「rev」の検索結果

Go back through the previous year of work and create a Notion doc that groups relevant links into projects that can then be documented as SRED projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan agent skills for security issues. Use when asked to "scan a skill", "audit a skill", "review skill security", "check skill for injection", "validate SKILL.md", or assess whether an agent skill is safe to install. Checks for prompt injection, malicious scripts, excessive permissions, secret exposure, and supply chain risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog setup health. Reads the project's active health issues — the deterministic findings of PostHog's own health checks (no live events, outdated SDKs, missing reverse proxy, absent web vitals, ingestion warnings, failing data-warehouse models, and more) — and decides which are genuinely worth surfacing. Unlike a one-signal-per-issue push, it bundles kind-clusters into a single finding, weights by real blast radius (cross-referencing actual event volume and reach), and prioritizes issues an agent can resolve via the MCP. Emits only above the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog error tracking to capture and monitor exceptions. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure errors are tracked with stack traces and source maps. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, refresh, and rewrite PR titles and descriptions following Sentry conventions. Use when opening a PR, writing or updating a PR title/body/description, refreshing an existing PR after material changes, or preparing branch changes for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog product analytics events to track user behavior. Use after implementing new features or reviewing PRs to ensure meaningful user actions are captured. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog LLM analytics to trace AI model usage. Use after implementing LLM features or reviewing PRs to ensure all generations are captured with token counts, latency, and costs. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog SDK integration to your application. Use when setting up PostHog for the first time or reviewing PRs that need PostHog initialization. Covers SDK installation, provider setup, and basic configuration for any framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog log capture to track application logs. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure meaningful log events are captured with structured properties. Also handles initial OTLP exporter setup if not yet configured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, branch -D, etc.) before they execute. Use when user wants to prevent destructive git operations, add git safety hooks, or block git push/reset in Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog feature flags to gate new functionality. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure safe rollouts with feature flag controls. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy applications and websites to Vercel. Use when the user requests deployment actions like "deploy my app", "deploy and give me the link", "push this live", or "create a preview deployment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit and improve articles by restructuring sections, improving clarity, and tightening prose. Use when user wants to edit, revise, or improve an article draft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and clean up stale feature flags in a PostHog project. Use when the user wants to find unused, fully rolled out, or abandoned feature flags, review them for safety, and then disable or delete them. Covers staleness detection, dependency checking, and safe removal workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures the analytics side of a PostHog experiment — exposure criteria (default `$feature_flag_called` vs custom exposure events), primary and secondary metrics, the supported metric types (count, sum, ratio with `math` and `math_property`, retention with `retention_window_start` and `start_handling`), multivariate user handling ("Exclude" vs "First seen variant"), and how to read results once the experiment is live. Use when the user adds or edits a primary or secondary metric (e.g. "add a secondary metric tracking 'downloaded_file' per user"), sets up a ratio metric (e.g. "revenue from purchase_completed / pageviews"), sets up a retention metric (e.g. "$pageview → uploaded_file, 7-day window"), configures custom exposure (e.g. "only count users who hit /checkout"), changes multivariate handling, or asks "who is in the analysis?", "how do I measure impact?", "is this winning?", "what's the confidence level?", or "should I ship?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit PostHog experiments and feature flags for configuration issues, staleness, and best-practice violations. Read when the user asks to audit, health-check, or review experiments or feature flags, check flag hygiene, or verify experiment setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements. TRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor a pull request for CI failures, review comments, and merge conflicts — then fix them automatically. Use when a PR is open and you want the agent to keep it merge-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-analysis / evidence synthesis — pool effect sizes across studies (odds ratios, risk ratios, hazard ratios, mean differences, correlations, GWAS betas) with fixed- or random-effects models, quantify heterogeneity (Q, I², τ²), and build a forest plot. Use when you have results from MULTIPLE studies and need a single pooled estimate, or to synthesize evidence from a systematic review / multiple GWAS / replicated experiments. Handles the error-prone effect-size + standard-error preparation (converting OR/HR/CI, two-group means±SD, proportions, and correlations into the (effect, SE) the pooling step needs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic test / biomarker accuracy — sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, accuracy from a 2x2 table; ROC curve, AUC, and the optimal cutoff (Youden) for a continuous biomarker; and post-test probability via Bayes. Use when you have test results vs a gold standard (binary 2x2, or a continuous score + true labels) and need to judge how good the test is, pick a threshold, or compute the probability of disease given a result. Emphasizes the prevalence-dependence of PPV/NPV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for mechanistic interpretability research using TransformerLens to inspect and manipulate transformer internals via HookPoints and activation caching. Use when reverse-engineering model algorithms, studying attention patterns, or performing activation patching experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality patterns and guidelines for ToolUniverse tool development. Apply when writing, fixing, or refactoring tool Python code in the ToolUniverse project. Encodes lessons from 80+ debug rounds. Use alongside devtu-fix-tool and devtu-self-evolve. Triggers: implementing tool fixes, writing new tool classes, reviewing tool code quality, checking schema correctness, looking up API-specific bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。