1.5万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write or revise AI-learning-notes article pages in "寫文章模式" when the user asks for articles, technical articles, blog posts, bilingual versions, article formatting consistency, shared article-base alignment, responsive layout, summary/TOC decisions, contrast, or publishing-flow compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent context budget guard and artifact compression workflow. USE FOR: image-heavy QA, compare board review, screenshot batches, large keep/todo/task manifests, long notes handoff, and md/json diff summarization. Trigger this before reading or forwarding heavy artifacts when token growth is a risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPT Image 2 image generation workflow for this repo MCP server. Use for gpt-image-2, OpenAI image generation, concept art, UCUF reference exploration, UI icon, badge, card art, prompt drafting, transparent-background asset drafts, and saving generated images to local files under artifacts/ui-source or other workspace paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EDITOR PREVIEW SCREENSHOT SKILL — Capture the current Cocos Creator Editor window to a PNG file and inspect exactly what is already visible inside the Editor. USE FOR: visual symptoms when the user already has the target screen open in Cocos Editor / Editor Preview. DO NOT USE FOR: browser-driven QA, automatic browser target switching, reference-image comparison pipelines, compile errors, or pure log analysis. If the user wants browser screenshots, remind them to prepare the Browser Review environment and use cocos-preview-qa instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic Go concurrency - sync primitives, channel semantics, the select statement, and the standard channel patterns (cancellation/done-channel, fan-out/fan-in, pipeline, or-done, context, worker-pool). Use when writing or reviewing Go that spawns goroutines, shares state, or coordinates over channels, even if the user never says "concurrency" - e.g. data races, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, sync/context/select usage, or "make this parallel". Distilled from luk4z7/go-concurrency-guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare safe production launches — pre-launch checklist, monitoring, staged rollout, and rollback. Load when deploying to production, releasing a major change, opening beta access, or the user asks for a launch checklist, go-live plan, rollout strategy, or rollback plan. Not for local-only prototypes. Pairs with ci-cd-and-automation and app-security-hardening.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and resolve naming collisions, overlapping intent triggers, and insufficient intent diversity across the skill library. Load when a new skill is created (called by universal-skill-creator), during improvement passes (called by improve-skills), or when the user asks to deconflict skills, check for naming collisions, audit trigger overlap, review intent coverage, find duplicate triggers, check skill names, or says "are any skills too similar", "which skills overlap", "deconflict the library", "check for confusing skill names", "intent audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the project's technical health and identify "high-interest" debt. Load when the user asks to check code quality, find TODOs, assess project health, or prepare for a refactoring sprint. Also triggers on "technical debt audit", "where is the code messy", "assess project health", "find my hacks", or "identify tech debt". Essential for maintaining velocity in growing projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast, read-only health check across all skills in the library and produce a structured quality report — without modifying anything. Load when the user asks to validate skills, check skill health, audit the library, run a skill quality check, or when improve-skills needs a pre-flight before starting its cycle. Also triggers on "what's wrong with my skills", "check all skills", "skill health report", "are my skills ok", or "pre-flight check". Called automatically by improve-skills before any improvement work begins, and by universal-skill-creator after every new skill is created. Never modifies any file — only reads and reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Boyd's OODA loop to navigate fast-moving, uncertain, or competitive situations — Observe what is actually happening, Orient through mental models and context, Decide on the clearest path, Act quickly, then loop again. Load when the situation is changing faster than the current plan, when a competitive response is needed, when the user is stuck in analysis paralysis in a dynamic environment, when shipping under uncertainty, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a fast-moving / competitive frame. Triggers on "what should we do right now", "the situation is changing", "how do we respond to this", "competitive response", "we need to move fast", or "we're stuck deciding". Based on John Boyd's OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — adapted for product and business contexts (OODA Canvas 2026).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compress bloated project or global memory while preserving decisions, rationale, revisit triggers, provenance, and active user preferences. Load when memory exceeds budget, global memory is too large, session logs are repetitive, or before appending to an over-budget memory file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Promote project-specific memories into strict, small global memory only when they are cross-project, stable, useful, safe, and worth the global context cost. Load when the user says make this global, remember across projects, save this globally, or promote this learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, improve, and compress every skill in the repo using live research. Load when the user asks to improve skills, audit the skill library, upgrade existing skills, refresh with new research, do a skill health check, or says "improve all skills", "update the skill library", "skill audit", or "run an improvement pass". Applies live domain research, fixes structural gaps, checks for skill linking opportunities, then rewrites and resizes each skill. Supports TARGETED mode (`TARGET=<skill> [SKIP_RESEARCH=true]`) for single-skill fixes, including learn-from-chat restructure escalations. All skills are in scope including meta skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load bounded working context at the start of a coding session. FIRES ON EVERY FIRST USER MESSAGE in a fresh session, regardless of content — including bare greetings ("hi", "hello", "hey"), task-only openers, or "let's start". Also triggers on: "fresh session", "session start", "first message in a new thread", "new chat", "cold start", "begin work in this repo", "starting work", "continue from prior session", "what were we working on", "resume", "what happened last time", "load memory", "recall context", "create a handoff", "prior session context", "latest handoff", "current state", "decision context". Skip ONLY if the user explicitly says "fresh start" or "ignore prior context". Self no-ops if invoked mid-session when context is already loaded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the earliest decisive failure in an agent run trace and propose an evidence-backed targeted repair. Load when a run failed, results are wrong, or the user asks what went wrong in an agent session. Also triggers on "localize the fault", "first incorrect step", "debug this run", "trace attribution", "why did the agent fail", or after run-trace captures errors. Pairs with debug-and-fix for code defects and dynamic-routing for plan faults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strip a problem to its irreducible fundamental truths and rebuild the solution from the ground up — free from analogy, convention, and inherited assumptions. Load when the user feels constrained by how something has always been done, when existing solutions feel expensive or inefficient for no good reason, when the user asks to think from first principles, challenge the fundamentals, or rebuild this from scratch. Also triggers on "why does it have to work this way", "what are the actual constraints here", "ignore what everyone else does", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a convention-break frame. Based on Aristotle's first principles method, popularised by Musk and Feynman. Produces genuinely novel solutions by eliminating convention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create focused role prompts for agents in multi-agent topologies. Load when agent-builder needs role prompts for agents, or when a user asks to "create an agent prompt", "write a role prompt", "define agent identity", "write an agent role", "prompt for this agent", "write instructions for this agent", "agent persona". Scope: agent role prompts only (v1). System prompts, task prompts, and skill invocation prompts are future TODOs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, completeness, bugs, edge cases, and quality. Load when the user explicitly asks to review code, check a PR, review a diff, audit recent changes, or verify an implementation matches requirements. Also triggers on "review this code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "did this implement correctly", "audit this diff", or any explicit request for a formal code review. Do NOT load for "review changes for context" or "review what happened" — those are requests to read code, not to perform a formal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair and verify cross-references between SKILL.md files after a skill is created, renamed, removed, or restructured. Ensures every skill that calls another skill references the correct name, and every skill that is called has accurate "Called by" context. Load after universal-skill-creator creates a skill, after improve-skills completes a cycle, after a skill is renamed or removed, or when the user asks to fix cross-references, sync skill links, repair broken skill references, update skill cross-links, check skill references, or "are cross-links correct".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score LLM and agent outputs using LLM-as-judge techniques — direct scoring against rubrics or pairwise comparison between two outputs. Includes built-in bias mitigation for position bias, length bias, and self-enhancement bias. Load when the user asks to score an output, judge a response, evaluate against a rubric, compare two outputs, do direct scoring, run pairwise comparison, or says "rate this", "which response is better", "score this against the rubric", "judge this output", "LLM as judge this". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set a deliberate visual direction before any UI is built — the single biggest lever against generic AI output. Derives a posture from product-soul/PRD/specs, scores a curated archetype palette, then generates 2-3 GENUINELY DISTINCT directions and compares them side-by-side before committing to one. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, explore visual options, says "what should this look like", "make it feel like [Linear/Apple/ Duolingo]", "give me design directions", "explore some looks", or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-archetype. Sub-skill of frontend-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate one or more thinking frameworks to work through any problem, decision, document, or idea rigorously. Diagnoses which frameworks fit — inversion, pre-mortem, assumption-mapping, socratic, adversarial-hat — then guides the user through them in the right sequence. Load when the user asks for deep thinking, says "help me think through this properly", "apply your best thinking frameworks", "I need to think carefully before deciding", or "what thinking tools should I use here". Also the entry point for any complex problem where the right framework is unclear. Covers product decisions, engineering tradeoffs, personal decisions, strategy, creative challenges — any domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。