workflows - A codebase handles tenant eligibility, subsidy calculations, or housing vouchers TRIGGER PHRASES: "affordable housing", "Section 8", "LIHTC", "public housing", "waitlist management", "income verification", "Fair Housing", "HUD compliance", "rent calculation", "housing voucher", "tenant management", "HQS inspection", "unit allocation", "housing authority"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to audit ad revenue performance or diagnose yield drops - Someone asks about header bidding configuration or Prebid.js optimization - You are analyzing fill rates, eCPM trends, or ad unit performance - A project involves programmatic advertising, SSP integration, or ad serving - You need to verify ads.txt, sellers.json, or supply chain compliance - Someone mentions CPM floors, bid density, or auction dynamics - You are evaluating ad quality controls, viewability, or ad-related UX impact - A codebase integrates Google Ad Manager, AdMob, Prebid, or any SSP TRIGGER PHRASES: "ad yield", "eCPM", "fill rate", "header bidding", "Prebid", "programmatic ads", "ad monetization", "CPM optimization", "ad revenue", "ads.txt", "ad serving", "SSP", "ad unit performance", "viewability"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。