「comparisons」の検索結果

Research public companies and listed securities with current market, company, ownership, and filing data through SandBase. Use for ticker analysis, price-performance comparisons, insider activity, or an evidence-backed investment research brief; do not use for trade execution or personalized financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and write evidence-backed listicles, product roundups, and best-of comparisons with optional SandBase SERP, page, review, and screenshot evidence. Use for ‘best tools’, ‘top products’, roundup, SEO, GEO, or answer-engine content; do not use for an unresearched promotional ranking presented as independent advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build circular genome visualizations using circlize (R), pyCirclize (Python), or Circos (Perl CLI) with ideogram tracks, multi-data tracks (scatter, histogram, heatmap), chord/link arcs for interactions, and explicit circos.clear() between plots. Covers when circular is appropriate vs when Cartesian wins (Cleveland-McGill 1984), karyograms, and chromosome adjacency in chord diagrams. Use when adjacency on the circle conveys meaning — chromosome-level overview, structural variants, Hi-C interactions, cross-genome comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract market, financial, earnings, industry, and company metrics with Firecrawl. Use when the user asks for market research, industry trends, public company data, financial comparisons, earnings research, or structured market reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CesiumJS imagery layers - ImageryProvider, ImageryLayer, ImageryLayerCollection, WMS, WMTS, Bing, OpenStreetMap, ArcGIS, Mapbox, tile discard policies. Use when adding or swapping base map layers, configuring imagery providers, layering multiple map sources, or creating split-screen imagery comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract market, financial, earnings, industry, and company metrics with Firecrawl. Use when the user asks for market research, industry trends, public company data, financial comparisons, earnings research, or structured market reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or analysing an A/B test, computing power or sample size, testing whether a difference is real, or writing any statistical claim — effect sizes with intervals, SRM checks, multiple comparisons and causal caveats

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry scans. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, or tech scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive competitor analysis, competitive intelligence, and comparison page creation. Use when analyzing competitive landscape, creating competitor comparison pages (alternative pages, vs pages, competitor A vs B pages), performing market research, building SWOT analysis, creating feature matrices, pricing comparisons, competitor teardowns, battle cards, or positioning maps. Covers research workflows, SEO-optimized comparison content, data-grounded reports with citations, 7-layer analysis framework, review mining, and sales enablement. Triggers include competitor analysis, competitive analysis, competitor teardown, vs page, alternative page, competitor comparison, market research, competitive intelligence, SWOT analysis, battle card, competitor pricing, market landscape, feature comparison, positioning map.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-driven web and open-source research for questions that require multiple sources, factual verification, comparisons, or an adopt/adapt/build decision. Use for substantial research in foreground sessions, the genesis-researcher subagent, and research-profile background sessions. Skip for a single stable fact or a known URL that only needs fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and consult this skill whenever your response would include specific facts about Anthropic's products. Covers: Claude Code (how to install, Node.js requirements, platform/OS support, MCP server integration, configuration), Claude API (function calling/tool use, batch processing, SDK usage, rate limits, pricing, models, streaming), and Claude.ai (Pro vs Team vs Enterprise plans, feature limits). Trigger this even for coding tasks that use the Anthropic SDK, content creation mentioning Claude capabilities or pricing, or LLM provider comparisons. Any time you would otherwise rely on memory for Anthropic product details, verify here instead — your training data may be outdated or wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests whether data supports a claim: A/B significance, peeking, sample size, eval error bars, multiple comparisons. Use when deciding if results are significant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds repeatable deep-research workflows for verified synthesis. Use when producing evidence-backed briefs, comparisons, dossiers, or research pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Nexscope (Search Intelligence Framework) data to analyze ASIN traffic source composition and exposure distribution, covering current period/previous period/newly entered/exited period comparisons. Trigger when the user mentions ASIN traffic sources, traffic structure analysis, organic traffic vs paid traffic share, exposure score breakdown, period comparison, new/exited traffic keywords, competitor traffic analysis, SP ad keyword count, brand ad exposure, Amazon's Choice exposure, editorial recommendation exposure, Top Rated exposure, video ad exposure, organic search exposure ratio, PPC traffic sources, promotional deal traffic sources, recommendation slot structure breakdown, ASIN traffic analysis, traffic sources, organic traffic share, ad traffic share, exposure analysis, traffic structure, period-over-period comparison, keyword churn, Nexscope. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope", if their need involves analyzing an ASIN's traffic sources, exposure channel distribution, cross-period comparison, or competitor traffic structure comparison, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO-friendly article writing, audit, and humanization workflow for Markdown content. Use when creating, outlining, editing, auditing, rewriting, or quality-checking blog posts, tutorials, comparisons, listicles, explainers, FAQ sections, excerpts, SEO titles, meta descriptions, tags, or Google-friendly content briefs that need clear topics, natural keyword use, on-page SEO review, reader-friendly prose, and iterative optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Medium-native long-form research, author-assistance, writing, editing, review, topic discovery, publication matching, and packaging workflow. Use when creating, outlining, researching, revising, auditing, or packaging Medium stories, essays, tutorials, reviews, explainers, comparisons, case studies, publication submissions, Medium 长文, Medium 选题, Medium Topics, or Medium publishing packs that need original author perspective, narrative craft, relevant topics, responsible AI disclosure, and reader-centered distribution readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Belegte, objektive Wettbewerbsvergleiche und Alternativseiten für den deutschen und DACH-Markt erstellen. Nutze diesen Skill für Seiten der Form „X-Alternative“, „X-Alternativen“, „Produkt vs. X“ oder „A vs. B“, für interne Competitive-Unterlagen und Battlecards, und wenn ein vorhandener Vergleich auf Symmetrie und Belege geprüft werden soll. Führt ein Aussagen- und Quellenverzeichnis, hält Preisangaben mit Stichtag fest, prüft § 6 UWG und Markenrecht konservativ und benennt bestätigte Trade-offs statt einseitiger Vorteile. Für das Profil eines einzelnen Anbieters ohne Vergleichsseite: competitor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for emerging market insurance stocks. P/B 0.5-1.0x with 30-50% EM discount, combined ratio targets, and China vs India market comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

US Insurance Specialist for life, disability, long-term care, and annuity planning. Conducts needs analysis, compares policy types (term, whole life, universal, variable), explains underwriting classes, recommends benefit amounts and riders, analyzes disability income protection (own occupation vs any occupation), evaluates long-term care costs and hybrid policies, and structures annuities (immediate, deferred, fixed, variable) for retirement income. Use for insurance needs calculations, policy comparisons, or state insurance regulation compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。