「your」の検索結果

Weekly clinical-trial status diff — the 11-category change report over the stored weekly snapshots (spec 055 FR-B03). Surfaces exactly what changed on the trial registry for your coverage: New / Suspended / Withdrawn / Terminated / Recruiting / Recruitment-Complete / Completed / Ahead / Delayed / Upsized / Downsized, every row carrying previous and new values, with risk flags on Terminated and Downsized and re-timing flags on Ahead and Delayed. The stored-previous-value discipline makes each week's diff reproducible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local and self-hosted text-to-speech with Kokoro, the ~82M-parameter open-weight (Apache 2.0) model by hexgrad. Use when synthesizing speech offline, on-device, in the browser, or on your own server without per-character API cost — for high-volume narration, audiobooks, privacy-constrained pipelines, and prototyping. Covers running Kokoro via the Python `kokoro` package, ONNX / kokoro-js in the browser, and the OpenAI-compatible Kokoro-FastAPI wrapper; picking voices and language codes; blending voices; chunking long text; controlling pronunciation via misaki/espeak-ng; and judging when Kokoro is the right tool versus when its lack of voice cloning, narrow emotional range, and weaker non-English quality mean you should reach for a hosted or larger model instead. Not for voice cloning, expressive/emotional character performance, or high-fidelity multilingual work — say so and route elsewhere.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate content ideas backed by real audience demand data from Reddit questions, YouTube search gaps, Twitter discussions, and web search trends. Identifies proven topics, underserved questions, and content formats that outperform in your niche.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enrich any entity — companies, domains, emails, or people — with verified data from multiple sources. Combines Apollo, Strale, LinkedIn, and Akta data to fill gaps in your CRM, lead databases, or research datasets with production-quality enrichment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. Audits skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, commands, credentials, and memory files across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and NanoClaw. Produces a structured inventory and narrative briefing with cross-ecosystem risk analysis. Use when the user asks to audit their own setup, check what they have installed, review their agent stack security posture, or understand cross-tool interactions. Use when a user has accumulated skills/plugins/MCP servers over time and wants visibility into their attack surface. Use after installing new skills or plugins. Do NOT use for vetting external code before install (that is repo-forensics). Do NOT use for incident response during active attacks. Do NOT use for fixing or patching vulnerabilities (forensify is read-only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Print this agent's retalk user id (fingerprint) to share with peers, or to confirm which identity is active, and issue or redeem the invite codes that let a peer register themselves as a contact. Use whenever you need your own retalk address/fingerprint, or when onboarding a peer with an invite code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read incoming retalk messages from this session's user's DESIGNATED sender(s) — one-shot, or as a background --follow reader that surfaces new messages in the session as they arrive (on your next turn). agent-talk only ever receives from specific saved peers, never the whole mailbox (safety). `<user>` is this session's user directory (absolute path; from init). Always renders the conversation (sent + received) as a beautiful chat transcript so the user can track it. Use to check mail or stay reachable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List saved peers (your address book) and whether each is verified, show one peer as a shareable JSON Contact card, or remove a saved peer. Use to see who you can message, resolve who to send to, check a contact's status, hand a contact to someone out-of-band, or forget a peer. `<user>` is this session's user directory (absolute path; from init).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or resume THIS session's retalk user — from your existing users (global ~/.agent-talk or project-local ./.agent-talk) or a new one. Use for first-time setup, to pick which identity this session acts as, or when a command fails with "no identity". agent-talk has no default user; pick one with AskUserQuestion (distinct per parallel session). All human input (relay, passphrase, peers, receive source, delivery mode — auto-receive recommended) is gathered here so send/receive run autonomously afterward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Block a sender so their messages are dropped before decryption (and the relay is told to refuse their resends); re-allow one with `--remove`, or list blocked senders with `--list`. Use to stop unwanted or abusive mail from a specific sender, undo a block, or audit your block list. If the sender is not specified, ask with AskUserQuestion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute structured exploratory testing sessions. Covers Session-Based Test Management (SBTM), charter writing, heuristic-based exploration (HICCUPS, FEW HICCUPS), bug discovery patterns, note-taking templates, and conversion of findings to automated tests. Use when: "exploratory testing," "SBTM," "manual testing," "bug hunting," "test charter," "heuristic testing." Not for: an AI browser agent autonomously exploring the app from a natural-language goal — use agentic-browser-testing. Not for: testing your product's own AI/LLM features — use ai-system-testing. Related: test-planning, ai-bug-triage, risk-based-testing, agentic-browser-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review EXISTING test code for quality, smells, and testability issues. Detects test smells across six dimensions — readability, reliability, diagnostic value, design, AI-generated, and coverage — analyzes testability of application code, and backs the qualitative smells with mutation testing. Use when: "review my tests," "test quality audit," "test smells," "testability analysis," "are these tests any good." Not for: generating new tests — use `ai-test-generation`. Not for: testing AI features in your product — use `ai-system-testing`. Related: unit-testing, shift-left-testing, coverage-analysis, ai-test-generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement consumer-driven contract testing with Pact-JS (v16). Covers consumer test writing, broker-driven provider verification, Pact Broker setup, can-i-deploy as a deployment gate, webhook-triggered verification, pending pacts, and schema-first vs consumer-first approaches (OpenAPI/Ajv, Schemathesis). Use when: "contract test," "Pact," "consumer-driven," "API contract," "provider verification," "can-i-deploy." Not for: stubbing or mocking a dependency to isolate a test — use service-virtualization; general REST/GraphQL endpoint assertions against your own API — use api-testing. Related: api-testing, service-virtualization, ci-cd-integration, test-environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test for regulatory compliance: GDPR/CMP consent verification, Google Consent Mode v2, Global Privacy Control (GPC), CCPA/US state opt-out, EU AI Act Article 50 transparency, Better Ads Standards, and cookie-inventory auditing. Covers automated consent-flow testing, third-party script blocking before consent, and cookie drift detection. Use when: "GDPR test," "compliance," "CMP test," "cookie consent," "consent mode," "CCPA," "GPC," "AI Act," "Better Ads," "privacy banner." Not for: WCAG/axe-core test authoring — use accessibility-testing. Not for: OWASP/vuln scanning — use security-testing. Not for: evaluating your LLM feature's quality or safety — use ai-system-testing. Related: accessibility-testing, security-testing, ai-system-testing, ci-cd-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, regex extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing or Litmus). Related: playwright-automation, api-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates new Source of Truth (SoT) files when existing templates don't fit your needs. Triggers on requests to create a new SoT file, add a new artifact type, or when user says "I need to track [X] but there's no SoT for it", "create SoT", "new source of truth". Outputs a properly structured SoT.*.md file with ID prefix, frontmatter, and update protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map the competitive landscape before positioning your product for PRD v0.2 Market Definition. Triggers on completing v0.1 Spark, analyzing competitors, researching market, or requests like "competitive analysis", "who else solves this", "market landscape", "what alternatives exist", "competitor research", "feature comparison". Outputs CFD- entries for competitive intelligence and BR- entries for positioning rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit how AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude) describe and recommend your product, then propose fixes. Triggers on requests to audit AI search visibility, improve AEO/GEO, check ChatGPT/Perplexity coverage, or when user asks "do we show up in AI search?", "AEO audit", "generative engine optimization", "AI discoverability", "how does ChatGPT describe us?", "Perplexity ranking". Outputs GTM-AEO-* entries and a Coverage Matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to read, create, or edit Korean Hangul Word Processor documents (.hwp or .hwpx files). Triggers include any mention of 'hwp', 'hwpx', '한글 문서', '아래한글', '한컴오피스', or uploading/attaching .hwp/.hwpx files. Also use when extracting text from Korean reports or producing Korean-formatted official documents (공문, 보고서, 계약서, 사업계획서). Do NOT use for Word .docx files (use the docx skill instead) or general Korean text without Hangul Word Processor format. ⚠️ SECURITY: if the task fills a form with personal data (주민등록번호·계좌·연락처·주소 등), LOAD THIS SKILL FIRST — before any `ls`/`cat`/`Read`/`grep` of the working dir or home — and NEVER directly cat/Read/grep a profile or 내정보 file (e.g. ~/.claw-hwp/profile.txt), even "to check it". Its SECURE FILL flow reads values in-process only; reading them yourself leaks them into context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。