「assess」の検索結果

Compares old and new requirement documents, analyzes code repository impact, and generates detailed modification plans. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Compare requirement versions and identify changes, (2) Map requirement changes to code components, (3) Identify components to modify, delete, or add, (4) Analyze dependencies and integration points, (5) Assess test impact, (6) Generate comprehensive modification plans in Markdown format. Supports text/Markdown requirements and analyzes feature-level, functional, and API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that design documents, code implementations, and tests fully cover all specified requirements. Use this skill when validating requirement traceability, conducting design reviews, assessing implementation completeness, checking test coverage against requirements, performing compliance audits, or identifying missing functionality. Produces coverage reports showing which requirements are satisfied, partially satisfied, or missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze differences in program intervals between two versions of a program (old and new) to identify added, removed, or modified intervals. Use when comparing program versions, analyzing variable ranges, detecting behavioral changes in numeric computations, validating refactorings, or assessing migration impacts. Supports optional test suite integration to validate interval changes. Generates comprehensive reports highlighting intervals requiring further testing or verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces comprehensive summaries and insights about legacy codebases to help understand unfamiliar code. Use when onboarding to a new project, planning refactoring efforts, assessing code for acquisition/migration, or generating documentation for undocumented systems. Analyzes architecture, dependencies, code quality issues, and test coverage. Creates high-level overviews with architecture diagrams, key components, entry points, and actionable insights for understanding and improving legacy code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies boundaries between modules or components in software systems through static code analysis and dependency detection. Use when Claude needs to analyze software architecture, identify module boundaries, detect boundary violations, find circular dependencies, or assess component coupling. Supports Python (packages and imports) and Java (packages and dependencies). Trigger when users ask to "identify boundaries", "find component boundaries", "detect boundary violations", "analyze module structure", "check architecture", or "find circular dependencies".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and analyzes conflicts in software requirements including logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, and stakeholder priority mismatches. Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts that could block implementation or cause rework. Provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze CVE reachability in software repositories by examining how vulnerable dependencies are imported and used. Determines whether vulnerable components, classes, or functions are reachable from project code through call chain analysis, reflection detection, dynamic loading patterns, and configuration-gated behavior. Classifies each CVE as likely reachable, possibly reachable, or likely unreachable with supporting evidence. Use when analyzing security vulnerabilities in dependencies, performing post-disclosure CVE triage, assessing vulnerability impact, or when users ask to analyze CVE reachability, check if vulnerabilities are exploitable, or evaluate dependency security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure and package support escalations for engineering, product, or leadership with full context, reproduction steps, and business impact. Use when an issue needs to go beyond support, when writing an escalation brief, or when assessing whether an issue warrants escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage incoming support tickets by categorizing issues, assigning priority (P1-P4), and recommending routing. Use when a new ticket or customer issue comes in, when assessing severity, or when deciding which team should handle an issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate vendors with comparison matrices, TCO analysis, risk assessment, reference check templates, and negotiation strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile and explore datasets to understand their shape, quality, and patterns before analysis. Use when encountering a new dataset, assessing data quality, discovering column distributions, identifying nulls and outliers, or deciding which dimensions to analyze.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build business cases with cost-benefit analysis, ROI calculations, risk assessment, implementation timeline, and stakeholder analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATE when evaluating acquisition targets, conducting M&A due diligence, planning integration strategy, analyzing synergies, preparing sale materials, assessing culture fit, valuing targets, creating merger checklists, or managing M&A transactions. Critical for executives involved in buy-side or sell-side M&A, from initial target evaluation through post-acquisition integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TRIGGER THIS when conducting performance reviews, writing manager feedback, creating self-assessments, building peer feedback, developing PIPs, creating development plans, or handling difficult performance conversations. Helps write constructive, specific, actionable feedback that develops performance and documents performance management appropriately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-epic review to extract lessons and assess success. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication, authorization, rate-limit, and CI/CD testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design effectiveness from a UX perspective. Assesses visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, and overall design quality with actionable feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for security vulnerabilities. Use when the user says 'security review', 'security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'pentest the code', 'OWASP check', or any variation of wanting a security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。