「compare」の検索結果

Time-travel debugging for DAG executions. Inspect agent state at any node, replay decisions with modified inputs, compare execution traces side-by-side, and identify where reasoning diverged. Inspired by LangGraph Studio's state-editing model and Temporal's event history. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "time travel debug", "inspect node state", "what went wrong at step", "compare runs", "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate beautiful, on-brand HTML artifacts — reports, diagrams, diff reviews, slide decks, plans, recaps, dashboards. Loads on creation intents ("create a plan", "make me an implementation plan", "generate a diagram", "build a slide deck", "draft a recap", "visualize this", "render this as HTML", "make me a status update") and exploration intents ("show me three layouts", "explore document shapes", "compare visual treatments", "explore a new design system", "compare replacement brand directions") and iteration intents ("make this beautiful", "polish this report", "make this less generic", "design this", "theme this", "use my brand", "iterate on this design", "review this artifact", "make this bolder", "make this quieter", "simplify this design", "animate this", "improve the look of", "give this a refresh"). Captures brand from the user's codebase, asking, or live site, then applies it to every artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose a comparison newsletter from Ahmad's OpenMark saves — A vs B vs C, side-by-side, table-driven. Use when Ahmad wants to compare tools, models, frameworks, approaches, or platforms across his saves. Trigger phrases include "compare", "X vs Y", "head to head", "which should I use", "differences between", "trade-offs between", "/newsletter-comparison". Output centers a markdown table with consistent columns, supports it with short prose blocks, ends with a clear recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a release test-impact analysis for a Tamanu version upgrade: compare two Tamanu releases and classify every functional area as Full Test, Smoke Test, or Skip, each with a short reason and the Linear card or PR reference. Use when the user wants a test plan, QA scope, regression scope, or "what to test" for a Tamanu release or upgrade, wants to compare or diff two Tamanu versions (e.g. v2.57 to v2.59), or asks which areas changed between two releases. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.Y branches vs vX.Y.Z tags) and maps changed files and PRs to Tamanu functional sections (Patient Management, Encounters/Charting, Surveys & Programs, Medications, Labs, Imaging, Appointments, Vaccinations, Sync, Settings, Reports, Admin/Permissions, Mobile, etc.). Optionally maps against a regression-testing spreadsheet's sections when one is provided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze pi (coding-agent) session JSONL and ego-benchmark-harness run artifacts to explain slow or failed individual tasks, compare execution-path differences between agents or browser tools, and count tool calls and error types. Use this skill whenever users ask to analyze a pi session, explain why a task was slow or failed, compare two runs, investigate an error, locate the session corresponding to tasks.jsonl, inspect an agent execution path, count tool calls, analyze a run ID, or perform any forensic or retrospective analysis of JSONL under ~/.pi/agent/sessions/ or agent-home/.pi/agent/sessions/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages your own skill landscape: surveys and compares existing skills (Audit mode), researches the web for new skills/plugins (Explore mode), and is at the same time the installer that generates lean subskills (Skill-Finder, family umbrella, maintenance skills) instead of loading a monolith. Use this skill for "compare/audit skills", "which skills are duplicated", "form skill families", "clean up/consolidate skills", "maintain the skill register", "find skills/plugins for topic X", "install new skills", "browse the skill marketplace", or for `/skill-explorer`. Delivers a sub-report per family and a globally numbered decision list; installs/uninstalls only after a security check and explicit approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares one policy against one requirement set (standard, regulation, contract schedule or customer requirement) clause by clause and returns a draft gap review: each requirement element, the policy clause that appears to address it, an apparent match state, and every gap as a question with the clause reference on both sides. Never concludes that the policy complies; the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "gap our policy against the standard", "map this policy to the regulation clause by clause", "check the security policy against the customer's contract schedule", "compare our policy with the new edition" or "where does our policy fall short of the requirements". Do not use for mapping a requirement to the operating controls that implement it, use controls-gap-pack instead; for what a regulatory change means for the organisation, use regulatory-change-impact-note. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares one clause (liability, termination, confidentiality or any other) across several contracts, templates or successive versions and returns a DRAFT comparison table: verbatim clause text per document, the clause split into elements with every difference from the baseline highlighted and categorised, and neutral questions for counsel. Never says which wording is better or enforceable. Use when the user asks to "compare the liability caps across these five supplier contracts", "line up the termination clause in these three drafts", "show how the confidentiality clause changed between versions", "contrast this clause with our template" or "benchmark the indemnity wording across our customer agreements". Do not use for a whole-contract review, use contract-review-pack instead; for screening one NDA against standard positions, use nda-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares a changed HR policy with the version it replaces and drafts a clause-by-clause change log, a plain-language DRAFT employee briefing, a manager FAQ answered only from the policy text with clause references, and a list of open questions the people team must settle before release. Use when the user asks to explain, announce, summarise or brief a policy change, a new policy version or an updated handbook section, or says "what changed in the leave policy", "brief managers on the new handbook section" or "compare the old and new versions of this policy". Do not use for a single announcement with no version comparison, use announcement-drafter instead; for an FAQ from documents that are not a policy change, use faq-builder; for contract clauses, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table with clause references, compares each term against the user's playbook of standard positions, and returns a DRAFT contract review pack: deviations and issues, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to "review this contract", "abstract the key terms", "summarise this MSA", "pressure-test this SOW against our playbook" or to compare an agreement with their standard positions. Do not use for a first pass on a stand-alone NDA, use nda-triage instead, or for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two MIKE+ runs via the mike-plus MCP server — baseline vs scenario, before vs after a parameter edit — to say WHERE a change mattered and BY HOW MUCH (delta peak, delta volume, timing shift, RMSE/NSE) and to draw the overlay hydrograph. Use whenever two .res1d files of the same model exist or a re-run just finished. Comparing needs no license; producing the second run does.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record provenance for an Agentic MIKE+ step via the mike-plus MCP server — a manifest.json tying the model copy, inputs, edits, run QA status, result files and figures together, each file with a sha256. Use at the end of every run/compare/plot task (successful or failed) so the work can be audited, re-compared or reproduced later. No license required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility skill for geo compare. Use when a user or upstream workflow invokes this name; route the task to `ai-seo` while preserving the requested scope and source-specific intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about finding the best, top, or recommended model for a task, wants to know what AI model to use, or wants to compare models by benchmark scores. Triggers on: "best model for X", "what model should I use for", "top models for [task]", "which model runs on my laptop/machine/device", "recommend a model for", "what LLM should I use for", "compare models for", "what's state of the art for", or any question about choosing an AI model for a specific use case. Always use this skill when the user wants model recommendations or comparisons, even if they don't explicitly mention HuggingFace or benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

レッドストーンコンパレーターの向き(facing)、mode(compare/subtract)、connects配置の仕様。comparator使用時に必ず読む。

UIの視覚的差分を検出・比較する。デザイン変更前後の比較、リファレンスとの差分確認時に使用。「デザイン比較」「UI差分」「design diff」「design compare」「ビフォーアフター」「見た目の違い」などのキーワードで自動適用。

Curate Busabase training examples, create immutable dataset snapshots, run reproducible LoRA or QLoRA fine-tunes on a local Apple Silicon Mac with MLX-LM, compare the untouched baseline and adapter on locked evaluations, and register approved adapters. Use when the user wants to train, fine-tune, evaluate, compare, promote, or manage a local language model with Busabase as the workflow source of truth. Do not use for RAG-only knowledge retrieval, cloud training, or training a foundation model from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after changing prompts, skills, the compiler, or editorial policies — or when the user asks to measure edit quality, run regression evals, check agreement with approved edits, or says '評価して', '一致率を測って', 'eval を回して'. Compares agent output against human-approved golden projects.

Compares Hi-C contact maps between conditions across the right scale -- differential bin-pair contacts (multiHiCcompare, diffHic), differential A/B compartments (dcHiC), differential TAD boundaries (delta insulation), and differential loops (diffloop, DiffHiChIP) -- with distance-stratified between-sample normalization, replicate-aware NB-GLM FDR, HiCRep SCC reproducibility gating, and CNV correction for cancer/aneuploid samples. Use when comparing Hi-C between treatment and control, finding differential contacts/compartments/boundaries/loops, normalizing two maps of unequal depth, choosing a replicate-aware test, gating replicates with SCC, or correcting copy-number artifacts before a tumor-vs-normal comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates, normalizes, and converts bedGraph signal tracks (4-column chrom/start/end/value, 0-based half-open) with bedtools genomecov, deepTools bamCoverage/bamCompare/bigwigCompare, bedtools unionbedg, and UCSC bedGraphToBigWig. Covers why a raw coverage bedGraph is not comparable across samples until normalized, the CPM/RPKM/BPM/RPGC normalization menu and the conserved-total assumption that makes them wrong under a global perturbation, the strict sorted-non-overlapping-chrom.sizes bedGraphToBigWig contract that silently corrupts a bigWig, effective-genome-size selection, and bin-size aliasing. Use when building or normalizing a coverage/signal track from a BAM, comparing tracks across samples or conditions, converting bedGraph to a browser-ready bigWig, or diagnosing a track that looks plausible but reports wrong heights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract, SES), k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side competitive comparison of two or more companies. Use when user says "compare", "X vs Y", "which is better", or asks about competitive dynamics between specific companies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。