「authority」の検索結果

Use when deciding WHERE to point SEO effort, not how to write a page. Triggers: a new site or brand with no rankings and no authority ("cold start", "starting from zero", "nobody knows us"), deciding what to double down on, a page or cluster that ranks but earns nothing, hunting emerging or newly-coined keywords before competitors arrive, "should we build a cluster or one page", "what do we write next", "we get impressions but no clicks", "our traffic plateaued despite publishing", whether to chase a head term at all, or turning any of it into recurring automation. Also use when asked why an SEO effort stalled despite consistent output. NOT for writing an article, keyword expansion mechanics, or auditing a single tactic for penalty risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) in a given domain by combining web research with LinkedIn post search. Given a company/idea and target domain, generates authority keywords, searches LinkedIn posts to find prolific authors with high engagement, and merges with web-researched influencers. Use when someone wants to "find influencers in X space" or "who are the KOLs for Y industry."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull real SEO metrics for any domain using Apify scrapers for Semrush and Ahrefs data. Gets domain authority, organic traffic estimates, keyword rankings, backlink profiles, top performing pages, and auto-discovers competitors from keyword overlap. No Semrush/Ahrefs subscription needed — uses Apify actors that scrape public pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Godot 4 game goes online or co-op: host and join with ENet, WebSocket for a web build, RPCs (@rpc, rpc_id, any_peer), MultiplayerSpawner and MultiplayerSynchronizer, player authority, lobbies and login, a dedicated or headless server export, lag, rubber-banding, prediction or netfox, cheating, bandwidth, Steam, Nakama or WebRTC. Symptoms: players do not appear on the client, 'rpc node checksum failed', 'node not found' on an RPC, desync, the server build is huge, a client never connects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an AI workflow against representative cases and its permitted actions. Use for model, retrieval or agent evaluation; tests do not grant release authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare and rehearse a recovery path for an intended release. Use when rollback is assumed, untested or previously failed; follow the environment authority for any drill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a failure, regression or incorrect result in an integration or application, even before it can be reproduced. Use for diagnosis and repair; follow incident authority for live mitigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retired July 28, 2026 (Legacy FedRAMP Ready). When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, draft documents containing factual claims, give legal advice or cite legal authority, discuss current events or public figures, provide technical or scientific information, state statistics or data points, or answer ANY question where the answer could have changed over time. Also trigger when the user asks Claude to 'check', 'verify', 'confirm', 'research', 'look up', or 'find out' anything, or when the user needs information that requires freshness, precision, or source accuracy. This skill overrides any default tendency to answer from memory. If a task involves stating facts, citing sources, or providing current information — use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footnotes are unspeakable as written, so a brief, opinion, statute, contract or memo needs them expanded, restructured or stripped before it can be listened to — and quoted authority is never rewritten. Use when converting written content for audio, preparing oral argument by ear, producing CLE or client-facing audio, or making a document listenable on a commute. Triggers on "make this listenable," "convert for audio," "optimize for reading aloud," "prepare for TTS," "make an audio version," "podcast script," "read this aloud." Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German and Portuguese; outputs plain text, ElevenLabs audio tags, or SSML for Amazon Polly, Google or Azure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches the domestic courts of 122 jurisdictions — 153 databases, 49 automated — for extradition and arrest-warrant surrender decisions, each in its own language and vocabulary. Answers the question no commercial database does: how are OTHER executing states treating this requesting state, or this ground? Searching by requesting state localises its name per jurisdiction (AE becomes 'Emiratele Arabe Unite' in Romania, 'Emirati Arabi Uniti' in Italy), so the sweep finds what those courts actually wrote. Every hit passes a relevance gate; every search leaves a dated report, so the research is reconstructable months later. Use when asked what foreign courts have said about surrender to a given state, whether any European court has refused extradition on prison conditions, assurances or Article 3, for comparative extradition research, or to build a foreign-authority section of an extradition argument. Not for domestic case law of the user's own jurisdiction, and never a substitute for reading the judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retires July 28, 2026. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

U.S. customs and trade-law research assistant for HTS classification, CROSS ruling research, CIT/CAFC decision briefing, duty compilation (General + Special + Chapter 99 + AD/CVD + MPF/HMF), country of origin determination, FTA qualification, and end-to-end import compliance review. Triggers on product classification, tariff questions, customs rulings, trade remedy screening (Section 301/232/201), Partner Government Agency admissibility, and UFLPA forced-labor analysis. Produces attorney-reviewable draft work product with an enforced HTSUS authority hierarchy and explicit evidence ledger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for sports games (FIFA, NBA 2K, Rocket League, Tony Hawk) covering physics-based ball interaction, team AI formations, contextual input, and match umpire/score authority. Broadcast framing routes to godot-camera-systems. Use when building soccer, basketball, hockey, racing sports, or arcade sports games. Keywords ball physics, magnus effect, formation AI, team tactics, contextual controls, steering behaviors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for adding multiplayer to single-player games including client-server architecture, authoritative server design, MultiplayerSynchronizer, lag compensation (client prediction, server reconciliation), input buffering, and anti-cheat measures. Use when retrofitting multiplayer, porting to online play, or designing networked gameplay. Trigger keywords: MultiplayerPeer, ENetMultiplayerPeer, SceneMultiplayer, MultiplayerSynchronizer, rpc, rpc_id, multiplayer_authority, client_prediction, server_reconciliation, lag_compensation, rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing multiplayer — MultiplayerAPI, ENet/WebSocket peers, RPCs, and authority model

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cialdini's seven principles of compliance (the classic six — reciprocation, commitment-consistency, social proof, liking, authority, scarcity — plus Unity, added 2016) and Pre-Suasion. Use when crafting ethical persuasion (marketing, sales, negotiation), defending against manipulation, or designing systems that need cooperation. Includes replication-crisis caveats and known factual corrections (Bickman parking-meter numbers, Hofling modern replication, Drive Carefully condition disambiguation, Genovese myth).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a domain's backlink profile using the SemRush API. Use when the user says "audit backlinks", "check my backlinks", "backlink analysis", "link profile", "toxic links", "disavow", "link building opportunities", "referring domains", "anchor text", or asks about a site's link authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。