3,781 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Investigate two separate areas of the codebase simultaneously and combine findings into a comparison report. Use when you need research on two independent topics at once, want to compare two subsystems, or need to understand how two components relate to each other.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about GitNexus itself — available tools, how to query the knowledge graph, MCP resources, graph schema, or workflow reference. Examples: "What GitNexus tools are available?", "How do I use GitNexus?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Steward public stories about any work — creation ethics, application ethics, and maintenance of the story plus its disclosures (generated, drafted, curated, authored). Use when writing a public article, origin story, talk, README narrative, or showcase about how work was made; when publishing ethics and decisions; or when asked who generated vs curated a text. Do not use for ADRs, FAQs, skill citations, or marketing hype.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or refresh screenshot-led product hero images, localized interface captures, and image-led README sections for GitHub repositories. Use whenever a user asks to make a GitHub README show a GUI product visually, add software screenshots, design a README hero image, reproduce a screenshot-collage reference, or prepare repository-bound visual documentation. For GUI applications, default to the deterministic product-proof split hero with real software screenshots unless the user explicitly requests another visual direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preview a signed-off design one release phase at a time — cut it down into a series of phase screens, each showing only what exists by that phase with the layout untouched, then put them on a scrubber you drag to watch the screen fill in release by release. Use when the user wants a Phase 1 / MVP version of an existing wireframe or mockup, phased or staged screens, a design sliced by release phase or story map, or wants to see what a screen looks like before later features land.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Which docs in nuxt-crouton to trust and how to resolve contradictions between them. Use when two docs disagree, when a doc's claim doesn't match the code ("the README says packages/nuxt-crouton but that dir doesn't exist"), when deciding whether a guide/writeup is authoritative before following it, or when asked "is this doc current", "which doc wins", "why does CLAUDE.md say X but the code says Y". Also the reference for the supersession-banner practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
System reference for the crouton layout engine (@fyit/crouton-layout) — the LayoutTree/layout_configs data model, the croutonLayoutBlocks registry and sizing contract, the viability metric, the deterministic placer (#709), and how layouts persist and seed. Use when reasoning about WHY a layout renders/composes/persists the way it does, when a question is shaped like "what is a LayoutTree / where do layouts live / why did the placer pick this arrangement / why won't this pane shrink / where does minWidth get read", or when a generated POC boots with the wrong (or no) default layout. Trigger phrases: "layout tree", "layout_configs", "viability check", "composeDefaultLayout", "block sizing contract", "why is my layout not viable". For authoring a block component, use the block-authoring skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
At the close of an epic (or a difficult issue), post a postmortem roundup comment — what went well, what was hard (backed by evidence), and 1–3 concrete proposals to improve the skills/flows — then offer to turn accepted proposals into their own `workflow`-labeled tasks, and end with a `🔭 Next` handoff (a paste-ready next-session prompt + the next epic to start). Use at epic close, after the "verify the whole thing" rollup, or when asked to "do a retro", "postmortem this epic", "what did we learn", "how do we improve the workflow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to actually run every kind of test in nuxt-crouton (unit/e2e/typecheck/lint, verified commands) plus the HONEST coverage picture — which packages have real tests vs zero, the dormant skipped/todo cases behind three mocking walls, and what CI truly gates vs what CLAUDE.md claims. Use when asked "how do I run the tests", "is X covered by tests", "what does CI actually check", "why is this suite skipped", "where do I add a test", or before trusting a green build as evidence that something works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive positioning diagnostic — figures out where you actually stand relative to competitors and whether that position is defensible. Use this skill when someone needs to understand their real competitive position (not the one on the slide deck), when a new competitor has entered the market, when customers are switching and nobody can explain why, when pricing power is eroding, when a strategic investment depends on knowing whether the moat is real, or when leadership says "we're differentiated" but can't explain how. Draws on Playing to Win, Porter's generic strategies, and Blue Ocean thinking — applied as diagnosis, not planning. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit a GitHub README; create only a hero, section headers, diagrams, badges, motion graphics, showcase modules, or other README assets; or turn a repository homepage into a cohesive visual story. If whole-README work versus asset-only work is unclear, ask which scope the user wants. For hero-like assets where pure SVG and generated raster material are both viable, explain the tradeoffs and confirm the implementation before creating the asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a contract list (spreadsheet, CSV or pasted table) and returns a DRAFT renewal radar: each active contract's end date, notice deadline with its arithmetic, days remaining, renewal type, owner and the decision it needs as options, sorted by urgency, with owner action lists and a deadline calendar. Never renews, terminates, serves notice or recommends. Use when the user asks to "build a renewal tracker", "tell me what comes up for renewal", "work out when notice is due", "show me which contracts auto-renew" or "run the quarterly contract review". Do not use for reviewing one contract's full text or clauses, use contract-review-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure a target repository's queue and find a live open issue the contribution would close, before opening a pull request there. Reports how many PRs are open, how many of the last N closed ones were actually merged, and which issue to attach to, because a cold PR into a dead queue is a wasted artifact. Triggers: "/issue-match", "is this repo worth a PR", "measure the queue".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How NV oOS approval gates work for operator credentials and how to phrase tool requests so the human can adjudicate quickly. Use whenever a write-capable tool call pauses for approval or when planning a destructive change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install and authenticate the flowctl CLI for Estuary. Use when setting up flowctl for the first time, troubleshooting authentication, upgrading to the latest version, or configuring programmatic access for CI/CD. Use when user says "install flowctl", "set up flowctl", "flowctl auth", "how to authenticate", "token expired", "not authenticated", "FLOW_AUTH_TOKEN", "CI/CD setup", "programmatic access", "upgrade flowctl", "flowctl not found", "command not found flowctl", "Exec format error", or "flowctl on Windows".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand work down the chain master session, project orchestrator, package orchestrator. Use when the human asks how to split work across levels, which channel connects them, or what each level may do. A convention mapped onto existing mechanisms, not a new tool. GO is never inherited.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Aws Pricing — aWS pricing helper for cost queries. ALWAYS use get_aws_cost script for pricing questions. Use when: - User asks about AWS resource costs or pricing - User wants to compare pricing across regions - User needs spot, on-demand, or reserved pricing info Triggers: aws pricing, aws cost, how much does, ec2 price, rds cost, s3 pricing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to use windows-computer-use-mcp effectively — tool selection, focus rules, safety, and mission design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to improve their app's star rating, increase ratings volume, optimize when and how they prompt users for a review, or recover from a bad rating period. Use when the user mentions "app rating", "star rating", "review prompt", "SKStoreReviewRequest", "In-App Review API", "ask for review", "low rating", "rating drop", "get more reviews", or "recover from 1-star". For responding to reviews, see review-management. For overall ASO health, see aso-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to design or optimize their app's monetization — pricing, paywalls, subscriptions, or in-app purchases. Also use when the user mentions "pricing", "paywall", "subscription", "IAP", "how to monetize", "revenue optimization", "free trial", or "conversion to paid". For retention impact, see retention-optimization. For competitive pricing, see competitor-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。