「requirements」の検索結果

Knowledge base from DOE Systems Engineering Methodology (SEM) Version 3 — the DOE SDLC for IT investments. Use for staged systems lifecycle planning through maintenance, Stage Exits, Structured Walkthroughs, In-Stage Assessments, requirements traceability, and CMM-aligned process discipline. Covers SEM3 (2002) guidance only; does not replace modern DevSecOps tooling standards, DOE O 413.3B capital-asset directives, or current CIO policy supersessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Fault Management Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1002, Draft 2, April 2012). Use for the systems-engineering discipline of designing what a system does when it fails — the fault/failure/anomaly vocabulary, the five FM strategies (two prevention strategies — design-time fault avoidance and operational failure avoidance — plus three tolerance strategies — failure masking, failure recovery, and goal change), the six FM process activities across NASA mission phases Pre-A to E, response-latency-versus-time-to-criticality (TTC) design trades, fault/failure containment regions and FEPPs, the four redundancy approaches, top-down FM requirements development, FM verification vs. validation, the seven dedicated FM milestone reviews (FMCR/FMARR/FMPDR/FMCDR/FMTRR/FMLRR/FMCERR), FM organizational structure, and mined NASA Lessons Learned. Space-mission oriented (flight/ground/operations); spacecraft examples throughout. IMPORTANT: built from an UNAPPROVED DRAFT — several sections (detailed architecture building blocks, the Assessment & Analysis guidance, and Operations & Maintenance) are placeholders in the source and are thin here. Thin on detailed FDIR algorithms, terrestrial/IT fault management, and any approved-standard terminology that may have changed since Draft 2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

文档需求分析：分析 docs/ 文件夹中的概念与需求文档，针对当前代码检查需求，并生成整合的差异报告。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Análisis de requisitos de documentos: Analiza los documentos de concepto y requisitos en la carpeta docs/, verifica los requisitos con el código actual y crea un informe de diferencias consolidado.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Анализ требований к документации: Анализирует документы концепций и требований в папке docs/, проверяет требования на соответствие текущему коду и создает консолидированный отчет об отклонениях.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ドキュメント要件分析: docs/ フォルダ内のコンセプトおよび要件ドキュメントを分析し、現在のコードと照らし合わせて要件を検証し、統合差異レポートを作成します。

Compares one policy against one requirement set (standard, regulation, contract schedule or customer requirement) clause by clause and returns a draft gap review: each requirement element, the policy clause that appears to address it, an apparent match state, and every gap as a question with the clause reference on both sides. Never concludes that the policy complies; the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "gap our policy against the standard", "map this policy to the regulation clause by clause", "check the security policy against the customer's contract schedule", "compare our policy with the new edition" or "where does our policy fall short of the requirements". Do not use for mapping a requirement to the operating controls that implement it, use controls-gap-pack instead; for what a regulatory change means for the organisation, use regulatory-change-impact-note. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flags where a P&ID draft raises a process safety question and points to the candidate evidence an engineer would review (HAZOP register, relief study, SIL assessment, isolation philosophy), as questions and quoted passages with UNKNOWN for missing documents, plus safety functions, relief devices and isolation requirements carried over as stated. Never rates, sizes, classifies, resolves or declares protection adequate. Use when the user asks to "write the process safety flags", "produce the process safety section of the P&ID enrichment", "list which protection questions this P&ID raises" or "map the HAZOP and relief study evidence to the draft" after gate G2, once the piping and instrumentation sections exist. Do not use for proposing loops, alarms or trips from the control philosophy, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use for checking identifiers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting creative work (features, components, functionality, or behavior changes) to clarify user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

非機能要件の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。IPA「非機能要求グレード」の項目体系に沿って、メトリクスごとのレベル値と要求内容を定める D2 成果物。機能一覧・外部システム一覧・C4モデル レベル1(システムコンテキスト)の整備後に呼び出す。

Resolve complex or high-impact problems when the cause, solution path, requirements, or proof boundary is genuinely uncertain. Use when work needs evidence-led diagnosis, consequential design or implementation, or a completion audit; do not trigger merely because work has multiple steps, or for simple facts, fully specified routine changes, or pure creative generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the current task to a verified result instead of stopping at a plausible report. Use when the user says /continue, keep going, not done yet, push further, or is unhappy with the result. Rebuilds requirements from the conversation, re-checks real state, fixes root causes, verifies from the consumer side, offloads side quests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Customize WP Rocket behavior from a third-party plugin / theme via filter hooks — exclude URIs / cookies / user agents / REST API namespaces from caching, configure CDN URL rewrites, extend lazy load handling, override capability requirements, hook into Action Scheduler integration. Critical guidance — rocket_cache_reject_uri takes URI patterns (regex-like), NOT full URLs; rocket_cache_reject_* filters all expect arrays. The rocket_buffer filter is the FULL HTML output filter — extremely powerful but dangerous; one fatal error in the callback breaks every cached page until WP Rocket is disabled. Use when extending WP Rocket's default rules, NOT for cache invalidation (see wp-rocket-cache-invalidation). Triggers on rocket_cache_reject_, rocket_cdn_, do_rocket_lazyload, rocket_buffer, rocket_capacity, "exclude from WP Rocket cache".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds and reviews the main entry-point PHP file of a WordPress plugin — header (with Requires Plugins for WP 6.5+), ABSPATH guard, file/path/url/version constants, Composer + PSR-4 with manual spl_autoload_register fallback, register_activation_hook requirements check, Plugin class instantiation on plugins_loaded, and the WP 6.7+ rule that translation functions must not trigger before after_setup_theme. Use when scaffolding a new plugin or reviewing its main file. Triggers on Plugin Name headers, register_activation_hook, Requires Plugins, spl_autoload_register, plugins_loaded, or composer.json at the plugin root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert requirements gatherer and agent builder. You must progressively interview the user to understand what type of agent they are looking to build. You should ask one question at a time w

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns requirements into a precise, dependency-aware implementation plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translates user intent into a precise, unambiguous specification and requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan an influencer campaign", "build a campaign blueprint", or "launch a product with creators"; produces campaign objectives, platform and influencer-tier strategy, content requirements, a phased timeline, budget allocation, and KPI targets. Not for writing individual creator briefs — use brief-generator; not for the overall product-launch plan (tiering, calendar, press, community day) — use launch-tier-planner, which hands this skill the creator lane. A launch request that does not mention creators routes to the launch discipline, not here. 达人营销策划/种草方案

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。