206 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
An adversarial job search that gets better as it goes. Set up a job-search workspace, search a careers board and score roles against the realistic applicant pool, build a resume and cover letter, review them with seven agents that return a verdict per submission channel, then write what the review finds back into the profile. Invoke with /slushpile and name what you want to do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a seven-agent adversarial pipeline against a resume and cover letter before submission. Produces channel-conditional verdicts anchored to the realistic applicant pool, separates materials quality from submission expected value, and ends with a contrarian pass that can overturn the verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, or deploying Solidity smart contracts — token contracts, signature-gated claim systems, merkle-gated staking vaults, allocation modules, role-based proxies, or factory patterns. Triggers on edits to `*.sol` files, `hardhat.config.*`, `foundry.toml`, deploy scripts, or mentions of "smart contract", "Solidity", "Web3", "EVM", "Hardhat", "Foundry", "ERC20/721/1155", "merkle", "staking", or "on-chain". For security audits and adversarial review see security-engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial implementation review based on Block's g3 dialectical autocoding research. Use when validating implementation completeness against requirements with fresh objectivity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a skeptical Claude review over the current diff or branch range.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when orchestrating Multi-Agent Debate (MAD), adversarial code reviews, or pull-request deliberation to enforce Response Anonymization, expert persona assignment, and weighted post-hoc voting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured methodology for adversarial thinking — generating attack scenarios, abuse cases, race conditions, and security edge cases against specs and implementations. Produces spec-level gap items, not code-level fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ship the day's work in one repo: triage new issues, review every open PR (description, visual recap, adversarial reviewer, shipping pre-flight and quality gate), merge only after GO, then post a status recap. Use for "ship it", "ship day", "merge the ready PRs", "end of work block".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, running, or judging an experiment on a Syntropic137 workflow - comparing prompt variants, fan-out vs single agent, adversarial cross-model review, model selection (can Haiku do this job), phase splits, or tool grants. Trigger phrases include "run a workflow experiment", "A/B the workflow", "does fan-out help", "which model for this phase", "is this prompt better", "measure review quality", "why did the workflow do that". Do NOT use for a one-off workflow run that is just doing work, for authoring a workflow that is not being compared against anything, or for debugging a single failed execution (that is ordinary debugging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial verification of one SDD Composy task in verify_required: reproduce every claim with fresh commands, build the truth table, refute stale evidence, and produce the verdict that gates complete. Use when review is done and the task claims to be finished — 'verificar a TASK-003', 'a task está pronta mesmo?', 'is this task really complete'. Do NOT use for QA, code review, or a general 'verify my work' outside an SDD task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three-layer verification pipeline for AI output. Extracts verifiable claims, finds supporting or contradicting sources via web search, runs adversarial review for hallucination patterns, and produces a structured verification report with source links for human review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
大きな機能開発や移行の目標を、複数回の作業に分けた実行計画にします。各工程の背景、依存関係、検証方法をまとめ、別のエージェントへの引き継ぎを支えます。
技術が苦手で不満を抱きやすい利用者になりきってアプリを試し、操作の分かりにくさや離脱の原因を発見。実際の改善課題と個人的な不満を分け、修正案をまとめます。
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive Anthropic's Claude Code CLI (`claude -p`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Codex. Use when you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Claude, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, hand off long-context planning, or fan out parallel agents. Covers the exact `claude -p` flags, permission modes, output capture, JSON/stream-json modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose one publication-grade multi-panel figure. Start from a one-line claim plus immutable data Artifact Version references, or inspect an existing figure and draft its outline directly. Plan a 12-column panel outline, delegate one worker per panel, compose and inspect the result, then run at most three adversarial review rounds while regenerating only affected panels. For a standalone plot use `figure-style`; for whole-paper figure ordering use `paper-narrative`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OWASP compliance, vulnerability scanning, and adversarial red team testing — use for security reviews
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。