「rev」の検索結果

Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified", "is this actually done", "maker checker", "second pair of eyes on this change". Not for prose, docs or typo edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Chinese wealth management client meetings with performance summaries, talking points, and relationship context. Adapted from the original client-review skill for A-share portfolios and Chinese client conventions. Triggers on "A股客户回顾", "客户会议准备", "client review China", "wealth client review", "客户回访准备", or "prepare for client meeting [client]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates smart App Store review prompt infrastructure with configurable conditions and platform detection. Use when user wants to add review prompts, request ratings, or implement StoreKit reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' or 'data hygiene.' For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see email-sequence. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generation strategy — Request a Review, follow-up emails, insert cards, Vine, early reviewer programs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep Amazon review analysis for competitive intelligence and product improvement. Extract sentiment patterns, recurring complaints, feature requests, and competitive insights from customer feedback. Turn reviews into actionable product development and marketing strategies. Use when the user asks about review analysis, customer feedback, product complaints, sentiment analysis, or what customers think about products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review for the current change, before it is pushed. One command runs the security, secret, dependency and lint scanners that fit the changed files, a separate reviewer that checks every scanner finding and is given every changed line, and prints a short receipt with the path of the full report. Use before every git push, when asked for a code review, a security scan, or to review changes, a diff or a pull request, and when a push was blocked or warned by OpenQodex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review REST API contracts for HTTP semantics, versioning, backward compatibility, and response consistency. Use when user asks "review API", "check endpoints", "REST review", or before releasing API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code review for Java with null safety, exception handling, concurrency, and performance checks. Use when user says "review code", "check this PR", "code review", or before merging changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after a phase's code is written, or when the user asks to review changed files for bugs, security issues, or quality. Spawns the gsd-code-reviewer agent at quick, standard, or deep depth and writes the phase REVIEW.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after gsd-code-review has written REVIEW.md, when you want its Critical and Warning findings fixed. Spawns the fixer agent, commits each fix atomically and writes REVIEW-FIX.md (--all, --auto to iterate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, triage, and write academic rebuttals and review responses. Use when an AI research agent needs to handle conference, journal, workshop, or grant reviews; classify reviewer concerns; decide what evidence or experiments can change the decision; write an AC-facing executive summary; draft per-reviewer responses; correct factual misunderstandings without sounding hostile; handle novelty, baseline, method, experiment, clarity, and scope objections; or produce a final rebuttal checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarizes GitHub PR, GitLab MR, or Azure DevOps PR metadata, review threads, changed files, and template completeness. Use during review-ticket or code-review workflows when PR/MR context exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified team skill for code review. 3-role pipeline: scanner, reviewer, fixer. Triggers on team-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze user-provided reference images and reverse-engineer high-fidelity AI image-generation prompts. Use when the user asks to recreate, imitate, reverse-engineer, or extract prompts from photographs, illustrations, 3D renders, products, characters, landscapes, typography, logos, posters, or other visual references. Do not use for requests that only require OCR or an ordinary image description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review test code for quality, design, and completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug. Use when the user asks to "review my tests", "check my test quality", "are these tests good enough", "review testing", or after completing a feature implementation that includes tests. Also use when tests feel brittle, flaky, or superficial. Cross-references production code to find coverage gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging. This is NOT a general code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Use this skill when reviewing a small set of changes locally (such as unstaged diff), when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev quality review, or when the user wants a critique of a specific file or function.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR size-based review depth, performance review checklist, architecture conformance checks, and framework-specific review patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a focused STRIDE-based security review using Bug Hunter-native artifacts. Use whenever the user asks for a full security audit, repository security review, weekly security scan, PR security review with deeper validation, or wants dependency CVEs and threat-model context combined into one workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。