「boundaries」の検索結果

Choose supported scope and compatibility boundaries for SDK behavior changes; revisit when feedback changes the design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design systems, services, and architectures. Trigger with "design a system for", "how should we architect", "system design for", "what's the right architecture for", or when the user needs help with API design, data modeling, or service boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in react. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in ember. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in alpine. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in svelte. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in preact. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in lit. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in angular. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in solid. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in octane. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and control Table v9 state in vue. Use for tracked reads, subscriptions, controlled slices, and framework-specific reactive boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug logging, Debug menu, runtime pitfalls, typing-latency-sensitive paths, SwiftUI list snapshot boundaries, OS-version repros, and local visual iteration for cmux. Use when adding debug probes, diagnosing UI/runtime issues, touching terminal rendering, tab/sidebar list views, drag/drop UTTypes, or using the Debug menu.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit and vulnerability scanner for AI agent skills before installation. Use when: (1) evaluating a skill from an untrusted source, (2) auditing a skill directory or git repo URL for malicious code, (3) pre-install security gate for Claude Code plugins, OpenClaw skills, or Codex skills, (4) scanning Python scripts for dangerous patterns like os.system, eval, subprocess, network exfiltration, (5) detecting prompt injection in SKILL.md files, (6) checking dependency supply chain risks, (7) verifying file system access stays within skill boundaries. Triggers: "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill for security", "check skill before install", "skill security check", "skill vulnerability scan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR against the Pascal architectural rules — package boundaries (core/viewer/editor/nodes), the registry-driven composition model (def.geometry / def.renderer / def.system), legacy-dispatch regressions, the slots + world-scale-UV convention for new nodes/geometry, hook hygiene (useEditor/useScene/useViewer), and selector performance. Use when the user asks to review a PR, audit a branch, or check that changes respect the codebase's architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Processes GCP infrastructure design and deployment workflows within Application Design Center (ADC). Use when: - Designing GCP infrastructure with Terraform. - Validating local HCL. - Performing best-practice plan scans. - Importing templates to Application Design Center (ADC). - Deploying templates. - Troubleshooting deployment failures. Boundaries: - Only use for GCP-specific cloud infrastructure. - Only use for Terraform coding within the ADC context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical reference for Kortix projects, Apps (sites, servers, backends with volumes) and internal business apps, the CLI, sessions, sandboxes, change requests, triggers, connectors, secrets, system skills, and the two session harnesses, pi and OpenCode. Covers `kortix.yaml` versions 1 and 2, serverless App deployments, harness configuration (`harnesses/pi/`, `harnesses/opencode/`), session identity, credential boundaries, and the complete pi and OpenCode references. Load when the user asks how Kortix works, what Kortix can do, how to deploy an App, how an agent discovers platform instructions, how to customize or configure this project's agents (create or fix an agent, subagent, skill, tool, plugin, extension, pi package, command, MCP server, model or permission rule; edit `opencode.jsonc`), how to edit `kortix.yaml`, how to use the `kortix` CLI, how to land work through a change request, or how to schedule and automate work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is unreliable across sessions — forgets context, drifts out of scope, claims "done" before tests pass, or starts each session inconsistently — or when creating or assessing AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, feature_list.json, init.sh, progress.md, or session-handoff files. Reach for it even if the user never says the word "harness."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the harness, scaffold, workflow, or optimizer itself is the optimization target: recursive self-improvement (RSI) loops, meta-harnesses, self-improving harnesses that mine their own failures and propose bounded edits, evolutionary or population-based search over agent scaffolds, acceptance gates for self-modifying systems, and agentic context evolution where the mechanism that produces context is versioned and evolved. Route governance of a single autonomous loop (locked surfaces, durable logs, rollback, novelty gates, approval boundaries) to harness-engineering, measurement and quality-gate design to evaluation, judge design to advanced-evaluation, and remote sandbox infrastructure to hosted-agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when designing autonomous agent harnesses: research loops, evaluation scaffolds, locked and editable surfaces, durable logs, novelty gates, pruning, rollback, PR preparation, and human approval boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sign a cloud provider's CLI in (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, or another) with a device-code flow, then run that CLI as the requesting user. Covers checking the CLI is installed, the login that survives the browser round-trip, and the boundaries on cloud writes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。