2,837 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
AutoMCM-Pro industrial-grade math modeling agent. Supports AP (AI-led) and Manual (human-spec-led) dual modes with mandatory GitOps checkpoints, forced self-verification of all solver code before LaTeX inclusion, and structured human cross-validation at each pipeline stage. Use for both CUMCM (Chinese) and MCM/ICM (English) competitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AutoMCM-Pro industrial-grade math modeling agent (opencode binding). Supports AP (AI-led) and Manual (human-spec-led) dual modes with mandatory GitOps checkpoints, forced self-verification of all solver code before LaTeX inclusion, and structured human cross-validation at each pipeline stage. Use for both CUMCM (Chinese) and MCM/ICM (English) competitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AutoMCM-Pro industrial-grade math modeling agent (Codex CLI binding). Supports AP (AI-led) and Manual (human-spec-led) dual modes with mandatory GitOps checkpoints, forced self-verification of all solver code before LaTeX inclusion, and structured human cross-validation at each pipeline stage. Use for both CUMCM (Chinese) and MCM/ICM (English) competitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AutoMCM-Pro industrial-grade math modeling agent (DeepSeek Harness binding). Supports AP (AI-led) and Manual (human-spec-led) dual modes with mandatory GitOps checkpoints, forced self-verification of all solver code before LaTeX inclusion, and structured human cross-validation at each pipeline stage. Use for both CUMCM (Chinese) and MCM/ICM (English) competitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use BIRD Book Deconstructor 2.2 to apply the formal BIRD 2.1 Knowledge Address protocol to complex manuscript text and TheBrain Thoughts. Use when splitting books into chapter/section/item knowledge nodes, assigning Book Address, structured Knowledge Index (Weight, Type, Keyword, Alias), Routes, verified Deep Links, and Semantic Roles; producing BIRD Excel workbooks, TheBrain scaffolds, Roam JSON, monochrome printable double nine-grid cards, or a routed handoff from iMandalArt to A4 eight-page booklets; or auditing and migrating existing BIRD/TheBrain indexes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert structured project-note JSON manuscripts into validated EPUB and optional Kindle-clickable PDF files. Use when the user asks to turn project notes, book-system JSON, FIRE-indexed notes, Luhmann/Zettelkasten numbered chunks, table-of-contents cards, index cards, cross-linked project notes, or manuscript JSON into an EPUB/PDF with chapter directories, keyword index cards, weighted links, bidirectional backlinks, versioned filenames, chapter-splitting plans, and full link testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview-based strategic planning for complex software tasks. Conducts structured requirements gathering, gap analysis, and generates detailed work plans before implementation begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze formal verification artifacts (Isabelle, Coq, Dafny, etc.) and produce structured reports identifying the precise boundary between verified, assumed, and unverified components. Use when assessing verification coverage, understanding trust boundaries, auditing formal proofs, or documenting verification scope. Reports explicitly list verified code, assumptions, axioms, trusted computing base, and unverified components. Conservative and explicit about verification status without attempting to repair or mask gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate natural-language requirements or structured specification documents into formal temporal logic properties (LTL, CTL, safety/liveness properties). Use when users need to formalize requirements for model checking, formal verification, or property specification. Handles embedded/real-time systems, hardware verification, concurrent systems, and reactive systems. Resolves ambiguities, asks clarifying questions when needed, and outputs machine-checkable formulas with explanations. Supports multiple output formats (SPIN, NuSMV, Uppaal, TLA+, Maude).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive test case documentation from test code, test framework output, existing test docs, and source code context. Use when documenting test suites, creating test specifications, generating test coverage reports, onboarding developers to testing practices, or preparing QA documentation. Analyzes test functions (pytest, unittest) to extract test names, docstrings, assertions, and organization, then produces structured markdown with both overview-level summaries and detailed test case specifications including purpose, preconditions, steps, expected results, and test data. Triggers when users ask to document tests, generate test specifications, create test reports, summarize test coverage, or explain what tests do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument programs (Python, C/C++, Java) to capture snapshots of key program states at runtime, including variables, memory, and call stacks. Use when you need to debug complex issues, reproduce test cases, prepare traces for formal verification, or analyze program execution. Supports manual instrumentation points, automatic function/method instrumentation, and conditional triggers. Outputs structured JSON snapshots for debugging, replay, and verification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish explicit traceability between formal specifications (preconditions, postconditions, invariants) and verified code components with their correctness proofs. Produce structured Markdown mapping reports showing verification coverage and proof evidence. Use when auditing formal verification, documenting verified systems, establishing traceability for certification, or when the user asks to map specifications to code, generate verification reports, or analyze verification coverage in Coq, Dafny, Isabelle, or other proof assistants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instruments authentication, authorization, and input-handling code paths to monitor security-relevant events and states at runtime. Use this skill when developers need to add security monitoring and logging to their code, including tracking authentication attempts (login/logout), authorization decisions (access control checks), input validation failures, session management events, and other security-critical operations. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Java with structured logging patterns. Triggers when users ask to add security instrumentation, monitor security events, log authentication/authorization, track security-sensitive operations, or add security observability to their codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates comprehensive test scenarios from requirements including BDD/Gherkin scenarios, unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end test cases. Use when converting requirements, user stories, or specifications into testable scenarios with full coverage including happy paths, error cases, edge cases, and boundary conditions. Outputs structured test suites ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured proof skeletons with tactics, strategies, and intermediate lemmas for theorems in Isabelle/HOL or Coq. Use when users need to: (1) Create proof outlines for theorem statements, (2) Generate proof structure with tactic placeholders, (3) Identify key lemmas needed for a proof, (4) Plan proof strategies (induction, case analysis, forward/backward reasoning), (5) Scaffold proofs with intermediate steps and subgoals, or (6) Convert theorem statements into detailed proof templates. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates structured context summaries for continuing work across AI sessions. Use when ending a session to enable seamless continuation in a new session without losing context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert pseudocode, algorithm descriptions, or specifications into complete, executable Python code. Handles natural language descriptions, structured pseudocode, and formal algorithm specifications. Generates production-ready code with type hints, docstrings, error handling, and test cases. Use when users need to (1) convert pseudocode to Python, (2) implement algorithms from descriptions, (3) translate algorithm specifications to code, (4) generate Python implementations from textbook pseudocode, or (5) create executable code from high-level algorithm designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate concise, structured summaries of requirements for quick team understanding. Use when analyzing requirements from text documents (MD, TXT, DOCX) or technical specifications to create bullet-point summaries that highlight core functionality and dependencies/constraints. Ideal for sprint planning, stakeholder updates, team onboarding, or any situation requiring rapid comprehension of requirement documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically derives TLA+ properties (invariants, safety, liveness) from natural-language requirements or structured requirement documents. Resolves ambiguities, asks clarifying questions for underspecified requirements, and outputs TLA+-compatible property definitions with semantic explanations. Use when translating system requirements, specifications, or behavioral constraints into formal TLA+ temporal logic properties for verification with TLC model checker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Locate root causes of failing regression tests by analyzing code changes, error messages, and test dependencies. Use when regression tests start failing after code changes, investigating test failures in CI/CD, debugging flaky tests, or understanding why previously passing tests now fail. Analyzes git diffs, stack traces, test output, and dependency changes to produce structured markdown reports ranking likely causes. Triggers when users ask to find why tests are failing, debug regression failures, investigate test breakage, or analyze failing test suites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unified GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. Classifies open items, answers questions from codebase, analyzes bugs, reviews PRs, and produces a structured triage report. Triggers: 'triage', 'triage issues', 'triage PRs', 'github triage'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically generate clear, actionable issue reports from failing tests and repository analysis. Analyze test failures to understand expected vs. actual behavior, identify affected code components, and produce well-structured Markdown reports suitable for GitHub Issues or similar trackers. Use when a test fails, when debugging issues, or when the user asks to create an issue report, generate a bug report, or document a test failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reorganizes markdown documents into well-structured, consistent format while preserving content and improving readability. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Fix heading hierarchy issues (skipped levels, multiple h1s), (2) Generate or update table of contents, (3) Standardize formatting (lists, code blocks, emphasis, links), (4) Improve grammar and spelling, (5) Add missing standard sections (installation, usage, etc.), (6) Remove redundant or duplicate content, (7) Restructure technical docs, READMEs, or long-form content for better organization and flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically identify metamorphic properties (symmetry, linearity, additivity, input invariances) from programs or functions. Use when generating metamorphic tests, discovering program properties, validating transformations, or creating test oracles without explicit specifications. Analyzes control flow, data flow, and sample executions to output structured properties for metamorphic test generation and verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。