1,527 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Weekly review partner that compounds productivity gains over time. Tracks velocity, logs friction, sets next-week targets, recognizes patterns across weeks, and feeds insights back to the audit for the next loop. Use when you want a weekly review, need to identify friction, want to see patterns, or want to update your system map. Part of the architect-system loop. Outputs to system/compounder/week-{date}.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor blogs and RSS/Atom feeds via blogwatcher-cli tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handle pull requests and review comments using GitHub CLI (gh). Use when the user wants to check PR comments, address review feedback, reply with commit hashes, or work with pull requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the screens, UX, wording, feedback after actions, accessibility, or layout of frontend/ come up, even without the word "review" — delegates to the frontend-ux-reviewer agent, which runs the dev screens against the Lean CLI with Playwright and reports with evidence. Not for reviewing the domain model itself (that is the ddd skill's review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically consume open GitHub issues one by one. Fetches the oldest open issue, delegates implementation to the issue-implementer agent, runs code review via the code-reviewer agent, iterates on feedback, merges the PR, and moves on to the next issue. Invoke with `/auto-issue-worker`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates and maintains competitive battlecards from win/loss data, competitor intel, G2 reviews, and sales feedback. Use when building battlecards for a specific competitor, updating existing battlecards with new intel, preparing BDRs or AEs for competitive deals, analyzing win/loss patterns against a competitor, or responding to a competitor's product launch or pricing change. Also use when asked to "build a battlecard," "update competitive intel," "how do we beat [competitor]," "what do we say when a prospect mentions [competitor]," or "analyze our win/loss against [competitor]." Designed for B2B SaaS teams selling against known competitors in deals with multi-persona buying committees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess a company's economic moat, EBITA margin trajectory, and organic growth trajectory from analyst reports, earnings transcripts, or long-form articles. Produces structured qualitative outlook that feeds into the Financial Modeling skill's assumption generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects early-stage ransomware indicators in network traffic before encryption begins, including initial access broker activity, command-and-control beaconing, credential harvesting, reconnaissance scanning, and staging behavior. Uses network detection tools (Zeek, Suricata, Arkime), SIEM correlation rules, and threat intelligence feeds to identify ransomware precursor patterns such as Cobalt Strike beacons, Mimikatz network signatures, and RDP brute-force attempts. Activates for requests involving pre-ransomware detection, network-based ransomware indicators, or early warning ransomware monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures Windows Event Logging with advanced audit policies to generate high-fidelity security events for threat detection and forensic investigation. Use when enabling audit policies for logon events, process creation, privilege use, and object access to feed SIEM detection rules. Activates for requests involving Windows audit policy, event log configuration, security logging, or detection-oriented logging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines, or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or automated IOC processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a phishing report button in email clients with automated triage workflow that analyzes user-reported suspicious emails and provides feedback to reporters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an automated pipeline to defang indicators of compromise (URLs, IPs, domains, emails) for safe sharing and distribute them in STIX format through TAXII feeds and threat intelligence platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the full implement-review-fix loop using implementer and reviewer personas. Supports effort-based multi-reviewer scaling (1-5 reviewers) with automatic specialization selection. Includes memory-based feedback loop that learns from past review patterns. Loops until all reviewers find 0 issues of any severity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SEO audit: Google Search Console data + URL Inspection API + PageSpeed Insights API + technical crawl + keyword research + metadata audit + schema markup audit + search intent analysis + Core Web Vitals monitoring. Feeds real GSC data and PageSpeed metrics into AI to surface quick wins, diagnose traffic drops, find content gaps, identify metadata mismatches, detect schema gaps, monitor page performance, and produce an actionable 30-day plan. Use this skill whenever the user asks about SEO, search rankings, organic traffic, Google Search Console, keyword performance, traffic drops, content gaps, search visibility, technical SEO, meta tags, schema markup, structured data, URL indexing, keyword research, indexing issues, page speed, performance, Core Web Vitals, LCP, INP, CLS, or Lighthouse scores. Also trigger on: "why is my traffic down", "what keywords am I ranking for", "improve my rankings", "check my search console", "SEO audit", "analyze my SEO", "technical SEO", "meta tags", "indexing issues", "crawl errors", "content strategy", "keyword cannibalization", "search intent", "schema markup", "structured data", "URL inspection", "page speed", "performance score", "core web vitals", "lighthouse", or any organic search question. If in doubt, trigger. This skill handles everything from quick GSC checks to deep technical audits with performance monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a user interview topic in PostHog — pick who to target (cohort, emails, or PostHog distinct IDs), draft what to ask about, and prepare the voice-agent context plus a question list. Use when the user asks to "talk to users", "check how users feel about X", "interview some customers", "set up a user interview", "run a user-research call", "find users to ask about Y", or otherwise wants qualitative feedback through a conversation. Walks the user through targeting (cohorts-list, persons-list, or accepting emails / distinct IDs directly), captures the topic, and prompts for agent context and questions before calling user-interview-topics-create. Cohort targeting is resolved to explicit emails/distinct_ids at create time — topics snapshot their audience and do not re-evaluate cohort membership later. Do NOT trigger when the user is uploading a recorded interview audio file (that's the separate UserInterview/transcript flow) or only browsing existing topics with user-interview-topics-list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fine-tune LLMs using reinforcement learning with TRL - SFT for instruction tuning, DPO for preference alignment, PPO/GRPO for reward optimization, and reward model training. Use when need RLHF, align model with preferences, or train from human feedback. Works with HuggingFace Transformers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps metabolomics results to biological pathways via over-representation (ORA), metabolite-set enrichment (MSEA/QEA), mummichog/PSEA on raw m/z peaks, and network-diffusion enrichment (FELLA), with correct background-set construction and honest interpretive ceilings. Use when interpreting differential metabolites or an untargeted LC-MS feature table in pathway context, choosing ORA vs MSEA vs mummichog vs topology, or setting the reference/background set. For annotation confidence levels feeding ORA see metabolomics/metabolite-annotation; for gene-set concepts see pathway-analysis/go-enrichment and pathway-analysis/gsea; for joint gene+metabolite pathways see multi-omics-integration/mofa-integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。