「arxiv」の検索結果

Download a small corpus of open-access arXiv survey/review PDFs about agentic systems and extract text for style learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Claude Code CLI to consult Claude and delegate coding tasks for prototyping, debugging, and code review. Supports multi-turn sessions via SESSION_ID. Optimized for low-token, file/line-based handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-process LaTeX project prose to improve readability through varied sentence and paragraph lengths. Removes filler phrases and unnecessary transitions while preserving all citations and semantic meaning. Use after drafting is complete, when sections read as monotonous or blocky.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Gemini CLI to consult Gemini and delegate coding tasks for prototyping, debugging, and code review. Supports multi-turn sessions via SESSION_ID. Optimized for low-token, file/line-based handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategies for searching scientific literature across PubMed, arXiv, Google Scholar, and AI-assisted tools. Covers PICO framework for clinical questions, three-tiered search (database-specific, AI-assisted, content extraction), PubMed field tags and MeSH, boolean query construction, and full-text extraction. Use when planning a literature search or choosing a search tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs multi-source research across GitHub, HN, Reddit, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar. Use when surveying a technical topic across multiple channels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when users ask to 找文献、做文献检索、查论文、查临床试验、核验引用、去重文献、设计 PubMed/MeSH 检索式、追踪上下游引文、解析 DOI/PMID/PMCID/arXiv/OpenAlex/Semantic Scholar/NCT ID， 或导出 RIS、BibTeX、NBIB、ENW；also use for multi-source academic search, citation verification, citation graphs, trial registration search, research workflows, or DeepSeek Harness academic-search MCP setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a self-contained, beautifully styled HTML analysis of an academic paper. Use when the user provides an arXiv link, paper URL, PDF, or asks to analyze a research paper. Produces a standalone HTML file with structured sections (Problem, Translation/Analogy, Architecture, Key Results, Verdict), embedded figures, and responsive design. Trigger words include 读论文, 分析论文, paper analysis, paper review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic literature review across multiple arXiv papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a paper audited for integrity issues — image misuse, numerical anomalies, logical gaps — and needs a reviewable evidence report. Works on external papers (PDF / DOI / arXiv) and on outputs from a local paper-writer run. Single-stage skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Papers With Code CLI (`pwc`) for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, frameworks, and benchmark leaderboards, and submitting authenticated paper edits through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, `pwc`, or `pwc-cli`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Papers With Code MCP tools for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, and frameworks, and inspecting benchmark leaderboards with model-size and metric filters through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, the PwC MCP server, or paperswithcode.co/mcp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources with Firecrawl Research, using semantic paper search, related-paper expansion, and in-body verification over Firecrawl's paper index — largely biomedical and life-science literature from PubMed, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, plus arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math. Use when the user wants a literature review, systematic review, survey of studies, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from scholarly and industry publications, including clinical, drug, gene, disease, epidemiology, and public-health topics. Prefer this over a general web-research workflow whenever the evidence base is published papers rather than web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to batch-download academic PDFs with ref-downloader — either ALL references of one paper (Mode A: DOI or PDF input), OR a custom batch of papers (Mode B: DOI/title/arXiv-PMID list, or abstract query like "Author X's recent papers"). Not for one-off PDFs, paper search, or Zotero import.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic deep research via RivalSearchMCP. 9 tools: 5-engine web search (DuckDuckGo/Bing/Yahoo/Mojeek/Wikipedia), 9-platform social search (Reddit/HN/StackOverflow/Dev.to/Medium/ProductHunt/Bluesky/Lobste.rs/Lemmy), 5-source news (Google/Bing/Guardian/GDELT/DDG), 5 academic DBs (OpenAlex/CrossRef/arXiv/PubMed/EuropePMC), GitHub search, website mapping, content extraction with OCR, and research topic synthesis. No API keys required. Use when the user needs web research, competitive analysis, content discovery, or academic paper search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources with Firecrawl Research, using semantic paper search, related-paper expansion, and in-body verification over Firecrawl's paper index — largely biomedical and life-science literature from PubMed, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, plus arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math. Use when the user wants a literature review, systematic review, survey of studies, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from scholarly and industry publications, including clinical, drug, gene, disease, epidemiology, and public-health topics. Prefer this over a general web-research workflow whenever the evidence base is published papers rather than web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the Semantic Scholar academic corpus through AI2's Asta MCP server: keyword or title search with venue and date filters, who-cited-a-paper traversal, author profiles and publications, DOI/arXiv/PMID lookup, and ~500-word full-text snippets for evidence, with citation counts and h-index. Use when the user asks for papers on a topic, who cited a paper, an author's work, recent literature since a date, or a venue-scoped paper list. Requires the Asta MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts paper recommendations from social-media posts and online articles (小红书 / Xiaohongshu / RedNote, 微信公众号 / WeChat Official Accounts, Twitter / X threads, Reddit posts, Bilibili videos, blog posts, newsletters, Jina Reader URLs), identifies the underlying academic papers, locates the authoritative original sources (arXiv, conference proceedings, DOI), and triages relevance to the user's research before any library action. Use when the user forwards a social-media link, screenshot, or article that mentions a paper / method / model, asks to "find the original paper" from a blog or thread, shares a 调研贴 / 论文推荐 / paper recommendation post, or wants to evaluate whether a buzz-worthy paper is worth reading before adding it to Zotero.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LaTeX document authoring with arXiv submission best practices, Overleaf patterns, and academic publishing conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。