「iter」の検索結果

Search academic literature and generate research hypotheses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for execution, supports continuous agent operation via Claude Code /loop and OpenClaw heartbeat, and produces research presentations and papers. Use when starting a research project, running autonomous experiments, or managing a multi-hypothesis research effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Identical to greploop, but triggers reviews by tagging @greptile-apps, which bypasses Greptile's file-count limit on huge PRs that the plain @greptile mention refuses to review. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a large PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep Codex-native Amazon FBA product validation using LaunchFast MCP and the LegacyX criteria. Use when the user wants a serious viability review for a keyword, niche, or adjacent niche expansion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Superloopy's lightweight strict-evidence loop for Codex tasks that need durable progress, criteria, and artifact-backed completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide real-build acceptance: literal taps, real inputs, expected outcomes, worst case first, one sitting. Triggers: testflight, human pass, acceptance test, before we ship, what should I test, release checklist, device test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous development with experimental self-correction. Iterates through quality gates until antifragile or blocked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run quality checks, and create follow-up tasks for gaps. Use before merging or to audit delivered work. Invoked as /agiflow:review-work <work-unit-or-task>. Uses get_work_unit, get_task, update_task, create_task, create_task_comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a single Todo task through In Progress to Review, meeting every acceptance criterion with tests and vibe-lint checks. Refuses Planning-status tasks. Invoked as /agiflow:run-task <task>. Uses get_task, update_task, create_task_comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine an existing Agiflow task into an unambiguous, testable specification without expanding its intended outcome. Use when a task is vague, lacks acceptance criteria, has unclear scope or dependencies, or is not ready for backlog grooming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new deterministic scoring check in src/scoring/checks/ that evaluates config quality. Follows the Check[] return pattern, uses point constants from src/scoring/constants.ts, and integrates via filterChecksForTarget() in src/scoring/index.ts. Use when user says 'add scoring check', 'new check', 'modify scoring criteria', or works in src/scoring/checks/. Do NOT use for display changes or refactoring scoring logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and iterate custom add-ons/templates with tanstack add-on init, add-on compile, add-on dev, and tanstack create --dev-watch, including sync loop preconditions, watch-path validation, and project metadata constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate tasks to ANY CLI agent (claude, codex, aider, ...) running in a detached tmux session, with a race-safe done-signal protocol and multi-turn iteration. Use when delegating work to a non-Claude CLI agent, when the user says "tmux delegate", "run agent in tmux", "delegate to codex/aider", or when executor work should run in an observable background terminal instead of the Agent tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a DataFusion Comet pull request that crosses the JVM/native boundary, touching Arrow C Data or C Stream interface code, batch export and import, CometExecIterator, ScanExec, NativeUtil, CometVector subclasses, or jni_api. Load alongside review-comet-pr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a new Spark expression in DataFusion Comet. Walks through cloning latest Spark master to study the canonical implementation, checking the upstream datafusion-spark crate before writing native code, building the Comet serde and Rust wire-up from the contributor guide, then running audit-comet-expression to drive a test-coverage iteration loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a DataFusion Comet pull request that touches native or JVM columnar shuffle, the shuffle writers and readers, partitioning, the Arrow IPC block format, shuffle compression, or the Celeborn integration. Load alongside review-comet-pr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a DataFusion Comet pull request that touches Iceberg writes, the split-operator write plan (IcebergWriteStrategy, IcebergWriteExec, IcebergCommitExec), the native Iceberg writer (CometIcebergWriteExec, iceberg_write.rs, iceberg_partition_path.rs), its eligibility gate (CometIcebergNativeWrite), or the iceberg-rust pin. Load alongside review-comet-pr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI. Also the default writing standard for all agent output: 80% ASD-STE100 controlled language plus the format ladder (prose, diagram, HTML page, explainer video).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WCAG 2.2 Accessibility Audit skill that systematically evaluates web pages against 8 core Success Criteria (1.1.1, 1.4.3, 1.4.11, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.7, 4.1.2) using accessibility tree inspection and visual analysis. Use this skill when you need to perform accessibility testing/auditing on a live webpage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。