6,325 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply when you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time, or notice a recurring correction. Encode the rule as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a DRAFT data incident impact brief from the incident notes and data inventory the user provides: the timeline as stated, systems involved matched to the inventory, data categories held and evidenced as involved, people and record counts potentially affected with the source and method behind every figure, third parties, notification questions for legal and the data protection officer, and every UNKNOWN with the evidence that would settle it. No legal determination: it never states whether the incident is a reportable breach, whether notice is due, to whom or by when. Use when the user asks to "prepare the impact brief for this incident", "what data was involved", "how many people are affected", "map the incident to our data inventory" or "pull together what legal needs on the incident". Do not use for the blameless postmortem or root-cause timeline, use incident-postmortem-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a blameless incident postmortem (summary, impact, timeline, detection and response, contributing factors as candidates for review, action items) from an incident channel export, ticket notes and any alert or change records, with UNKNOWN for every fact the inputs do not contain. Never assigns blame, names a root cause or re-rates severity. Use when the user asks to "write the postmortem for this incident", "build the incident timeline from the chat export", "draft the post-incident review" or "turn this ticket and channel log into an incident report". Do not use for a knowledge article from the resolved ticket, use knowledge-article-drafter instead; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis; for data-breach impact and notification questions, use data-incident-impact-brief. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
runtime 組込みのメモリ機能とは別に、プロジェクト横断の学び・失敗・意思決定・中断点を長期記憶から検索し、確定した知見を記録する。最上位のセッションの開始・再開、過去の経緯の参照、知見の確定、終了時の要約で使う。委譲された担当では自動発動しない。Cursor の非同期入口はこのSkillで定める。
runtime 組込みのメモリ機能（Claude Code の auto memory、Codex の memories 等）とは別に、プロジェクト横断の学び・失敗・意思決定・中断点を長期記憶から検索し、確定した知見を記録する。最上位のセッションの開始・再開、過去の経緯の参照、知見の確定、終了時の要約で使う。委譲された担当では自動発動しない。短期の判断差分は /field-notes、感想は /ai-diary に分ける。
Use when migrating a CopilotKit v1 application to v2 -- updating package imports, replacing deprecated hooks and components, switching from GraphQL runtime to AG-UI protocol runtime, and resolving breaking API changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mutate WooCommerce variation prices via filters — pick the right layer (woocommerce_product_get_price for simple/non-variation products, woocommerce_product_variation_get_price for variations, the woocommerce_variation_prices_* family for the parent min/max aggregation that feeds the catalog "From X to Y" range), and the critical step of filtering woocommerce_get_variation_prices_hash whenever your price logic depends on context outside the default cache key (user role, custom toggle, time of day) — otherwise one user's filtered price gets cached and served to everyone. Use for role-based pricing, time-based discounts, or "filter variation prices but the min/max range doesn't update" debugging. Triggers on woocommerce_product_get_price, woocommerce_product_variation_get_price, woocommerce_variation_prices_*, woocommerce_get_variation_prices_hash, wc_var_prices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a custom Query type for JetEngine's Query Builder — extend \Jet_Engine\Query_Builder\Queries\Base_Query for the runtime query class, extend \Jet_Engine\Query_Builder\Query_Editor\Base_Query for the editor component, then hook BOTH register actions — jet-engine/query-builder/queries/register (factory) for the runtime, jet-engine/query-builder/query-editor/register for the editor UI. Five abstract methods on Base_Query — _get_items(), get_items_total_count(), get_items_page_count(), get_items_pages_count(), get_current_items_page(). Built-in cache via get_cached_data() / update_query_cache(). Custom queries participate in JE 3.8+ MCP tool exposure and the frontend query inspector automatically. Use when scaffolding a custom query type (HPOS WC orders, third-party API source, custom DB table) for JetEngine listings, dynamic widgets, or REST API endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "track our share of voice", "what share of the conversation do we own vs competitors", or "trend our SOV this quarter"; computes SOV% = brand mentions ÷ (brand + competitor panel mentions) per platform per period on a LOCKED competitor panel — a panel switch invalidates the trend (restart the series and log the break; the ECHO O3 rule) — plus a sentiment-weighted SOV variant (sentiment labeled Estimated unless human-coded) and a Wikipedia-pageviews attention-share alternative; built from keyless listening connectors, gdelt.py news echo, and user exports — public counts only, closed platforms are never scraped. Not for backlink or offsite SEO signals — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 声量份额/竞品声量对比/提及份额/注意力份额
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "check if our surfaces have drifted from the canon", "watch for competitor repositioning", or "define when we should reposition"; produces a drift report — self-drift per flagship surface vs the narrative-registry canon over time (via wayback.py, change history Measured with as-of dates), competitor-repositioning alerts, an explicit repositioning-trigger condition set, and a D1/W1/M1 message-shift retro (intended vs actual pull-through, evidence-labeled) — feeding the TALE L drift-audit sub-items and the narrative-whiplash guardrail fact base. Not for the first-time consistency check before a surface ships — use narrative-cascade-planner; not for computing the TALE profile result or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for echo-rate / AI-answer resonance measurement — use narrative-resonance-monitor. 自漂移监测/竞品重定位告警/重定位触发/叙事漂移复盘
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For signup/registration optimization, see signup. For ongoing email sequences, see emails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "pick a launch date", "plan the launch window", or "set the embargo and lift time"; produces a candidate-window comparison table (conflict / tailwind / risk per window) built from industry-event cycles and the competitor launch calendar, a launch-week vs rolling-release format call, store-review buffer padding (labeled Estimated), and an embargo window definition (lift moment + timezone) submitted to the launch registry as a candidate. Not for judging the cultural moment itself — use trend-spotter; not for launch-day execution — use launch-day-conductor. 发布择时/发布窗口/竞品日历/禁运期窗口/审核缓冲
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marketing project management and execution excellence for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when coordinating multi-channel campaigns, allocating team resources, planning agile marketing sprints, running QBRs with clients, managing project timelines, balancing marketing workload, or implementing marketing operations scrum. Also triggers on: campaign coordination, resource allocation, agile marketing, sprint planning, client success, QBR, project timeline, marketing ops scrum, workload balancing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product-led growth and customer-base growth for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for self-serve funnel work (activation, time-to-value, free trial vs freemium, PQL definition, in-product upgrade moments, sales-assist triggers) and for growing revenue from existing customers (adoption, expansion, churn-save, renewal marketing, net revenue retention). Also triggers on: PLG, product-led growth, activation, aha moment, time to value, free trial, freemium, PQL, product qualified lead, onboarding, self-serve, customer marketing, expansion revenue, upsell, cross-sell, churn, retention, NRR, renewal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for optimizing MSBuild build parallelism and multi-project scheduling. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds not utilizing all CPU cores, speeding up multi-project solutions, evaluating graph build mode (/graph), build time not improving with -m flag, understanding project dependency topology. Note: /maxcpucount default is 1 (sequential) — always use -m for parallel builds. Covers /maxcpucount, graph build for better scheduling and isolation, BuildInParallel on MSBuild task, reducing unnecessary ProjectReferences, solution filters (.slnf) for building subsets. DO NOT USE FOR: single-project builds, incremental build issues (use incremental-build), compilation slowness within a project (use build-perf-diagnostics), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (expensive_projects, expensive_targets, project_target_times); falls back to dotnet build -m, dotnet build /graph, binlog replay + grep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (evaluations, evaluation_global_properties, evaluation_properties, imports, properties); falls back to dotnet msbuild -pp:full.xml for preprocessing, /clp:PerformanceSummary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix MSBuild targets that generate files during the build but those files are missing from compilation or output. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: generated source files not compiling (CS0246 for a type that should exist), custom build tasks that create files but they are invisible to subsequent targets, globs not capturing build-generated files because they expand at evaluation time before execution creates them, ensuring generated files are cleaned by the Clean target. Covers correct BeforeTargets timing (CoreCompile, BeforeBuild, AssignTargetPaths), adding to Compile/FileWrites item groups, using $(IntermediateOutputPath) instead of hardcoded obj/ paths. DO NOT USE FOR: C# source generators that already work via the Roslyn pipeline, T4 design-time generation that runs in Visual Studio, non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, search, target details); falls back to dotnet build /bl, binlog replay with diagnostic verbosity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Transcription SDK for Python. Use for real-time and batch speech-to-text transcription with timestamps and diarization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
差分が「その差分自身を審査するレビュー基準・品質ゲート」を弱めていないかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 レビュールールの削除・弱体化（.river/rules.md / .river/rules.d/*）、Check 2 実行時コンフィグの閾値・ゲート緩和（.river-review.{json,yaml,yml} の review.severity 引き下げ / exclude 拡大 / memory.suppressionEnabled 無効化 / selection.skills.exclude 追加）、Check 3 suppression entry の新規追加、Check 4 lint・静的解析設定からのルール削除や無効化、Check 5 branch protection・required check の緩和、の 5 Check を対象とし、これらが機能変更と同一 PR に混在し、かつ意図の宣言が無い場合に指摘する。report-only。workflow の permissions / action pin は gha-workflow-security、既存 suppression entry の使い分けは suppression-feedback、設定ファイルの一般的妥当性は config-json、.only / .skip / @ts-ignore / @ts-nocheck は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器、リファクタと機能追加の混在は behavior-structure-separation へ委譲する
リファクタリングを「更新されたチームの理解と、コードが表現する過去の理解の差分同期」と捉え、今回得た新知識（要求・ドメイン知識・制約）が naming と responsibility へ反映されているか、boundary が現在の understanding を表現しているか、diff の削除行やコメントに現れる過去の design history と constraint を失っていないかを diff-time で確認する。Knowledge Delta の signal は diff（追加/削除された hunk・コメント・ADR 参照）を一次情報とし、PR 本文が供給されるときは補助に用い、不確実なら question に留める。ドメイン用語の一貫性は ubiquitous-language-naming、集約/コンテキスト境界の設計判断は bounded-context-language、投機的抽象化・caller special-case は altitude-generalization、スコープ逸脱/前提破壊は fix-scope-integrity、振る舞い変更と構造変更の分離は behavior-structure-separation、完了主張の反証は refactor-claim-audit へ委譲する