「ctf」の検索結果

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for live container runtime analysis, mounted secrets, sidecars, namespaces, init containers, entrypoint drift, and route-to-container resolution. Use when the user asks why a live container differs from manifests, where a mounted secret is consumed, how a sidecar or init container changes runtime state, or which route resolves to which live container. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF challenge ana orkestratörü — kategori tespiti, modern saldırı patern tanıma, ilgili skill arama, cross-skill zincir koordinasyonu, hızlı referans erişim. Auto-solver ve hint-system routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF competition assistant helping participants solve security challenges. Challenge analysis, vulnerability identification, exploitation technique suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web+AI 安全测试知识库。融合 WooYun 88,636 案例 + 先知 L1-L4 方法论 + GAARM 150 风险 + OWASP Top 10 (LLM/ASI/WSTG)。 TRIGGER when 任务是实战安全测试：渗透测试、漏洞挖掘/利用、红队攻防、安全审计 (SAST/DAST)、 CTF、AI/LLM 安全测试 (Prompt 注入/越狱/MCP/Agent/沙箱逃逸)。用户明确给出测试目标 (URL/代码/模型/Agent 架构) 且意图是"测试/审计/挖漏洞/利用"。 DO NOT trigger: - 安全概念讨论（"什么是 XSS"、"SQL 注入原理是什么"）→ 普通问答 - 非安全性质的 code review / debug / 性能优化 → code-audit-skill 或其他 - 修复语法错误 / 业务逻辑 bug → 普通编程协助 - 纯 Web 白盒代码审计（完整项目目录 / Source-Sink 污点分析）→ code-audit-skill - 仅引用 CVE 编号查文档 → WebSearch 边界细则: CTF 短代码片段 + 利用思路 → 本 Skill；完整项目目录 + 系统白盒审计 → code-audit-skill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF密码学攻击知识库 — RSA攻击（小指数/共模/Wiener/Coppersmith）、AES攻击（Padding Oracle/ECB字节翻转/GCM nonce重用）、ECC攻击、LFSR/LCG/PRNG攻击、古典密码、LWE格攻击

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF Web攻击知识库 — PHP弱比较绕过、命令注入空格绕过、eval回显技巧、SSTI注入链、反序列化利用链、PHP代码审计checklist、常见flag位置

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot-to-root methodology for a full machine (THM/HTB/PG/CTF box, "get user.txt+root.txt", "root the box", "foothold to root"). Enforces basic-tool recon (nmap, nc, ffuf, nuclei, dig) before anything custom, wiki-first lookups, and ALWAYS pspy + linpeas/winpeas for privesc. Use when handed a box/IP to own end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF challenge router - fingerprint a challenge (file type / prompt / artifacts) into its category (pwn, rev, crypto, forensics, stego, web, osint, hash) and route to the matching wiki page, tools, and first moves. Wiki-first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

安全研究元思考方法论 - 从先知社区5600+篇安全文档中提炼的漏洞挖掘方法论框架。 Use this skill when: - 进行漏洞挖掘和安全研究时，需要系统化的思考框架 - 分析特定类型漏洞（Web注入、反序列化、二进制、域渗透等）的攻击路径 - 需要了解绕过防护措施（WAF、EDR、沙箱）的思维模式 - 进行代码审计需要Source-Sink分析方法论 - 红队攻防需要完整攻击链规划 - CTF竞赛需要快速解题思路 - 逆向分析恶意软件需要方法论指导 Triggers: 漏洞挖掘、安全研究、渗透测试、代码审计、红队攻防、CTF、逆向分析、 WAF绕过、免杀、提权、横向移动、域渗透、反序列化、二进制安全、Fuzzing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Flow (@xyflow/react) for workflow visualization with custom nodes and edges. Use when building graph visualizations, creating custom workflow nodes, implementing edge labels, or controlling viewport. Triggers on ReactFlow, @xyflow/react, Handle, NodeProps, EdgeProps, useReactFlow, fitView.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when effectful, security-sensitive code needs refinement-typed, SMT-backed verification in F*, in the HACL* or Project Everest style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SQL injection — error-based, blind boolean, time-based ve UNION tekniklerini kapsar; CTF'te login bypass, veri çekme ve flag okumak için tam otomatik exploit şablonları içerir

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Z3 SMT solver ile CTF constraint çözme — byte equations, hash collision, validator bypass

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture The Flag challenge solving — reverse engineering, steganography, forensics, crypto, web exploitation, binary exploitation, OSINT. Pattern recipes for fast triage and direct exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF challenge otomatik cozum pipeline'i. 6 asama: zip'i ac, siniflandir, coz, flag topla, writeup olustur. /auto-solve komutuyla cagrilir.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Flow (ノードベース UI / フロー図ライブラリ for React) リファレンス。 ReactFlow コンポーネント、Node, Edge, Handle, Viewport、 カスタムノード / エッジ、Controls / MiniMap / Background、 レイアウトアルゴリズム (dagre, elkjs)、ドラッグ&ドロップ、エッジ接続。

Use the reverse-skill repository from Codex for authorized reverse engineering, security analysis, CTF, and defensive testing tasks. Requires the reverse-skill repository to be available as the current workspace or an explicitly supplied local path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从逆向走到可用利用 (Working Exploit) 的全链路工程化方法。 适用场景：拿到了二进制 + 漏洞点 + 目标环境，需要写出一个能稳定打通的 exploit（不是只能本地复现一下、远程一打就崩的脚本）。 覆盖三大方向：栈溢出 / 堆利用 / 内核 pwn。强调"CTF 本地通 → 真实远程稳定打通"的工程差距：libc 版本错配、堆喷射时序、SMEP/SMAP/KASLR、栈对齐、远程缓冲。 核心工具链：pwntools + GEF/pwndbg + ROPgadget/Ropper + one_gadget + libc-database + qemu-system 内核调试。 触发关键词：pwn、栈溢出、堆溢出、ROP、ret2libc、ret2csu、one_gadget、libc-database、堆利用、tcache、fastbin、unsorted bin、kernel pwn、kROP、SMEP、SMAP、KASLR、modprobe_path、pwntools、GEF、pwndbg。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates task-oriented technical documentation with progressive disclosure. Use when writing READMEs, API docs, architecture docs, or markdown documentation. Also use this skill at the END of any completed reverse engineering, penetration testing, CTF, or security analysis task to generate a formal report in the user's project directory. Trigger keywords: 写报告, 写文档, 出报告, writeup, 技术文档, report, documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use this skill when analyzing malware evasion techniques, when implementing anti-debugging protections for CTF challenges, when reverse engineering packed binaries, or when building security research tools that need to detect virtualized environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Linux privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a low-privilege shell to root: SUID/SGID binary abuse via GTFOBins, Linux capabilities exploitation (cap_setuid, cap_dac_override, cap_dac_read_search), sudo misconfigurations including NOPASSWD rules and Baron Samedit (CVE-2021-3156), cron job abuse through writable scripts, PATH hijacking, and wildcard injection with tar/rsync/chown. Includes writable /etc/passwd attacks, NFS no_root_squash exploitation, kernel exploits (DirtyPipe CVE-2022-0847, DirtyCow CVE-2016-5195, PwnKit CVE-2021-4034), Docker group container escapes, LD_PRELOAD and LD_LIBRARY_PATH hijacking for shared library injection, systemd service misconfigurations, and sensitive file enumeration for credential harvesting. Integrates automated enumeration with LinPEAS, linux-exploit-suggester, pspy for process monitoring, and GTFOBins for binary exploitation. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-side visibility to support purple team operations. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1548 (Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism) and related sub-techniques. Designed for authorized penetration testing, red team engagements, and CTF competitions where you hold a low-privilege shell and need to escalate to root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Windows privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a standard user shell to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM: token impersonation via SeImpersonate and SeAssignPrimaryToken privileges using JuicyPotato, PrintSpoofer, GodPotato, SweetPotato, and RoguePotato; service misconfigurations including unquoted service paths, weak service DACLs, writable service binaries, and insecure service creation permissions; AlwaysInstallElevated MSI exploitation; DLL hijacking through search order abuse, phantom DLL loading, and writable PATH directory injection; UAC bypass techniques via fodhelper.exe, eventvwr.exe, CMSTP, and environment variable manipulation; scheduled task abuse for writable task actions and new task creation; registry autorun exploitation for persistence and escalation; PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527) for remote and local privilege escalation; and credential harvesting from SAM database extraction, DPAPI blob decryption, LSA secret dumping, and Credential Manager enumeration. Integrates automated enumeration with WinPEAS, PowerUp, SharpUp, Seatbelt, and BeRoot. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-side visibility for purple team operations. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1548 (Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism) and T1574 (Hijack Execution Flow). Designed for authorized penetration testing, red team engagements, and CTF competitions where you hold a standard user shell and need to escalate to SYSTEM or local Administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before any projectflow call or Team Leader workflow involving Project state, Project lifecycle, DAG planning, Loop planning, ready node checks, pause/resume/complete, project recovery, heartbeat project checks, or project-level result aggregation. Always use team-coordination first when the question is how to organize the work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。