288 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Optimize Apache Spark jobs with partitioning, caching, shuffle optimization, and memory tuning. Use when improving Spark performance, debugging slow jobs, or scaling data processing pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build production Apache Airflow DAGs with best practices for operators, sensors, testing, and deployment. Use when creating data pipelines, orchestrating workflows, or scheduling batch jobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build scalable data pipelines, modern data warehouses, and real-time streaming architectures. Implements Apache Spark, dbt, Airflow, and cloud-native data platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and Iceberg), establishing metadata governance with Knowledge Catalog aspect types, or grounding agentic IDEs (VS Code, Antigravity) by using the Google Cloud Data Agent Kit. Don't use for provisioning borderless data lakehouse infrastructure (use google-cloud-solution-agentic-ai-borderless-data-lakehouse instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers requirements and designs a borderless open data lakehouse using Lakehouse for Apache Iceberg and BigQuery data agents. Use when architecting multi-cloud storage infrastructure (Cloud Storage, AWS S3, Azure Blob), establishing ingestion and AI serving subsystems, configuring Cross-Cloud Interconnect, or deploying Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and BigQuery data agents. Don't use for single-cloud data warehouses, or when the focus is on Knowledge Catalog metadata governance and Spark-driven IDE analytics workflows (use google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement, fix, refactor, or remove repository code under required scope, non-regression, verification, and review gates. Use whenever a task may change a production, test, script, or other implementation artifact, including build logic, generated source, and behavior-affecting configuration. Also use it alongside a specialized code-changing Skill. Do not use for read-only analysis or review, diagnosis-only work, or prose-only changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data pipeline expert for ETL, Apache Spark, Airflow, dbt, and data quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code with Doris-specific checklists
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run clang-tidy on newly added/modified BE C++ code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Doris docker-based regression tests from a clean package
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix BE (C++) code formatting issues using clang-format
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix FE (Java) code style issues using Checkstyle
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register, extend, or audit instructions in the table-driven T.ptx dialect (python/tvm/backend/cuda/ptx/table.py), and move the table to a newer PTX ISA version. Use when adding a PTX instruction or qualifier, widening an operand domain, fixing a ptxas certification failure, or checking the table's comments against the PTX ISA document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing Spark jobs, debugging performance issues, or configuring cluster settings for Apache Spark applications, distributed data processing pipelines, or big data workloads. Invoke to write DataFrame transformations, optimize Spark SQL queries, implement RDD pipelines, tune shuffle operations, configure executor memory, process .parquet files, handle data partitioning, or build structured streaming analytics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine bug patterns from any git repository. Discovers bug-fix commits via git log heuristics, analyzes each in parallel with subagents, writes individual analysis files, and synthesizes a generalized PATTERNS.md with repo-specific details stripped. Invoke explicitly with /bug-archaeology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use git heatmap analysis to identify high-churn files and lines as candidates for thorough review or bug hunting. Works for PR reviews, security audits, bug hunts, or any code analysis task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep code analysis with ASCII visualizations showing structure, flow, and state transitions. Use when analyzing patches/diffs, explaining classes or subsystems, understanding code architecture, reviewing changes for inconsistencies, or when asked to visualize how code works. Provides before/after diagrams, data/control flow, concurrency analysis, assumptions, and failure modes. Triggers on explain this patch/code/class, how does X work, show me the flow, visualize this change, code review requests, or proactive analysis during PR reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep file-focused code review for correctness bugs. Unlike shallow-review which runs 6 specialists in parallel across the entire patch, deep-review focuses on user-specified files with full pattern catalogs (500+ patterns), codebase investigation, and source-level context gathering. Use when: the user specifies particular files for focused review, a shallow review flagged areas that need deeper investigation, reviewing critical-path code changes, examining complex serialization/lifecycle/state-machine changes. The user instructs which files to focus on (typically a subset of files in the patch).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-pass deep code review for large patches (1000+ LOC) that maximizes real bug detection. Orchestrates targeted-review, shallow-review, and deep-review in parallel across all HIGH and MEDIUM risk files and commits: understands the feature holistically, splits by file and commit, runs deep review on every HIGH/MEDIUM file, targeted review across the same scope, and per-commit shallow review, followed by cross-cut consistency checks. Use when: reviewing a large patch (feature branch, multi-commit, or single large diff, 1000+ LOC), doing a thorough pre-merge review, or when shallower reviews miss bugs due to patch size. Triggers on: "review this branch", "review these commits", "review this feature", "mega review", "thorough review", "full review of X commits", or when the user specifies a commit range or feature for review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write minimal, reliable bug reproducers (repros) for any project. Use when: (1) a bug report or issue needs a test that reliably demonstrates the failure, (2) converting a described failure scenario into runnable code, (3) minimizing an existing complex test to its essential trigger conditions. Covers the full repro workflow: failure characterization, scope selection, writing the repro, verifying it fails for the right reason, and minimizing to the smallest possible trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shallow (quick) ensemble bug-finding review using 6 specialist agents in parallel. Each specialist reviews the same patch through a different lens: Logic & Types, Boundaries & I/O, Concurrency & State, Resources & Serialization, Absence Analysis, and API Completeness. Findings are merged and deduplicated. Best for: quick first-pass review of patches, triage of diffs, broad surface-level bug scan. For deeper file-focused review with full pattern catalogs and codebase investigation, use the deep-review skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, run, and verify TLA+ and PlusCal formal specifications. Use for modeling distributed systems, protocols, concurrent algorithms, state machines. Can compose specs from code, find divergences between spec and implementation, spot concurrency bugs and invariant violations. Use when asked to "write a TLA+ spec", "model check", "verify protocol", "find race conditions", or "formal verification".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。