「question」の検索結果

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a Markdown guide that helps humans understand a repository through real behavior, concepts, and evidence. Use when a user asks to understand a repo, generate or update repo-docs, answer repo-architecture/onboarding questions, seed docs for a new project, sync docs after code changes, or delete generated repo docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Neutral, framework-agnostic decision tree for project kickoff: "which agent / RAG / LLM framework should I reach for?" Synthesizes the ecosystem sections of 7 landmark-project SOPs (LangGraph, LlamaIndex, DSPy, CrewAI, vLLM, Aider, Dify) into one layered rubric. Core stance: frameworks are LAYERS, not competitors — a real project usually combines DSPy (compile) + LlamaIndex (retrieve) + LangGraph (orchestrate) + vLLM (serve), and you choose ONE per layer, not one to rule all. Use when starting any LLM/agent/RAG project, or whenever the "which framework?" question is asked. Deliberately neutral — unlike vendor docs and the LangChain-biased `framework-selection` on skill.sh, this skill has no horse in the race.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck, GRIM/GRIMMER, Problematic Paper Screener, Seek & Blastn). Use when asked to check a paper/figure for image duplication, blot splicing, impossible statistics, paper-mill or tortured-phrase signals, research integrity, or "is this data faked"; or when a user shares a figure, Western blot, supplementary dataset, or DOI and asks whether it looks manipulated. Reports observable anomalies as questions for clarification — it never accuses anyone of fraud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for promoting a prose prompt into a typed DSPy Signature. This is an ENHANCE overlay on top of the [[dspy]] library skill: it does NOT teach DSPy syntax — it answers the coder-agent decision "when do I stop hand-writing a prompt string and declare it as a `dspy.Signature`, and how do I name/describe its fields so the optimizer and the calling code both get a clean contract." Activate when: a prompt string grows past ~50 lines; the LM output is consumed by code (parsed, branched on, stored) rather than read by a human; the same prompt is reused across >1 call site; or a teammate asks "should this be a Signature?". Do NOT activate for one-shot throwaway prompts, or for HOW-TO questions about DSPy modules /optimizers/compile — defer those to the [[dspy]] skill and the [[agentsop-dspy]] workflow skill. Search keywords: typed prompt, structured prompt, DSPy Signature, prompt as a function, prompt contract, when to formalize a prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview preparation and recording-consent law. Use for research, question frameworks, one-party or all-party consent rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model-guided autonomous root-cause analysis over a UModel object-graph semantic layer. Use with `umodel-query` when diagnosing service degradation, SLO breach, latency/error spikes, incidents, outages, or questions like why a service is slow, degraded, erroring, or timing out. The skill guides evidence collection across object graph, metrics, logs, topology, runbooks, deployments, config changes, business traffic, and runtime capacity; it is especially useful for ruling out red herrings such as recent but unrelated deployments. Triggers: root cause, RCA, incident, SLO breach, outage, postmortem, latency spike, error spike, timeout, 根因分析, 故障排查, 告警定位, 为什么慢, SLO 击穿.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Podcast knowledge workflows powered by Podwise CLI: search podcasts and episodes by keyword, monitor followed shows for new releases, find popular episodes, ask questions and extract insights from transcript content, process Podwise episode URLs, YouTube videos, Xiaoyuzhou links, and local audio or video files to retrieve transcripts, summaries, chapters, Q&A, mind maps, highlights, and keywords — plus catch up on your backlog, refine your listening taste, generate weekly recaps, export episode notes to PKM tools, research topics across podcasts, debate episode ideas, and generate language learning cards. Use when the user wants to find, summarize, transcribe, or extract insights from any podcast or audio content, or manage their listening library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Align on the shape of a change through an interview, then implement it. Escalates open product decisions and settles the implementation shape in conversation. Use when the user asks to "discuss this change", "align on this change first", "ask me questions first", "interview me then implement", "agree on the approach before coding", or wants the shape of a single change settled before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain whatever the user is pointing at right now in plain language: a pending question, a piece of code, an error, a command output, or an artifact like a plan or findings report. Use when the user asks to "explain this", "what am I being asked", "what's happening right now", "help me understand this", "what does this mean", "what does this error mean", "what is this code doing", or "what do these options mean".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for social science academic paper drafting, outlining, diagnosis, review, and revision. Trigger for topic diagnosis, research question refinement, literature review planning, CNKI/Google Scholar literature search-to-Zotero workflows, structured paper reading notes, theoretical framework design, research design critique, draft review, section or paragraph revision, citation and evidence risk checking, causal-claim checking, and pre-submission review. Do not use for purely creative writing or non-academic editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when drafting GitHub issues for the Positron repository. It provides workflows for searching duplicates, selecting appropriate labels, gathering complete context through questioning, and writing terse, fluff-free issues that precisely describe what is needed or wrong. The skill prepares issues for manual submission by the user. Use this skill when the user asks to draft or prepare an issue for Positron.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill enriches vague prompts with targeted research and clarification before execution. Should be used when a prompt is determined to be vague and requires systematic research, question generation, and execution guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) skill for the D&D 5e System Reference Document (SRD). Use when answering questions about D&D 5e core rules, spells, combat, equipment, conditions, monsters, and other SRD content. This skill provides agentic search-based access to the SRD split into page-range markdown files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any offensive-security engagement or task — establishes how to find and invoke the right skill before any action (including clarifying questions, recon, exploitation, or reporting)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wireframe-first pass — outputs an ASCII layout + state list + content inventory + question list before any code. Use when starting a new screen from scratch or when the user's brief is still ambiguous. Invoke when the user asks for shape on their UI, or mentions 'shape' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduction pass — cuts content, structure, visuals, and dead code that doesn't answer a user question or drive an action, respecting CRAFT_LEVEL. Use when the UI feels cluttered, has too many CTAs, walls of text, or decorative noise, or when the user says "simplify this" / "it feels too busy". Invoke when the user asks for distill on their UI, or mentions 'distill' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。