「exam」の検索結果

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Generate release notes for a new Boundless version. Fetches PR details, explores code changes, and produces prover-facing documentation with config examples, migration guides, and worked examples. Use when the user wants to write release notes, changelog entries, or upgrade guides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Example project-specific skill template. Use as a starting point when creating guidelines for your own projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arkcli +code-example：为指定基础模型生成多语言（Python / Go / Java / Node / curl）调用示例代码并写入本地文件。数据源是火山方舟 OpenTOP OpenGetSampleCode。当用户需要拿某个基础模型的 SDK / curl 调用示例、保存为本地接入模板时使用。反触发：TTS/ASR/语音模型没有 arkcli 示例代码路径，不能靠补版本解决，只能转 models search 说明当前不支持。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cultural adaptation for translated content. Run AFTER blog-translate completes. Adjusts brand examples, CTAs, legal references, and formality for the target market (German, French, Japanese, Spanish, etc.). Deep cultural adaptation of translated blog posts. Goes beyond translation to swap brand examples, adapt CTAs, substitute legal references, localize statistic sources where possible, and adjust formality (Sie/du, tu/vous, formal/informal). Built-in profiles for DACH, Francophone, Hispanic, and Japanese markets, plus a custom-locale template. Makes content feel locally authored, not translated. Use when user says "localize blog", "blog localize", "cultural adaptation", "adapt for Germany", "adapt for France", "lokalisieren", "localiser", "adaptar".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create self-explanation prompts that deepen understanding of worked examples, texts, or diagrams. Use when students read material passively without engaging with underlying principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when looking up library documentation, API references, framework patterns, or code examples for ANY library (React, Next.js, Vue, Django, Laravel, etc.) and the Context7 MCP server is unavailable or not configured. Fetches the same current docs directly via the Context7 REST API as a fallback. Triggers on: how to use library, API docs, framework pattern, import usage, library example.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

スキル（SKILL.md）を新規作成または更新し、リモートリポジトリへ PR を作成・更新する。SKILL.md は正常系、references に参考情報と異常系、scripts に利用スクリプトを置き、すべて汎用化してパラメータを .env.example に外出しする（実値は .env）。毎回同じ形のプロジェクトを作るスキルには templates/ を同梱し、汎用スキャフォルダー（scaffold_from_template.py）でテンプレートから生成して開始できるようにする。会社・個別プロジェクト情報を排除して秘匿化し、Step 番号は整数で統一。最後に番号整合・自動化観点（Learn は MCP で検証、ブラウザ操作は VS Code 統合ブラウザ）をレビューし、既存のオープン PR があればそれを更新してコンフリクトを避け、無関係なら新規 PR を作成しつつマージ順を提示する。

Proof writing and verification techniques for mathematical reasoning. Covers 13 proof strategies with canonical worked examples — direct, contrapositive, contradiction, cases, WLOG, vacuous/trivial, biconditional, counterexample, existence (constructive and non-constructive), uniqueness, induction (weak, strong, structural), pigeonhole/double-counting, and diagonal argument/invariants. Use when writing, verifying, or selecting proof strategies for any mathematical claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hook recipes and working examples — plugin hooks, frontmatter hooks in skills/agents/commands, prompt-based LLM hooks, and complete code examples in Python and Node.js. Use when building hook scripts, integrating hooks into plugins, implementing prompt-based hooks, or looking for hook configuration patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test harness for Claude Code skill argument substitution — demonstrates capture-block pre-declaration, XML tag referencing, unintentional variable corruption in code blocks, and correct placement of shell examples in reference files. Use when verifying substitution behavior before applying a pattern to other skills, testing how arguments flow from skill invocations, or understanding the pre-declaration and reference file pattern with greet/farewell/inspect actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Example project-specific skill template based on a real production application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High-precision semantic search and content retrieval via Exa API. Use when: (1) Deep research requiring semantic understanding, (2) Code documentation and examples lookup, (3) Company/professional research, (4) AI-powered comprehensive research tasks, (5) URL content extraction with structured output. Triggers: "research", "find papers", "code examples", "company info", "LinkedIn profiles", "deep analysis". Differentiator: Exa excels at semantic/neural search while grok-search is better for real-time news and general web content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate one Anabasis v2 campaign from its log and turn what it shows into findings with one owner each. Answers whether a comparison's reading (step, no-step, not-scored) may be believed, whether a fail was the solver's or the exam's, whether the harness could know the exam, whether the tasks bracket the solver, whether the campaign is climbing, and where the hours and dollars went. Reads evidence; starts no solve, session or round, and changes no verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when working with Twilio communication APIs for SMS/MMS messaging, voice calls, phone number management, TwiML, webhook integration, two-way SMS conversations, bulk sending, or production deployment of telephony features. Includes official Twilio patterns, production code examples from Twilio-Aldea (provider-agnostic webhooks, signature validation, TwiML responses), and comprehensive TypeScript examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor an over-long or poorly structured SKILL.md by extracting examples to references/EXAMPLES.md, splitting compound procedures, and reorganizing sections for progressive disclosure. Use when a skill exceeds the 500-line CI limit, when code blocks dominate the skill body, when a procedure step contains multiple unrelated operations, or after a content update pushed the skill over the line limit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up systematic data labeling workflows using Label Studio or similar tools. Implement quality controls, measure inter-annotator agreement, manage labeler teams, and integrate labeled data into ML training pipelines. Use when starting a supervised ML project that requires labeled training data, when model performance is limited by insufficient labeled examples, when labeling text, images, audio, or video, or when implementing active learning to prioritize the most valuable examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将英语试卷、参考答案与听力音频制作成可离线使用的互动 HTML 讲评课件。用于英语讲试卷、阅读讲评、听力自动接入选段与挖空精听，覆盖阅读、七选五、完形、语法填空和写作；内置答案原件溯源核对（answers.json + source-ledger + 逐题审计）与听力三档降级接入，音频缺失或答案对不上时构建直接报错。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks "How do I...", "What is...", "How does X work in Prismatic?", "What's the best practice for...", wants to understand Prismatic concepts, features, or architecture, or needs guidance on marketplace deployment, customer connections, embedded UI, config pages, triggers, or other Prismatic product features. Search and retrieve documentation from prismatic.io/docs and reference examples from github.com/prismatic-io/examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a PlayCanvas feature the project does not use yet, to find and adapt the official example matching the installed version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebuild, re-pin, and republish Pulp's downstream demo/example repos against a new or the latest SDK. Routes natural-language requests — "update the demos to the latest SDK", "rebuild the examples against the new SDK", "check the demos still build on the new SDK", "bump every consumer's SDK pin", "open the SDK-update PRs", "republish the demo packages" — to the `pulp minos` Managed SDK Consumer Sweep: `sweep` (build + measure min-OS floors), `update` (bump each repo's SDK pin, open PRs), and `publish-runbook` (per-repo rebuild/package/publish steps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将课程资料（PPT/Word/PDF/截图）按章节生成深度知识清单、教授式详细讲解和交互式章节测试，帮助学生高效期末复习。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。