1,539 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
On-demand journal peer review simulation expert — supports 7 research paradigms (experimental/computational/empirical_survey/interpretive/mixed_methods/systematic_review/interdisciplinary) with 6-step review workflow, outputting targeted revision suggestions based on journal-specific review standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set, inspect up to 30 full texts, build a concept-reference knowledge graph, and write a literature review grounded only in the final included references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent-native design engine that makes AI do more useful work: route the prompt, fork a template, weave IFQ ambient craft, verify the artifact, and only install export tooling when requested. One prompt -> shippable HTML, with optional MP4 / GIF / PPTX / PDF / SVG. Triggers include prototype, hi-fi mockup, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand from scratch, design critique, mp4/gif export, 60fps, keynote, PPTX, A-vs-B benchmark. Do not use for production web apps, SEO-critical sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user asks for an HTML-first visual design deliverable or design judgment: interactive prototype, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, landing page, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand system, design critique, multi-variant exploration, or export to MP4, GIF, PPTX, PDF, or SVG. It is optimized to make AI agents do the routing, template selection, verification, and export prep so humans spend less time prompt-engineering. Do not use for production web apps, SEO sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MATLAB R2026a data analysis workflow for tables, timetables, statistics, fitting, optimization-assisted analysis, visualization, report artifacts, and reproducible paper figures. Use whenever the user asks MATLAB to analyze data, plot results, fit models, process CSV/Excel/MAT files, or reproduce figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MATLAB R2026a agentic workflow router. Use this whenever the user asks for MATLAB, Simulink, .m/.mlx/.slx work, toolbox-driven engineering, paper reproduction, simulation, code generation, data analysis, control, robotics, signal/image/AI workflows, or wants an end-to-end automated MATLAB task with validation. For Simulink tasks on this machine, default to a visible workflow: open MATLAB/Simulink windows first so the user can watch modeling, simulation, tuning, and plotting progress.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a complete SPSS or SPSS-MCP empirical research workflow: organize source data, prepare datasets, design variables and models, run SPSS analyses, export Chinese result paragraphs and tables, write a Chinese LaTeX paper, and compile the final PDF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants papers to consider for a graph gap or missing evidence need.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to add source identity from PDF, URL, arXiv, DOI, note, experiment result, manual reference, or Zotero item into a Research Pilot project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a graph gap or Evidence Need should become a targeted paper-search contract or candidate lead list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a project-local paper dossier should produce graph delta JSON proposals and run through the human-gated delta loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts LaTeX article-class .tex documents to Quarto .qmd format for multi-format publishing (HTML, PDF, Word). Use when asked to convert, port, migrate, or translate a .tex LaTeX file to Quarto; when porting an academic paper or manuscript from LaTeX to Quarto; when a .tex document needs to render to HTML, Word, or Typst PDF. Covers preamble → YAML front matter, section headings, text formatting, math, citations (natbib/biblatex), cross-references, figures, tables, lists, footnotes, hyperlinks, and special characters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Onderhoudt de inhoud van de roadmap op /roadmap — werkpakketten toevoegen, wijzigen, verplaatsen of verwijderen, onderzoeksvragen schrijven en aan een sectie van het position paper koppelen, en RFC's koppelen die het ontwerp beschrijven. Gebruik dit bij "voeg een werkpakket toe", "verplaats X naar de Hoe-fase", "zet er een onderzoeksvraag bij", of het bijwerken van fases, disciplines en swimlanes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing or publishing a local project as a clean GitHub repository. Covers new repositories, private staging releases, public README cleanup, updates to existing remotes, and research-code packaging without datasets, checkpoints, papers, or generated artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when research writing, reviews, rebuttals, or related-work planning needs academic evidence. Searches literature, screens candidate papers, audits novelty and missing work, verifies DOI/BibTeX/reference metadata and citation authenticity, and checks whether sources support the stated claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when exploring, continuing, or accepting a deep-learning or computer-science research idea. Converts claims into pilot-first experiment matrices covering diagnostics, failure analysis, authorized execution, evaluation, and paper-story viability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to track, scan, monitor, digest, or maintain a reading queue for new papers from top journals, Nature/Science/Cell/PNAS families, or any research field. Works with any discipline — ecology, environment, CS, medicine, physics, social sciences, etc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and maintain a persistent, interlinked markdown wiki (second brain / research notebook / personal knowledge base) from raw sources. Use this skill when the user wants to ingest an article / paper / note / URL / PDF into their wiki, ask a question against their wiki, lint/health-check their wiki, or set up a new wiki from a folder. Triggers include phrases like "add this to my wiki", "ingest this", "file this article", "update my notes with this", "what does my wiki say about X", "health-check my wiki", "find stale/orphan pages", or any workflow involving a `raw/` source folder, `wiki/` markdown folder, `index.md`, or `log.md`. Compatible with Obsidian vaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit essays, reports, literature reviews, dissertations, proposals, and source-backed assignments for high-score academic quality. Use when the user asks whether a paper can get a high grade, wants teacher/rubric feedback addressed, needs a pre-submission review, or needs checks for strict rubric compliance, academic standards, prompt/rubric alignment, argument quality, comparative analysis, evidence hierarchy, table/figure integration, citation specificity, conclusion strength, academic language, source-claim integrity, or evidence boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Revise an already accepted article, essay, paper, statement, or manuscript under strict minimal-change constraints while still satisfying reviewer comments, supervisor feedback, or requested edits. Use when the user asks for minimal edits, smallest necessary changes, preserve the current voice, keep the existing style, avoid broad rewriting, or implement requested revisions without unnecessary polishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replace sentence-by-sentence revised or paraphrased text back into an original paper or document while preserving the original formatting, typography, paragraph settings, citation layout, and document conventions as the source of truth. Use when the user provides revised text that maps back to original sentences, paragraphs, sections, or the whole document, but may also contain clear local sentence merges or splits, and asks to replace it back into the source, keep the original formatting, do sentence-by-sentence replacement, preserve original formatting, or only swap wording without rewriting the document. Only allow minimal edits to the rewritten text when fixing citation formatting, restoring protected original content, restoring the original person reference, or minimally splitting/merging text back into original sentence slots; otherwise do not improve grammar, style, logic, or wording.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。