「baseline」の検索結果

Creates integration test cases targeting Oracle for .NET data access artifacts. Tests capture Oracle expected behavior as the authoritative baseline; they are written once and later ported to PostgreSQL by migrating the test project in Phase 6. Use only during Phase 3, before any PostgreSQL migration work has begun. Do not invoke during Phase 6 or against a project that has already been migrated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect command injection against Modbus TCP/RTU in ICS/SCADA environments by monitoring unauthorized writes, anomalous function codes, malformed frames, and deviations from communication baselines using ICS-aware IDS and deep packet inspection. Use when deploying IDS for Modbus OT networks, investigating unauthorized PLC register/coil changes, or responding to FrostyGoop-style Modbus attacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Azure Storage accounts for public blob containers, missing encryption, overly permissive SAS tokens, disabled logging, and network access violations using Azure CLI, PowerShell, and Microsoft Defender for Storage. Use for storage security audits across subscriptions, responding to Defender for Storage anonymous-access alerts, verifying compliance controls, or setting security baselines when onboarding a subscription.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) using Elasticsearch/OpenSearch to build behavioral baselines, calculate anomaly scores, perform peer group analysis, and alert on insider threat indicators such as data exfiltration, privilege abuse, and unauthorized access. Use when building or tuning a UEBA pipeline rather than a one-off manual hunt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect anomalies in DNP3 communications used in SCADA/ICS systems by monitoring unauthorized control commands, firmware update attempts, protocol violations, and deviations from baseline traffic using deep packet inspection and machine learning approaches. Use when securing energy-sector or other OT/ICS networks, investigating suspicious DNP3 master/outstation activity, or building an anomaly-based IDS for industrial control traffic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects anomalous authentication patterns using UEBA analytics, statistical baselines, and machine learning models to identify impossible travel, credential stuffing, brute force, password spraying, and compromised account behaviors across authentication logs. Activates for requests involving authentication anomaly detection, login behavior analysis, UEBA implementation, or suspicious sign-in investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects insider data exfiltration by analyzing DLP policy violations, file access patterns, upload volume anomalies, and off-hours activity in endpoint and cloud logs. Uses pandas for behavioral analytics and statistical baselines. Use when investigating insider threats or building user behavior analytics for data loss prevention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys anomaly detection for OT/ICS environments using machine learning on OT network baselines, physics-based process models, and Modbus/DNP3/OPC UA traffic analysis to flag deviations, rogue devices, and mismatches against historian data. Use for continuous OT monitoring, baselining deterministic SCADA polling, or investigating alerts from Nozomi Guardian/Dragos needing deeper protocol analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect abnormal access in AWS S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage by analyzing CloudTrail Data Events, GCS audit logs, and Azure Storage Analytics for after-hours bulk downloads, new-IP access, and API-call spikes (e.g. GetObject) via statistical baselines and time-series anomaly detection. Use when investigating suspected cloud data exfiltration or building related detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse NetFlow v9 and IPFIX records to detect volumetric anomalies, port scanning, data exfiltration, and C2 beaconing patterns. Uses the Python netflow library to decode flow records, builds traffic baselines, and applies statistical analysis to identify flows with abnormal byte counts, connection durations, and periodic timing patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate an RxJS 7 application, library, or test suite to RxJS Next through an agent-led workflow that establishes a green behavioral baseline, makes Observable lifecycle choices explicit, uses @rxjs/migrate only for bounded fixture-proved rewrites, repairs without weakening evidence, and records a versioned migration contract. Use for repository assessment, migration planning or execution, lifecycle review, TestScheduler conversion, or migration closeout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end workflow for implementing a non-trivial qwen-code feature. Covers requirements investigation, design, E2E test planning, baseline dry-run, implementation, verification, self-audit, code review, and iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate pragmatic CI/CD pipelines from detected project stack signals — fast baseline generation, repeatable checks, environment-aware deployment stages. Use when setting up CI for a new project, refactoring existing pipelines, or standardizing deployment workflows across multiple repos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, optional plugin folders/files, and baseline placeholders you can edit before publishing or testing. Use when Codex needs to create a new local plugin, add optional plugin structure, or generate or update repo-root `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` entries for plugin ordering and availability metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retune a skill corpus for a new model, measurement-first: mine the run archive for a baseline, establish a noise floor, audit the corpus adversarially, then cut in measured passes until a pre-registered bar clears. Requires a benchmark harness that can A/B two builds of the corpus; refuses without one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys a baseline landing zone foundation for a Google Cloud Organization, establishing security guardrails using Organization Policies, resource hierarchy folders and projects, billing association, and centralized logging and monitoring. Deploys Google Cloud's recommended security controls and architecture. Use when setting up a new Google Cloud Organization or establishing a secure, enterprise-grade landing zone foundation. Don't use for individual project onboarding (use google-cloud-recipe-onboarding or product-specific skills instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hourly warehouse health sweep for {{warehouse_schema}}. Checks every monitored table's freshness against its SLA, compares row counts to the table's own trailing baseline, diffs the schema for drift, and checks for failed or stalled loads. Posts anomalies to {{alert_channel}} and drafts a GitHub issue in {{incident_repo}} with the likely cause. Read-only across the warehouse — never modifies data, tables, or pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects AI-generated writing four ways — a heuristic audit against a catalog of known AI patterns, deterministic statistical signals (n-gram entropy, burstiness, repetition, stylometry — features never verdicts), an empirical Pangram score calibrated against known-human baselines, and a keyless scan for watermark and steganography signatures (invisible characters, homoglyphs, bidi, odd whitespace) in the bytes. USE WHEN detect AI writing, is this AI, AI detection, AI detector, did an AI write this, does this sound like AI, AI writing score, pangram, scan for AI tells, flag AI patterns, AI-isms, statistical AI signals, burstiness, text entropy, is this watermarked, detect watermark, steganography, zero-width chars, hidden characters, invisible unicode, compare drafts for AI-ness. NOT FOR rewriting prose to strip AI patterns (use a voice/authoring skill), plagiarism detection, detecting AI-generated images/video/code, or judging whether writing is any good.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when building agent evaluation systems: deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, baseline comparison, and outcome measurement for agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Required reading whenever any chart_* tool is available. Teaches the one-tool embedding contract (call chart_render → live chart appears in chat AND a downloadable PNG lands in the queen session dir), the ECharts (data viz) vs Mermaid (structural diagrams) decision, the BI/financial-grade aesthetic baseline (no chartjunk, restrained palette, proper typography, single message per chart), and the canonical spec patterns for the 12 most-common chart types. Skipping this leads to 1990s-Excel charts, missing downloads, and the agent writing markdown image links by hand instead of letting chart_render drive the UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly delta tracking and progress reporting for GEO clients. Compares two GEO audits (baseline vs. current), calculates score improvements across all categories, tracks action item completion, and generates a "here's your progress" client report. Use when user says "compare", "delta", "monthly report", "progress", "confronta", "progressi", "report mensile", or when running a monthly client check-in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a recovered repro patch, assertions, and behavioral baseline before authoring or reviewing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the Omnigent CLI's setup/onboarding flow, terminal UI/UX, and critical user journeys in a completely isolated, reproducible loop. Drives the real `omnigent` binary through a PTY (pexpect) inside a throwaway OMNIGENT_CONFIG_HOME / OMNIGENT_DATA_DIR sandbox that never touches the user's real ~/.omnigent, captures ANSI-stripped frames for UX inspection, and proves a change is verifiable via a before→fix→after baseline diff. Load when developing or reviewing a CLI setup/onboarding/REPL/picker change (omnigent/cli.py, omnigent/onboarding/*, omnigent/repl/*, scripts/install_oss.sh), reproducing a cold-start/first-run UX bug, or confirming a fix actually lands. Several agents can run it concurrently on separate worktrees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。