Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Write integration tests for key workflows. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
976 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Write integration tests for key workflows. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Implement end-to-end testing. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Test across all major browsers. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add security scanning to CI/CD with Strix — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or any pipeline — so every pull request gets a diff-scoped AI pentest that blocks vulnerable code before it merges, with results as PR comments and SARIF uploaded to code scanning. Covers both the self-hosted open-source CLI (runs in your runner) and the managed app.strix.ai platform (GitHub/GitLab app or API, no runner infra). Use when the user asks to add security scanning, SAST/DAST, pentesting, vulnerability checks, or automated security review to their CI pipeline, pre-merge gate, or PR workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks, React/UI conventions, and tests. Review depth adapts to diff size and runtime subagent capability (single-agent or multi-agent reviewer-verifier). Report-only by default; code fixes and GitHub submission each require explicit invocation-time authorization (`fix` / `submit`). Normal-review prompts and safe interruption behavior follow the interaction contract below. To diagnose gaps in the skill after a review session, run `/gh-pr-review diag`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete automated literature discovery pipeline: multi-source search → six-dimension scoring → fine reading → formatted delivery → archival. Combines a configurable engine with daily cron-driven application layer. Works with Feishu, Telegram, or any messaging platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated cleanup of unused AWS resources to reduce costs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated end-to-end UI testing and verification on an Android Emulator using ADB.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer a website's internal API by recording browser traffic into a HAR file, then generate a standalone client or CLI that calls the endpoints directly, with no browser needed after the first recording. Use when asked to "derive a client", "build a CLI for <site>", "reverse engineer this site's API", "record network requests", "turn this site into an API", or when the same site will be automated repeatedly and direct HTTP calls would beat driving the browser every time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools for automated vulnerability detection in application code. Use when setting up security scanning, implementing DevSecOps practices, or automating code vulnerability detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master Bash Automated Testing System (Bats) for comprehensive shell script testing. Use when writing tests for shell scripts, CI/CD pipelines, or requiring test-driven development of shell utilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build automated billing systems for recurring payments, invoicing, subscription lifecycle, and dunning management. Use when implementing subscription billing, automating invoicing, or managing recurring payment systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement GitOps workflows with ArgoCD and Flux for automated, declarative Kubernetes deployments with continuous reconciliation. Use when implementing GitOps practices, automating Kubernetes deployments, or setting up declarative infrastructure management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance. Use when auditing websites for accessibility, fixing WCAG violations, or implementing accessible design patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create production-ready GitHub Actions workflows for automated testing, building, and deploying applications. Use when setting up CI/CD with GitHub Actions, automating development workflows, or creating reusable workflow templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build GitLab CI/CD pipelines with multi-stage workflows, caching, and distributed runners for scalable automation. Use when implementing GitLab CI/CD, optimizing pipeline performance, or setting up automated testing and deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Issue Planning and Automation prompt that generates comprehensive project plans with Epic > Feature > Story/Enabler > Test hierarchy, dependencies, priorities, and automated tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategy Development Manager: convert academic papers and research reports into validated factors and strategies with automated backtesting, persistent storage, and decay monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects typosquatting attacks in npm and PyPI package registries by analyzing package name similarity using Levenshtein distance and other string metrics, examining publish date heuristics to identify recently created packages mimicking established ones, and flagging download count anomalies where suspicious packages have disproportionately low usage compared to their legitimate targets. The analyst queries the PyPI JSON API and npm registry API to gather package metadata for automated comparison. Activates for requests involving package typosquatting detection, dependency confusion analysis, malicious package identification, or software supply chain threat hunting in package registries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。