「choice」の検索結果

Compare options with weighted scoring, pros and cons, pre-mortems, opportunity costs, and ICE prioritization. Use when a user wants to reason through a choice, expose assumptions, or rank alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a visual house style. For multi-panel composition use `figure-composer`; for whole-paper ordering use `paper-narrative`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polishes academic English paragraph by paragraph, reviewing grammar, word choice, voice, coherence, and sentence structure. Outputs revision suggestions alongside polished text. Triggered by phrases like 'polish this paragraph,' 'check the grammar,' 'rewrite in academic English,' or keywords like manuscript editing, SCI polishing, and journal submission editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate academic referee reports for economics/finance papers, followed by a 150-word letter to the editor with recommendation (Reject / Major Revision) and Kai Wu signature. Two modes (normal / high-level), configurable number of comments; recommendation choice drives evaluation tone (Reject → negative, Major Revision → neutral). Trigger when user says "referee report" / "write referee report" / "审稿报告" / "写审稿意见" / "generate referee report" / "review this paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thoroughly verify all code, tables, figures, modeling decisions, and quantitative claims in an academic paper against its source R scripts and output files. Use this skill whenever you need to audit, replicate, or verify an academic research paper - including cross-checking LaTeX tables against R output, validating econometric modeling choices, ensuring sample sizes are consistent, building a verification manifest, and running automated replication tests. Trigger this skill for any mention of: paper verification, replication check, table audit, code-paper consistency, reproducing results, verifying estimates, checking coefficients, or any variant of "does the paper match the code."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records an architecture decision as a Nygard/MADR-shaped ADR under decisions/ — capturing the context that forced the choice, the options weighed, the decision itself, and its consequences in both directions, plus the supersedes chain that keeps a decision log honest. Read when asked to record an architecture decision, write an ADR, log the decision we made, document why we chose X over Y, capture this decision for the record, or supersede an old decision with a new one. Do NOT read to frame a proposal or explore an idea not yet decided (frame-a-proposal), to write a spec or implementation plan (write-a-spec), to write an incident postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or to judge whether a design is sound (review-a-design). This skill records a decision already made; it does not make one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope a feature end to end and write an implementation spec under specs/ from an accepted proposal — current-system mapping, goals/non-goals, a Decision Log for one-way-door choices, a live Open Questions backlog, and a real migration + test plan. Read when asked to write a spec, scope this feature, turn this proposal into a spec, plan the implementation, or break this into tasks. Do NOT fire on frame a proposal or write the PRD (sibling frame-a-proposal — a PRD frames a change before it is accepted; this skill starts once one is), record a decision or write the ADR (record-a-decision), write a postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or review this design (review-a-design) — those are separate skills. Complements the platform open-knowledge skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the agent to list all choices it made during the current work that it is not confident of. Manual-only; the user must ask for it by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fire the moment the user proposes a build. Instantly surface the 1-3 consequential choices hidden in their idea. Can also be invoked with /before-building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validation agent that validates plan tech choices against current best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for a PowerPoint presentation, a .pptx file, or slides for a talk/pitch/report — creating a new deck from scratch, editing an existing .pptx, or reading/summarizing an existing deck's content. Covers slide layout, color/typography choices, and a content-quality checklist for professional-looking output. Does not cover rendering slides to images for visual QA (see the 'Not supported' section).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review chart choice, labeling, accessibility, and storytelling quality for existing visualizations. Use as an explicit/manual helper for critique and cleanup, not as the main owner for scientific figure production or general chart generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized payload construction and weaponization analysis, including shellcode, file format payloads, phishing payloads, and staged or stageless payload choices. Use when a task belongs to the payload construction domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to analyze a creator, influencer, founder, or brand social account and understand positioning, content pillars, outlier posts, hooks, format choices, audience reaction, and what can be copied or tested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user describes a custom PAIDF Orchestration pipeline — a specific ordered combination of stages such as augmentation only, auto-labeling only, detection+captioning only, or image attribute augmentation without full auto-labeling — that no existing DAG in airflow/dags/workflows/ covers, and asks for a new Kubernetes DAG. Also use to check that a generated or existing DAG's model/container/prompt choices match an external spec document (e.g. a PAIDF `launchable.md`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Long-context MoE training guidance for Megatron Bridge. Covers CP sizing, selective recompute, dispatcher choices, and practical patterns from DSV3, Qwen3, and Qwen3-Next long-context experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick Jetson-compatible containers, vLLM runtime images, and Jetson AI Lab PyPI indexes; maps Orin SM 8.7 vs Thor SM 11.0 and JetPack-specific package choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for OpenFold3, NVIDIA's BioNeMo NIM microservice for biomolecular structure prediction. Invoke whenever the user mentions OpenFold3 or needs protein, protein-ligand, protein-DNA/RNA, or multi-chain complex prediction with the hosted NVIDIA API or local Docker NIM. Covers endpoint choice, auth, request payloads, output artifacts, confidence scores, and local container setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Evaluating a plugin, connector, or API for adoption: external connector readiness - assess whether a named plugin, connector, API, data provider, or multimodal route is safe, affordable, fresh, and observable; use executor-runtime-readiness for coding-owner choice and toolbelt-readiness for missing capability inventory. Use when the user says: external-connector-readiness, external connector readiness, connector readiness matrix, plugin readiness matrix, provider readiness, api readiness, connector adoption, external plugin adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Choosing between coding agents on evidence: compare executor or agent choices on reproducible tasks using quality, cost, time, tool, and evidence metrics. Use when the user says: agent-evaluation, agent evaluation, agent eval, agent benchmark, executor evaluation, executor benchmark, compare agents, compare codex claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turning a described need (several constraints, a gift, a choice between candidates already in view, a search that came back empty or sold out) into a shortlist and a pick. Not needed when one search for the thing the customer named answers the request, or when the customer wants to learn what matters in a category first (purchase-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High-contrast, expressive style with creative typography and bold color choices for visually striking interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an MVP technical design from agreed requirements, including architecture choices and relevant tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。