「risk」の検索結果

Evaluate vendors with comparison matrices, TCO analysis, risk assessment, reference check templates, and negotiation strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze customer churn patterns, identify at-risk accounts, create retention playbooks, and build early warning systems

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Quarterly Business Reviews with account health scores, usage analytics, ROI analysis, expansion opportunities, and risk mitigation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate project status reports with RAG status, milestones, risks, blockers, resource utilization, and executive summaries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build business cases with cost-benefit analysis, ROI calculations, risk assessment, implementation timeline, and stakeholder analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI code reviewer grounded in classic software engineering books for catching design smells, coupling issues, and architectural risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered Claude Code skill that performs deep code review using formal logic and reasoning frameworks to detect bugs, anti-patterns, and security risks beyond what linters catch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a bundle-plugin for structural issues, version drift, skill quality, workflow integration, or security risks — before releasing, after changes, or after adding skills. Auto-detects scope (full project vs skill vs workflow)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze liquid markets with a strict ICT/SMC framework that combines multi-timeframe bias, liquidity sweeps, displacement, close-confirmed MSS/BOS, FVG/OB/Breaker/OTE retracements, premium-discount location, session timing, invalidation, targets, and risk-to-reward. Use for ICT chart reviews, live-market analysis, OHLCV scans, or validating a user's trade thesis. Return an auditable setup status and conditional plan; do not use for generic indicator analysis, order execution, or claims of proven institutional intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether a task deserves its own git worktree and, if chosen, run it end to end: branch from the integration branch rather than the current tree, keep the main working copy untouched while the task runs, compare the result against the untouched baseline before declaring it done, and prepare it for a pull request instead of merging. Use when a request says to do the work in a new worktree or branch, when a change is large or risky enough that the main tree should stay usable, when several tasks need to run in parallel on one repository, when a result has to be diffed against current behavior, and when deciding where screenshots, builds, and other artifacts produced in a worktree should end up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vulnerability and security scan (defensive, your own repo): dependency CVEs plus risky code patterns (secrets, injection, weak authz), severity x reachability triaged and remediated without suppressing. Complements the built-in /security-review. Triggers on "absolute audit", "security audit", "are we vulnerable", "scan for CVEs", "check for secrets/injection", "harden this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze open-source license compatibility, obligations, and compliance risks across project dependencies. Use when the user requests license analysis or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-model and harden AI agents, RAG systems, assistants, and tool-using workflows against direct, indirect, stored, cross-agent, and multimodal prompt injection. Use when reviewing an agent architecture, isolating untrusted content, constraining tools and egress, protecting secrets, adding injection-focused tests, investigating a suspected injection incident, or documenting residual prompt-injection risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit agent skills, plugins, prompts, manifests, scripts, dependencies, and bundled assets for provenance, prompt-injection, permission, execution, exfiltration, persistence, and update risk. Use when evaluating a third-party skill before installing, enabling, updating, publishing, or distributing it; reviewing an untrusted SKILL.md, agent configuration, MCP integration, archive, or repository; comparing a package with a known-good version; or investigating unexpected tool, network, credential, or filesystem behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Machine Learning Researcher. Use when a task calls for Machine Learning Researcher judgment. Reasons from population risk, double descent, and inductive bias; enforces sacred test sets, hierarchical ablations, nested CV, and HELM/Dynabench-aware benchmarking; reports with NeurIPS and Pineau reproducibility checklists while treating leakage, meta-overfitting, benchmark contamination, Goodhart gaming, and seed variance as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Gerontologist. Use when a task calls for Gerontologist judgment. Reasons from senescence hallmarks, frailty, multi-morbidity, and life-course exposures through validated instruments (Fried phenotype, Rockwood CFS, SPPB/gait speed), epigenetic clocks (Horvath, PhenoAge, GrimAge), competing-risk survival (Fine-Gray), and NIA cohorts (HRS, NHATS, ITP) while treating survivor bias, differential attrition, healthy-volunteer bias, and frail-subset toxicity as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Genetic Counselor. Use when a task calls for Genetic Counselor judgment. Reasons from probabilistic penetrance, Bayesian pretest probability, and patient autonomy through three-generation pedigrees, ACMG/AMP variant criteria, ClinVar/ClinGen/gnomAD, NCCN and CPIC guidelines, and cascade-testing protocols while treating VUS over-upgraded to pathogenic, screening-versus-diagnostic confusion (NIPT vs amnio/CVS), and unaddressed psychosocial and GINA discrimination risk as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Environmental Health Scientist. Use when a task calls for Environmental Health Scientist judgment. Reasons from source–pathway–receptor chains, classical vs Berkson exposure error, and tiered biomonitoring (NHANES/BEs); runs STROBE-grade epi, IRIS/OEHHA/ATSDR risk assessment, AERMOD/CALPUFF, EPHT/EJSCREEN, and HIA while treating surrogate misclassification, mobility bias, and detection≠harm as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Gene Therapy Scientist. Use when a task calls for Gene Therapy Scientist judgment. Reasons from vector biology, biodistribution, linked potency, and integration risk through ddPCR titer, empty/full analytics, ISA and off-target NGS (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq), and ICH S12 nonclinical design while treating pre-existing capsid neutralizing antibodies, RCV/RCA/RCR positivity, gonadal vector genome, and oligoclonal VCN expansion as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Critical Care Researcher. Use when a task calls for Critical Care Researcher judgment. Reasons from acute physiology trajectories, modular organ dysfunction, and cluster-aware trial design through APACHE/SAPS/SOFA scoring, Berlin/Sepsis-3/KDIGO definitions, MIMIC-IV phenotyping, and target-trial emulation with clone-censor-weighting while treating immortal-time bias, cluster contamination, competing risks from early death, and sepsis-phenotype cohort inflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Bioprocess Microbiologist. Use when a task calls for Bioprocess Microbiologist judgment. Reasons from kLa/OTR–OUR balance, fed-batch μ control, off-gas RQ, van't Riet scale-up, and contamination (phage, bioburden, adventitious agents); treats antifoam kLa penalty, exponential-feed open-loop risk, and SUB vs stainless transfer as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Biomedical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Biomedical Engineer judgment. Reasons from ISO 14971 risk management, ISO 10993 biocompatibility matrices, ASTM F/ISO 14242 mechanical and wear testing, and FDA 510(k) substantial equivalence; treats stress shielding, UHMWPE osteolysis, F2129 corrosion artifacts, and predicate/material mismatches as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。