「egress」の検索結果

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement visual regression testing with Playwright screenshots, Chromatic, Percy, and Argos CI. Covers baseline management, diff threshold tuning, dynamic content masking, responsive viewport testing, and review/approval workflows. Use when: "visual test," "screenshot," "visual regression," "pixel diff," "snapshot diff," "update baselines," "Chromatic," "percy snapshot," "argos screenshot." Not for: bulk baseline regeneration after a redesign broke many tests — use selector-drift-recovery; cross-browser rendering matrices — use cross-browser-testing; general Playwright test structure — use playwright-automation. Related: playwright-automation, ci-cd-integration, cross-browser-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent and LLM evaluations in CI/CD pipelines — automated quality gates that fail the build when AI output quality drops. Use when someone asks to "test my AI agent", "add evals to CI", "catch prompt regressions", "compare models", "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up AI quality gates", or "benchmark my agent before deploying". Covers eval frameworks (Cobalt, Promptfoo, Braintrust), LLM-as-judge scoring, threshold-based assertions, and GitHub Actions integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a long swarm of hundreds to thousands of cheap headless coding workers that drive a large failing-test backlog to green. Failures are clustered by signature, each worker fixes one cluster in its own git worktree, a serial no-regression merge gate lands the fixes, the loop resumes across restarts for hours, and it federates across sibling sessions over git branches when one container's CPU is not enough. Use for "fix these thousands of failing tests with a Haiku swarm", "drive the test suite to green with hundreds of agents", "build this compiler or interpreter against a conformance suite", "launch, relaunch or check in on the swarm loop", "the swarm is stuck, idle or rejecting everything", "parallel agents fixing tests keep hitting merge conflicts and regressions", "add sibling containers to the swarm", or "compare models on the tail the swarm could not fix". Ships the harness, a per-project TOML config, a fake-worker selftest, check-in signals and the 2026-10-12 haiku-cc failure catalogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose an AWF (Agentic Workflow Firewall) failure from an error, workflow run URL, or symptom. Covers auth (api-proxy, enterprise/BYOK Copilot, OIDC, mcpg), ARC/DinD and self-hosted runners, alternative runtimes (gVisor/Kata/chroot), Squid/DNS/egress denials, CI and gh-aw safe-output failures, and suspected security regressions. Routes to the canonical diagnosis registry in docs/diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route HugeGraph MCP regression testing tasks to the current public tool surface, including inspection, read-only queries, Gremlin generation, extraction, controlled import, schema validate/dry-run, safety guards, and admin-gated tool checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO — baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds end-to-end predictive modeling pipelines on tabular datasets—data exploration, preprocessing, baseline modeling, and mandatory optimization—producing valid saved predictions in the required output format. Use for any supervised machine learning or data modeling task, including classification and regression on tabular data, Kaggle-style competitions or submission-file challenges, training a model to predict a target from features, or requests to fit/tune/evaluate models with scikit-learn, XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and similar non-deep-learning methods. Runs fully automated end-to-end without asking the user for intermediate decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude adapter for diagnosing PlainTab bugs, broken flows, startup issues, storage or wallpaper regressions, and performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing PlainTab bugs, broken UI behavior, failing extension/web-mode flows, storage or wallpaper regressions, startup issues, or performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix mini-program failures through reproducible, evidence-driven root-cause analysis across source, state, asynchronous timing, caches, mock data, build versions, platform behavior, devices, cloud calls, and external services. Use when users report white screens, crashes, stale or jumping values, missing data, intermittent behavior, permission failures, performance stalls, device-only defects, API or cloud-function errors, source-versus-build mismatches, or regressions whose cause is not yet established. Freezes the observation environment, ranks competing hypotheses, runs discriminating checks, creates a failing regression test before repair, covers analogous states, and never hides a known failure with longer waits, swallowed errors, forced success, or cosmetic patches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze LLM eval results — score breakdowns by category, regression detection vs baseline, failure clustering. Use when asked to "analyze our eval results", "did the model regress", or "cluster the eval failures".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare API performance across versions — regression detection and root cause analysis. Use when asked "did performance regress", "compare API latency across versions", or "why is this slower".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, shipping, or regression-testing a SKILL.md and you hold one or more captured trajectories where that skill was actually loaded. Translates the skill's instructions into behavior constraints, then reports which were EXERCISED (coverage) versus untested, and flags any that were in-scope but VIOLATED (compliance) — a cheap single-trajectory test-adequacy gate. It surfaces untested instructions rather than auto-blocking, and escalates fail-closed only when a violation touches shared repo state, never-surface memory, or self-modification. Complements skill-counterfactual-audit (which measures EFFECT) and skill-causal-curation (which measures contribution); this one asks ADEQUACY. Backed by the agent-skill-coverage metric (arxiv 2606.20659v2). Triggers on skill review, ship gating, and regression-testing a skill against its trajectories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design validation and maintained regression protection before test authoring. Use for TDD increments, acceptance or regression evidence, test boundary/oracle decisions, and multi-factor interaction coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive documentation of Claude's capabilities for visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, and quality assurance automation. Use when setting up testing infrastructure, implementing visual regression, or understanding agent testing capabilities. (project)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BackstopJS gives agents a repeatable way to capture reference screenshots, compare UI states, and flag visual regressions before changes ship. This skill centers on the real BackstopJS project and turns browser-based layout comparison into a structured QA workflow for web teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Agent QA's CLI and MCP server to author, validate, run, debug, and triage natural-language web and mobile regression tests with persistent test memory and reviewable run evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify fix commits address security findings without introducing new bugs or regressions. Analyzes diffs for anti-patterns like removed validation, weakened access control, reduced error handling, reordered external calls, and changed integer operations. Generates structured FIX_REVIEW_REPORT with finding status tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate publication-ready statistical tables using gt, kableExtra, or flextable. Covers descriptive statistics, regression results, ANOVA tables, correlation matrices, and APA formatting. Use when creating descriptive statistics tables, formatting regression or ANOVA output, building correlation matrices, producing APA-style tables for academic papers, or generating tables for Quarto and R Markdown documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive fix verification methodology to ensure bugs are truly fixed. Use after implementing any bug fix to verify it works and hasn't caused regressions. Keywords: verify, confirm, test, validate, check, ensure, regression, fixed

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。