1,923 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply MCAF documentation guidance for docs structure, navigation, source-of-truth placement, and writing quality. Use when a repo’s docs are missing, stale, duplicated, or hard to navigate, or when adding new durable engineering guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply MCAF agile-delivery guidance for backlog quality, roles, ceremonies, and engineering feedback. Use when defining how the team plans, tracks work, and turns feedback into durable improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visual vocabulary, design terminology, and prompt engineering strategy for Stitch. Reference this when you need layout pattern names, aesthetic style terms, color structure formulas, or device guidelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures technology diligence with architecture review, code quality assessment, scalability analysis, and technical debt evaluation. Use when evaluating startup technology, assessing engineering teams, or reviewing technical infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates ML applications in investment with feature engineering, model selection, and implementation considerations for alpha generation. Use when evaluating ML for investing, designing ML pipelines, or assessing ML strategy feasibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms vague UI/feature requests into structured, optimized prompts with design system awareness. Use when generating prompts for UI implementation, feature specification, or design-to-code translation. Triggers on tasks requiring prompt refinement, UI specification, or design system integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fintech engineering expertise — payment processing (Stripe, Plaid), PCI DSS compliance, financial data modeling (double-entry bookkeeping), fraud detection patterns, bank-grade security (encryption, tokenization), open banking APIs, cryptocurrency/blockchain integration, regulatory compliance (KYC/AML), and idempotent financial transaction design. Use for payment systems, banking apps, trading platforms, and fintech infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical product expert specializing in platform engineering, DevOps, and AI dev tools. Critically reviews the SDD plugin for DX issues, inconsistencies, and gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering — 40+ rules covering components, data fetching, bundle optimization, and rendering. Triggers on React components, Next.js pages, bundle optimization, performance improvements, refactoring React code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Number antibody variable domains, annotate CDRs, and assess developability from sequence. Use this skill to apply IMGT, Kabat, Chothia, Martin, or AHo numbering with ANARCI, delimit CDRs and framework regions, scan for chemical liabilities (N-glycosylation sequons, deamidation NG, isomerisation DG, oxidation, unpaired cysteine, fragmentation), compute pI, net charge, extinction coefficient and hydrophobicity, and plan humanisation by CDR grafting. Also trigger on antibody, nanobody, VHH, scFv, Fab, CDR, framework, ANARCI, abnumber, IgBLAST, OAS, SAbDab, humanization, Vernier residues, or developability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to deploy, operate, secure, or scale running infrastructure — cloud architecture (multi-region, VPC, FinOps), CI/CD and deployment strategies, secrets/IAM/supply-chain security, observability and SLO alerting, SRE and incident response, Kubernetes vs ECS and autoscaling, Terraform/Pulumi/CDK, or platform engineering and DORA metrics. Also for generating runbooks, pipeline configs, Terraform modules, or Kubernetes manifests. For choosing the system's architecture or stack before it runs (monolith vs microservices, which database), use software-architect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redact reverse-engineering findings for public disclosure while preserving methodology, generalizable patterns, and teaching value. Covers the private-vs-public repo split, deny-list pattern maintenance, orphan-commit publish pattern that prevents `git log` leaks, category-based redaction calibration (methodology/pattern/version-finding/internal), and the `check-redaction.sh`-style CI gate that blocks merges when a deny-listed pattern appears. Use when publishing findings about a CLI harness you don't own, when preparing upstream proposals to an unrelated project, or when archiving a private research repo for public reference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Probe the runtime state of a named feature flag in a CLI binary. Covers the four-pronged evidence protocol (binary strings, live invocation, on-disk state, platform cache), the four-state classification (LIVE / DARK / INDETERMINATE / UNKNOWN), gate-vs-event disambiguation, conjunction-gate handling, and skill-substitution scenarios where a flag appears DARK but the capability is delivered by other means. Use when verifying whether a documented or inferred capability has rolled out, when auditing dark-launched features, or when a prior probe's conclusions need refreshing against a new binary version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish and maintain longitudinal baselines of CLI binary contents across versions. Covers marker selection by category (API / identity / config / telemetry / flag / function), weighted scoring, threshold-based system-presence detection, and per-version baseline records. Use when tracking a feature's lifecycle across releases, when probing for dark-launched or removed capabilities, or when verifying that a scanning tool itself still catches known-good markers on old binaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify gate call variants in a minified JavaScript bundle. Covers context-window extraction around a flag occurrence, identification of 4–6 reader variants (sync boolean, sync config-object, bootstrap-aware TTL, truthy-only, async bootstrap, async bridge), default-value extraction (boolean / null / numeric / config-object literal), conjunction detection across `&&` predicates, kill-switch inversion detection, and production of a gate-mechanics record that feeds probe- feature-flag-state. Use when a flag's behavior cannot be inferred from its name alone, when the binary uses multiple reader libraries, or when config-object gates carry structured schemas distinct from boolean gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish Service Level Objectives (SLO), Service Level Indicators (SLI), and Service Level Agreements (SLA) with error budget tracking, burn rate alerts, and automated reporting using Prometheus and tools like Sloth or Pyrra. Use when defining reliability targets for customer-facing services, balancing feature velocity against system reliability through error budgets, migrating from arbitrary uptime goals to data-driven metrics, or implementing Site Reliability Engineering practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess an open-source agent framework for investment readiness by evaluating community health, supersession risk, architecture alignment, and governance sustainability. Produces a four-tier classification (INVEST / EVALUATE-FURTHER / CONTRIBUTE-CAUTIOUSLY / AVOID) to guide resource allocation decisions before committing engineering effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture outbound HTTP and telemetry from a CLI harness at runtime. Covers capture-channel selection (transcript file vs verbose-fetch stderr vs outbound proxy vs on-disk state), hook-driven per-event capture vs long-running session capture, JSONL output format for diff-friendly artifacts, and the observability table that maps each target to the cheapest channel that captures it. Use when a static finding needs runtime confirmation, when a payload shape is needed for a client re-implementation, or when dark-vs-live disambiguation requires watching what the binary actually sends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a feature store using Feast for centralized feature management, configure offline and online stores for batch and real-time serving, define feature views with transformations, and implement point-in-time correct joins for ML pipelines. Use when managing features for multiple ML models, ensuring training-serving consistency, serving low-latency features for real-time inference, reusing feature definitions across projects, or building a feature catalog for discovery and governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user, especially a new hire, asks for mentoring, guidance, or explanation of infrastructure or engineering practices. Not for code changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。