「reports」の検索結果

Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating, designing, drafting, revising, stress-testing, or preparing academic articles, empirical research reports, literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, journal submissions, reviewer responses, research methods, sampling, measurement, analysis, publication readiness, or citation/source audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a set of Rosetta Stone attribute mappings to a Narrative dataset by wrapping them in a one-shot workflow that calls the `CreateRosettaStoneMappingsIfNotExist` task. Consumes the structured output of `/generate-rosetta-stone-mappings`, normalizes the generator's snake_case to the workflow task's camelCase, re-validates every expression against the dataset's current schema, gates on user approval, submits via `narrative_workflows_create`, polls the triggered run, and reports per-mapping created / conflict / failed. Use when: "apply these mappings to dataset N", "create the Rosetta Stone mappings I just generated", "push the mappings I saved earlier to <dataset>", "productionize this mapping list", "submit the suggested_mappings array". (narrative-common)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate self-contained HTML/CSS benchmark and comparison charts in an ego-inspired Browser-Native Editorial style. Use for blue-white product metrics, model benchmarks, A/B comparisons, efficiency reports, difficulty breakdowns, and compact technical data panels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare standardized metrics across multiple ego-benchmark-harness runs by recalculating them from tasks.jsonl and session JSONL, never from HTML reports. Covers overall aggregates (success rate/average score), Odysseys per-rubric pass rates, duration distributions (avg/p50/p90/max), turns/tools/cost, error and exception counts, per-task success matrices, helper distributions, and the share of DOM operations. Use whenever users ask to compare data or metrics across runs, calculate aggregate/Odysseys/duration/turn/error/helper metrics, inspect differences among runs, or compare multiple rwb/real-world-bench runs. Use pi-session-analyzer instead for deep forensic analysis of why an individual task was slow or failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a new function, adding a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring with test coverage, or writing a new test. Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predict-the-failure-before-every-run checks, hardcode-first minimum changes, triangulation, and property-based testing for large input spaces. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and on any task phrased as "implement", "add", "write a function", "build a feature", or "fix a bug" in a test-capable codebase. Reports red/green validation evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage TestFlight crashes, beta feedback, and performance diagnostics using asc. Use when the user asks about TF crashes, TestFlight crash reports, beta tester feedback, app hangs, disk writes, launch diagnostics, or wants a crash summary for a build or app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a risk register together with meeting notes and incident reports and returns a draft update pack: existing risks whose exposure, controls, ownership or status the sources say have changed, new risk candidates, closure candidates, and the one owner decision each item needs. Never assigns or changes a likelihood, impact, score or colour and never edits the register; owners decide. Use when the user asks to "update the risk register from these minutes", "refresh the register with the incidents since the last review", "reconcile the register against the notes" or "what changed on our risks". Do not use for writing up an incident itself, use incident-postmortem-drafter or data-incident-impact-brief instead; to track actions from minutes, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure a target repository's queue and find a live open issue the contribution would close, before opening a pull request there. Reports how many PRs are open, how many of the last N closed ones were actually merged, and which issue to attach to, because a cold PR into a dead queue is a wasted artifact. Triggers: "/issue-match", "is this repo worth a PR", "measure the queue".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eat the elephant one bite at a time: turn a large list-shaped job into a finite routine that chews a small batch every night, detects when it is done, switches itself off and reports. Triggers: /elephant, eat the elephant, split into bites, make it a routine, ten a day, backfill everything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fan one deep-research prompt out to several external LLMs at once through a logged-in browser, then collect the reports, archive the originals and synthesize a consensus. Use at the final stage of a research protocol, instead of hand-pasting one prompt into N sites. Triggers: "/dr-fanout", "fan out the DR", "distribute the research prompt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide-as-cofounder mode: the owner hands over the decision itself, so the agent does not ask back, does not offer a menu of options and does not wait, but picks, acts and reports the call with its reasoning. Triggers: /decide, /ds, decide yourself, your call, up to you, you know better, do as you see fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for strategic work: recall the knowledge vault, run a gap analysis, emit a deep-research prompt for external tools, then synthesize the returned reports into a decision memo. Use before any new product, feature, market, pricing, GTM or architecture call, where local recall alone is not enough. Triggers: "/alfa-search-recall-deepresearch", "alpha protocol", "R+DR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured report on completed work, a feature area, or a topic. Saved to the reports directory. Invoked by saying "report", "generate report", or "summarize work".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run assay on a web page you just wrote or changed. It opens the page in a real browser, drives every control, and reports where the page contradicts itself. Deterministic, no API key, no network.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for internationalization (i18n) correctness — text-domain consistency, use of escaped translation helpers (esc_html__, esc_attr__, esc_html_e), correct placeholder helpers (sprintf with translator comments, _n for plurals, _x for context), no variable text-domains, no concatenation inside __() calls, presence of load_plugin_textdomain or load_theme_textdomain, and matching declared Text Domain in the plugin/theme header. Use before plugin/theme release, when reviewing contributor PRs, when adding new strings, when migrating to a new text domain, or when a translator reports issues with the .pot file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous AI security pen testing. Executes real exploits against web applications to find SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, authentication flaws, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Reports only confirmed, reproducible findings — no false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces marketing performance reports and data-driven recommendations from WooCommerce sales data, social media metrics, and campaign analytics. Use when the task asks for "campaign performance", "ROI analysis", "monthly report", "sales trends", "product velocity", "audience insights", or "KPI tracking". Covers metric definition, reporting templates, slow-mover detection, and insight-to-action frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track rankings" or "查排名"; measures keyword and SERP-position deltas over time from provided exports or connected tools, including AI-response checks. Not for multi-metric stakeholder reports or setting alerts — use performance-monitor (report or alert mode). 排名追踪/SERP监控

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "create a campaign report", "build an executive summary", or "deliver client results"; produces audience-tailored influencer marketing reports (executive, client, internal team) with data tables, narrative, key learnings, and recommendations. Not for raw metric computation — use performance-analyzer. 达人营销报告/结案汇报

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。