「ble」の検索結果

Measure what matters. Event tracking design, attribution modeling, funnel analysis, experimentation platforms. The complete guide to understanding what your users actually do, not what you hope they do. Good analytics is invisible until you need it. Then it's the difference between guessing and knowing. Use when "analytics, tracking, events, funnel, conversion, attribution, segment, amplitude, mixpanel, posthog, ab testing, experiment, cohort, retention, measure, metrics, analytics, tracking, events, funnel, conversion, attribution, data" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The orchestration layer for AI-native creative production. This skill coordinates multiple AI tools—video, image, audio, digital humans, effects—into cohesive campaigns, productions, and creative systems. As AI tools proliferate, the challenge shifts from "can we create this?" to "how do we orchestrate these capabilities into something coherent?" The AI Creative Director thinks in systems, not tools. In pipelines, not one-offs. In brand consistency across AI-generated assets. This is where creative vision meets technical orchestration. The AI Creative Director doesn't just use AI tools—they compose them into creative instruments that produce at scales and speeds previously impossible. Use when "AI creative director, orchestrate AI, AI campaign, multi-tool, AI workflow, AI pipeline, coordinate AI, AI production, AI creative system, full AI production, AI at scale, orchestration, creative-direction, ai-production, workflow, pipeline, multi-tool, scale, quality-control" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The science of learning through controlled experimentation. A/B testing isn't about picking winners—it's about building a culture of validated learning and reducing the cost of being wrong. This skill covers experiment design, statistical rigor, feature flagging, analysis, and building experimentation into product development. The best experimenters know that every test, positive or negative, teaches something valuable. Use when "a/b test, experiment, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, feature flag, variant, control, treatment, p-value, conversion rate, test winner, split test, experimentation, testing, statistics, feature-flags, hypothesis, growth, optimization, learning, validation" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive AI-native brand asset systems that maintain consistency across all AI-generated content. Train AI tools on brand guidelines, create reusable prompt libraries, and manage visual/voice assets at scale. Use when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class expertise in measuring, attributing, and optimizing AI-generated content performance. Combining data science rigor with content strategy intelligence to answer the questions traditional content analytics can't: Is AI content performing? Which AI variations convert? What's the true ROI of AI vs traditional content creation? This isn't vanity metrics for robots. This is the discipline of proving AI content drives business outcomes - and using that data to make AI content systems better, faster, and more profitable. Built on the principles of companies like Jasper, Copy.ai, and Notion who've scaled AI content operations with measurement as the foundation. Use when "ai content performance, ai content analytics, measure ai content, ai content roi, ai vs human content, ai content attribution, ai content testing, ai variation testing, ai content dashboard, ai content metrics, prompt performance, ai content conversion, ai content quality score, content velocity, ai content efficiency, ai-content, analytics, measurement, attribution, roi, ab-testing, performance, optimization, data-driven, content-analytics" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has positioning and wants a reusable Xiaohongshu topic/title bank instead of asking AI to freely brainstorm, especially to map topics to user needs such as emotional resonance, growth proof, new insight, learning value, or identity expression. Trigger phrases: "选题库", "标题公式", "每天发什么", "批量选题", "爆款需求", "XHS topic bank", "title formulas". Do not use before account positioning and target audience are known.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a Xiaohongshu niche and needs to find, compare, and extract reusable content structures from low-follower high-performing posts, or diagnose why a post did or did not become a breakout using click rate, retention, and interaction signals. Trigger phrases: "找对标", "低粉爆款", "拆爆款", "内容骨架", "点击率", "停留时长", "互动率", "competitor pattern", "viral post structure". Do not use before the monetization direction is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a professional, client-ready PDF SEO report from a saved DataForSEO-powered audit. Produces a polished PDF with score gauges, prioritized action plan, keyword opportunity tables, and competitive landscape — ready to send to a client.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Black-box QA audit of slop-guard across MCP, CLI, fit, docs, agent workflows, and writing-effectiveness. Files GitHub issues for real problems found.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install a per-turn canary signal (e.g. starting every reply with the user's name and a turn counter) so silent context degradation becomes visible the moment it happens, and run a recovery protocol when the canary trips. Use when the user mentions a "canary", "context canary", or "canary check", asks to detect context rot / compaction / drift, says "you stopped using my name" or "did you lose context", asks "how degraded is your context", or wants an early-warning system for long agent sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stage and commit with flexible intent parsing. Accepts file/folder scope, free-text description, amend, or any combination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the vault for structural issues: unresolved wikilinks, orphan notes, dead-end notes, and Obsidian sync conflicts. Optional --fix flags create stubs or surface fixable issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and edit Obsidian Bases (.base files) with views, filters, formulas, and summaries. Use when working with .base files, creating database-like views of notes, or when the user mentions Bases, table views, card views, filters, or formulas in Obsidian.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits tests for concurrency safety — race conditions, shared mock state, cleanup ordering. Use when writing tests that involve goroutines, async operations, or shared mutable state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a behavioral scenario acceptance matrix for comprehensive test coverage planning. Maps user scenarios to acceptance criteria with stable IDs. Use when planning test coverage for a complex feature, before a release or milestone review, or when someone asks what is tested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures reusable knowledge after work is done — learnings from feedback or failures, resolved bugs (symptom, root cause, prevention), and recurring code patterns — into the project's persistent memory file. Use after feedback, a non-trivial bug fix, a failed attempt, or the third repetition of a pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bret Taylor 视角. Sierra 联合创始人 / CEO, OpenAI 董事会主席 (2024-), ex-Salesforce co-CEO, Google Maps 联合创造者. B2B SaaS enterprise 派代表 / outcome-based pricing 第一手提倡者 / brand-as-moat 在 agent 时代重新阐述者. 把 monetize-agents 语境从 "卖软件 access" 换成 "卖 outcome — 客户问题解决一次收一次费", 把 product 设计从 "feature breadth" 换成 "vertical depth + measurable outcome + procurement-grade trust". 用途: 当用户问 "agent 该怎么定价 / per-seat 还是 per-outcome / B2B agent 怎么 GTM / enterprise 0 到 1 / vertical 还是 horizontal / design partner 怎么搭 / 一开始要不要融大钱" 类问题时, 用 Bret Taylor 视角先把 "outcome 可不可测量 + vertical 是哪个 + 第一批 design partner 是谁" 盘清楚, 再给定价 / GTM / 融资判断. 当用户提到 "Bret Taylor" "Sierra" "outcome-based pricing" "deflection" "vertical agent" "design partner" "enterprise agent" "B2B agent GTM" "agent 定价" "agent procurement" 时使用. 即使用户只是说 "用 Sierra 思路看一下" 也应触发.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

青少年心理健康教育 (Youth Mental Health Education) Master OS — automated mastery of Youth Mental Health Education: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Youth Mental Health Education problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「青少年心理」「心理健康教育」「校园心理」「学校心理辅导」「社交情感学习」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

风险投资人 / 早期投资判断(GP + Principal — Deal sourcing / 尽调 / 估值与 term sheet / 投后服务 / 退出 + LP 关系与 fundraising — 涵盖 US 美元基金 + 国内 RMB / 美元基金) (Venture capital / early-stage investor — 风险投资人(GP / Partner / Principal)的早期投资判断与基金运营实战) Master OS — automated mastery of Venture capital / early-stage investor — 风险投资人(GP / Partner / Principal)的早期投资判断与基金运营实战: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Venture capital / early-stage investor — 风险投资人(GP / Partner / Principal)的早期投资判断与基金运营实战 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「VC」「venture capital」「风险投资」「early stage」「天使投资」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在小红书做『AI 赛道』内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写文案、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) AI 赛道选题 — AI 工具测评 / AI 绘画 / AI 教程与 prompt / AI 副业变现 / AI 资讯解读 / AI 效率，按小红书用户(偏年轻女性 + 泛知识)重构选题; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 封面(第一眼/大字报/对比图)、标题(数字/痛点/好奇缺口/关键词前置)、正文(钩子开头/分点/口语化/emoji/利他价值)、标签与 SEO 关键词、CTA 与互动引导、人设 voice; (c) 内容制作工作流 — 选题(对标爆款/找选题)→标题封面→脚本或正文→制作(图文/口播/录屏/数字人)→标签发布→数据复盘迭代; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 文案(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/GPT)、生图(即梦/MJ/可图)、口播数字人、剪辑(剪映)、封面(Canva/创可贴)、选题与 SEO(新红/千瓜/灰豚); (e) 平台机制与起号 — 推荐算法(收藏率/互动率/完播/搜索)、薯条投放、违禁词/限流/避坑、起号与涨粉、垂直度; (f) 变现(次要) — 蒲公英广告 / 知识付费 / 引流私域 / AI 工具带货。学派分歧: 图文 vs 短视频、干货教程 vs 测评种草 vs 资讯搬运、真人出镜 vs 数字人/无人起号、原创 vs 搬运洗稿、AI 全自动批量 vs AI 辅助精做。不含: 通用小红书运营(已有 xiaohongshu-ops skill, 本 skill 聚焦 AI 赛道 + 文案/内容生产)、电商带货全流程、其他平台、AI 工具本身的技术原理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在小红书做『AI 赛道』内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写文案、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) AI 赛道选题 — AI 工具测评 / AI 绘画 / AI 教程与 prompt / AI 副业变现 / AI 资讯解读 / AI 效率，按小红书用户(偏年轻女性 + 泛知识)重构选题; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 封面(第一眼/大字报/对比图)、标题(数字/痛点/好奇缺口/关键词前置)、正文(钩子开头/分点/口语化/emoji/利他价值)、标签与 SEO 关键词、CTA 与互动引导、人设 voice; (c) 内容制作工作流 — 选题(对标爆款/找选题)→标题封面→脚本或正文→制作(图文/口播/录屏/数字人)→标签发布→数据复盘迭代; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 文案(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/GPT)、生图(即梦/MJ/可图)、口播数字人、剪辑(剪映)、封面(Canva/创可贴)、选题与 SEO(新红/千瓜/灰豚); (e) 平台机制与起号 — 推荐算法(收藏率/互动率/完播/搜索)、薯条投放、违禁词/限流/避坑、起号与涨粉、垂直度; (f) 变现(次要) — 蒲公英广告 / 知识付费 / 引流私域 / AI 工具带货。学派分歧: 图文 vs 短视频、干货教程 vs 测评种草 vs 资讯搬运、真人出镜 vs 数字人/无人起号、原创 vs 搬运洗稿、AI 全自动批量 vs AI 辅助精做。不含: 通用小红书运营(已有 xiaohongshu-ops skill, 本 skill 聚焦 AI 赛道 + 文案/内容生产)、电商带货全流程、其他平台、AI 工具本身的技术原理。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在小红书做『AI 赛道』内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写文案、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) AI 赛道选题 — AI 工具测评 / AI 绘画 / AI 教程与 prompt / AI 副业变现 / AI 资讯解读 / AI 效率，按小红书用户(偏年轻女性 + 泛知识)重构选题; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 封面(第一眼/大字报/对比图)、标题(数字/痛点/好奇缺口/关键词前置)、正文(钩子开头/分点/口语化/emoji/利他价值)、标签与 SEO 关键词、CTA 与互动引导、人设 voice; (c) 内容制作工作流 — 选题(对标爆款/找选题)→标题封面→脚本或正文→制作(图文/口播/录屏/数字人)→标签发布→数据复盘迭代; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 文案(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/GPT)、生图(即梦/MJ/可图)、口播数字人、剪辑(剪映)、封面(Canva/创可贴)、选题与 SEO(新红/千瓜/灰豚); (e) 平台机制与起号 — 推荐算法(收藏率/互动率/完播/搜索)、薯条投放、违禁词/限流/避坑、起号与涨粉、垂直度; (f) 变现(次要) — 蒲公英广告 / 知识付费 / 引流私域 / AI 工具带货。学派分歧: 图文 vs 短视频、干货教程 vs 测评种草 vs 资讯搬运、真人出镜 vs 数字人/无人起号、原创 vs 搬运洗稿、AI 全自动批量 vs AI 辅助精做。不含: 通用小红书运营(已有 xiaohongshu-ops skill, 本 skill 聚焦 AI 赛道 + 文案/内容生产)、电商带货全流程、其他平台、AI 工具本身的技术原理。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「小红书 ai 博主」「小红书 ai 自媒体」「小红书 ai 赛道」「小红书爆款文案」「小红书 ai 教程」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。