「code review loop」の検索結果

Generate a polished frontend reference screenshot through a configurable GPT-image-2-compatible generations endpoint, save and show versioned previews inside the project, revise selected previews through a configurable /images/edits endpoint, and reproduce only the user-approved design as functional frontend code with high visual fidelity. Use when Codex is asked to design, build, restyle, or recreate a web page, application screen, dashboard, landing page, or UI component through an image-first workflow, design approval loop, screenshot-driven implementation, pixel matching, or a 1:1 frontend recreation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial triage of open review findings on a PR. Every finding (Codex, Claude bot, Gemini) is a hostile hypothesis to REFUTE — fix only what is proven real, reachable, in the PR's scope, and above the round's severity bar. The bar rises every review round. Everything else is declined or filed as an issue. Use for 'fix the PR findings', '/fix', '/fix 123', or before any fix commit in a review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spring Bootの変更をビルド、コード解析、テスト、セキュリティ検査で確認するスキル。差分もレビューし、公開・デプロイ前の合否と修正点をまとめます。

• Spring BootのPR前に確認したいとき
• リファクタリングや依存更新後の検証
• テストカバレッジの目標を確認したいとき

Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with render_game_to_text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a generated paper via Gemini review through gemini-review MCP → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a generated paper via Claude review through claude-review MCP → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the smallest possible code change that fixes a specific, well-scoped issue (CI failure, reviewer comment, typo). Use only when the fix target is explicit. Never refactor unrelated code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate candidate fixes for verified security findings. Consumes TRIAGE.json (preferred), VULN-FINDINGS.json, INCIDENTS.json, or a vuln-pipeline results directory. Pipeline input is delegated to the execution-verified `vuln-pipeline patch` ladder; static-analysis input gets a per-finding patch subagent + independent reviewer and is written as inert diffs for human review. Writes PATCHES/bug_NN/{patch.diff,patch_result.json}, PATCHES.md, and PATCHES.json. Use when asked to "fix the findings", "patch these vulns", "generate fixes", or "close the loop on triage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor a PR's CI checks and Greptile code review after submission. Polls CI status, auto-fixes failures via ralph-loop, waits for Greptile review, addresses comments, and iterates until green.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a shipped app that works but feels rough to a product that fits the job, flows without friction, reads clearly, and persuades honestly. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - jobs-to-be-done, ux-heuristics, design-everyday-things, refactoring-ui, microinteractions, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, high-perf-browser, steve-jobs-design-review - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (CUSTOMER.md, DESIGN.md, POSITIONING.md, IMPROVE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a clunky product, cut UX friction, sharpen in-app copy, or says 'the app works but feels rough'. Not for code, tests, or hardening - use improve-code-quality (fresh prototype) or remove-technical-debt (aged); no app yet, create-app; needs growth loops, grow-app; marketing-site friction, improve-website; one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, build and quality-check a premium short commercial for a real business (roofing, property, ecommerce, B2B software) using AI-generated footage, code-built motion (HTML/GSAP), selective Three.js and an independent-critic "Gauntlet" loop. Use when asked to make a launch-style / SaaS-style video, business ad, explainer, sample reel or pitch video, or to review and improve one. Encodes motion principles distilled from 28 professional launch films, a quality bar, audio rules and a business-offer playbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up how you and your team build and work with AI agents, and produces an Agent Workflow Charter (agent lanes, plan-mode loop, autonomy ladder with promotion criteria, rules file, review policy, security rules, rollout plan). Use when you ask 'how should we work with Claude Code / Codex / Cursor', 'how many agents should I run', 'should the agent be autonomous', 'plan mode', 'CLAUDE.md', 'AI-native team', 'roll out AI to my team', or 'my agent keeps screwing up'. Draws on 110 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Claire Vo, Boris Cherny and Aishwarya Naresh Reganti.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a change without the deep review loop: stage, simplify code and docs, run the project's checks, smoke test, update the changelog, self-improve, and ship. Use when the user asks to "quick finalize", "quickly finalize", "finalize quickly", "light finalize", "wrap this up quickly", "close this out without the full review", or "ship this without the deep pass".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial review and fix loop for code, specs, plans, and migration manifests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks anything about Adobe After Effects — to "write an After Effects expression", "make a wiggle / loopOut / inertial bounce", "rig a control with a slider / null", "build a MOGRT / Essential Graphics template", "export AE to Lottie or Media Encoder"; OR to "export from After Effects", "export with transparency / an alpha channel", "fix a black background on export", "choose ProRes vs H.264", "which codec / what bitrate for 1080p / 4K", "stop H.264 disappearing from the Render Queue"; OR when "After Effects is slow / laggy / crashing / froze", "RAM preview won't play in real time", "AE is using all my memory / render takes forever", "how do I speed up After Effects"; OR to "organize my After Effects project", "relink missing footage", "fix broken links after moving files", "set a folder structure / naming conventions", "batch rename layers", or "write an ExtendScript / .jsx script". Covers expressions & rigging, export recipes, performance triage, and project hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when optimizing, auditing, or preparing to ship web animations or rendering performance work: frame loops, scroll/viewport reveals, mount/unmount transitions, canvas/WebGL lifecycles, reduced motion, lazy rendering, and deferred off-screen work. Use for jank, per-frame allocations, forced reflows, render loops, animations that do not pause off-screen, content-visibility, requestIdleCallback, analyzing Chrome DevTools performance traces for animation or rendering issues, or choosing between browser-driven CSS/WAAPI, minimal JS, phase, and Motion/GSAP. Use when the user explicitly asks about phase APIs or behavior. Do not use during exploratory animation ideation, prototyping, visual iteration, or trying variants, even when the code already imports phase; wait until the user asks for performance guidance, an audit, production implementation, ship-readiness review, or about phase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches a saved multi-agent workflow by id on Claude Code or Codex. Use when the user asks to run a saved workflow or review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified verification engine for Python data science projects. Covers environment checks, type checking, linting, tests, security scans, code review with DS anti-patterns, and notebook checks. Commands (/verify, /quality-gate) invoke different subsets of this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap self-improving Symphony + Linear orchestration for a software repository. Use when Codex needs to inspect a repo, review or generate repo-local guidance, shape Linear issues, render a Symphony workflow, launch a high-leverage first execution wave, or run an orchestrator-led review, recovery, and learnings loop that makes future runs better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack developer-experience plan review for setup, local commands, docs, test loops, onboarding friction, and maintainability before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep security audit for WordPress plugin/theme PHP code, covering issues beyond the basic sanitize/escape/nonce checklist — PHP object injection (unserialize), SSRF in remote requests, CSRF on state-changing GET handlers, mass assignment via $_POST loops, insecure file include / template injection, mail header injection, ZipSlip in archive extraction, type-juggling in auth comparisons, and TOCTOU race patterns in option/meta locks. Use after or alongside wp-security-audit when reviewing complex plugins, REST APIs, integrations that fetch remote URLs, file processors, or any code that handles uploads, archives, or self-rolled auth tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。