「failure」の検索結果

Use when writing or debugging Linux drivers: platform, I2C/SPI, device-tree, char-device, IRQ, DMA, regmap, PM, sysfs, udev, NACK, -EREMOTEIO, or probe failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when debugging shared library load failures, setting RPATH or RUNPATH, applying soname versioning, writing dlopen plugins, or intercepting with LD_PRELOAD. Not for static archives: use binutils.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding telemetry, composing an observability surface, reviewing alerts, shipping a production feature, or diagnosing a production issue. Not for live failures, profiling, or launch runbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Rust code, especially unsafe or panic-critical paths, needs a Kani, Verus, or Creusot harness written, run, and its failure read. Not for choosing the proof policy: use proof-driven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when one reviewer is not enough because failure modes are heterogeneous, or a claim needs cross-lens pressure before it ships. Not for collapsing a decision field: use converge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a bug, failure, flake, regression, review finding, or ticket needs the core fixed so it cannot recur. Not for greenfield features: use tdd. Not for style-only review or typo-class one-liners.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize a pydantic-ai agent's instructions, tool descriptions, output type, and signature inputs using the gepa CLI. Trigger when the user asks to "optimize this agent", "improve tool descriptions", iterate on prompts driven by eval failures, or otherwise improve a pydantic-ai agent against a dataset. Operates in the user's repo with full filesystem access — YOU are the reflection model; the gepa CLI handles minibatches, evaluation, and Pareto bookkeeping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select, run, and report proportional Proto UI validation for a completed change. Use before review, handoff, commit, or pull request updates, and after resolving validation failures. Cover focused evidence first, then affected graph, types, docs, packaging, consumers, release, or repository checks according to risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement one governed Proto UI Adapter-profile realization slice. Use when target and runtime range, supported or omitted Module role, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, failure behavior, compatibility boundary, and evidence scope are fixed by current authority. Use pui-adapter-assess for research or readiness assessment and pui-regression first for a governed failing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or implement the smallest complete executable evidence for a governed Proto UI behavior. Use for conformance cases, regression tests, cross-layer verification, test-entity mappings, failure-path coverage, or validation-plan design. Do not use tests to decide unsettled semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or revise one governed Proto UI Host Capability connecting a semantic Module to a bounded host responsibility. Use when capability identity, portable need, public shape, availability, failure, replacement, cleanup, fidelity, Adapter realization, and evidence are fixed by current authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a new Odylith Casebook bug from concrete failure evidence and grounded repro details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when concrete Odylith failure evidence needs a Casebook bug with grounded repro details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix silent failures when parsing Grafema semantic IDs that are in URI format instead of legacy arrow format. Use when: (1) code splits semantic IDs by "->" but gets the whole string back because IDs are grafema:// URIs, (2) file path extraction from semantic IDs returns empty or wrong values, (3) derived edges (DEPENDS_ON, etc.) produce 0 results despite source edges existing, (4) any code that processes semantic IDs after the analysis pipeline's to_uri_format() has run. The grafema:// URI format uses # fragments with percent-encoded characters instead of -> separators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Playwright automation failures against code-server (VS Code in browser). Use when: (1) trust dialog blocks all clicks — "monaco-dialog-modal-block intercepts pointer events", (2) button:has-text() finds wrong buttons behind modal dialog, (3) keyboard shortcuts don't work — Meta vs Control inconsistency, (4) VS Code extension activity bar icon not found by aria-label, (5) panels show placeholder text despite extension being "Connected". Covers trust dialog dismissal, keyboard shortcut hybrid mode, extension panel selectors, and database connection verification for Grafema extension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot local AWS Bedrock authentication and region configuration for the Cline CLI as Dr. Bedrock. Use when users report Bedrock CLI errors, AWS profile/default-chain issues, credential_process/SSO/IAM credential failures, missing region, AccessDenied, model access, or provider config problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for writing, configuring, and debugging Claude Code hooks. Use when adding, writing, or debugging hooks — including silent failures and permission errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile, profile, diagnose, optimize, and compare Ascend NPU operators across CANN versions and A2/A3/A5 for Ascend C, CATLASS, Triton-Ascend, TileLang-Ascend, PyPTO, and SHMEM/MC2. Use when an operator already has a runnable implementation and the user asks for msOpProf collection, bottleneck analysis, source-level tuning, or a reproducible before/after performance report. Do not use as the primary workflow for operator creation, migration, or unresolved correctness failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure and verify NowStack Mobile transactional email with Resend and Convex. Use for sender/domain setup, OTP delivery, password/reset messages, production email credentials, or deliverability failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up the local iOS dev/build toolchain for NowStack Mobile: Xcode, Simulator, CocoaPods, Watchman, mobile deps, and first `expo run:ios`. Use for `/ns setup-ios`, simulator preview, `expo run:ios` failures, or before local TestFlight builds. macOS only; signing is `/ns ios setup`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finish NowStack Mobile Google Play setup and internal Android releases. Use for signed AAB upload, gpc/browser fallback, privacy/app-content gates, or gpc commit failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。