Recover from execute_code_sandbox failures by writing Python scripts to files and executing via run_shell
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,339 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Recover from execute_code_sandbox failures by writing Python scripts to files and executing via run_shell
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback workflow for executing Python code when execute_code_sandbox fails
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback method to execute Python code when execute_code_sandbox fails with e2b errors
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback from execute_code_sandbox to file-based run_shell execution when sandbox fails
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback pattern for executing Python code when sandbox execution fails by writing scripts to disk and running via shell
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback method for executing Python when execute_code_sandbox fails with unknown errors
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback pattern for executing Python code when execute_code_sandbox fails by writing to file and running via shell
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback pattern for when execute_code_sandbox fails - write script to file and execute directly with run_shell
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reliable Python execution workflow when execute_code_sandbox or shell_agent fail
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback pattern for executing Python code when execute_code_sandbox fails
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fallback workflow for executing Python code when execute_code_sandbox fails repeatedly
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-step script execution workflow for debugging when shell_agent and execute_code_sandbox consistently fail
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Windows privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a standard user shell to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM: token impersonation via SeImpersonate and SeAssignPrimaryToken privileges using JuicyPotato, PrintSpoofer, GodPotato, SweetPotato, and RoguePotato; service misconfigurations including unquoted service paths, weak service DACLs, writable service binaries, and insecure service creation permissions; AlwaysInstallElevated MSI exploitation; DLL hijacking through search order abuse, phantom DLL loading, and writable PATH directory injection; UAC bypass techniques via fodhelper.exe, eventvwr.exe, CMSTP, and environment variable manipulation; scheduled task abuse for writable task actions and new task creation; registry autorun exploitation for persistence and escalation; PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527) for remote and local privilege escalation; and credential harvesting from SAM database extraction, DPAPI blob decryption, LSA secret dumping, and Credential Manager enumeration. Integrates automated enumeration with WinPEAS, PowerUp, SharpUp, Seatbelt, and BeRoot. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-side visibility for purple team operations. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1548 (Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism) and T1574 (Hijack Execution Flow). Designed for authorized penetration testing, red team engagements, and CTF competitions where you hold a standard user shell and need to escalate to SYSTEM or local Administrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build sandboxed applications for secure code execution. Load when building AI code execution, code interpreters, CI/CD systems, interactive dev environments, or executing untrusted code. Covers Sandbox SDK lifecycle, commands, files, code interpreter, and preview URLs. Biases towards retrieval from Cloudflare docs over pre-trained knowledge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect command injection, eval/exec usage, remote execution, or arbitrary code loading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
在 Ubuntu 自托管测试机上编排 Nexent 每日分层全量测试、维护本地测试基线和 P0 Playwright 候选代码,并将证据仅保存在本机。用于 OpenCode 执行 Daily/手工全量测试;不用于 PR 测试或外部结果发布。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Nexent requirements and bugfixes through SPEC acceptance, traditional UT and applicable D1-D5 test design, product/test implementation, local verification, and delivery evidence. Use for features, fixes, refactors and post-development test backfill across APIs, UI, model and Agent behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing, debugging, or reviewing Nexent frontend pages, React components, hooks, API services, TypeScript types, styling, or localization under frontend/. Includes UI requests without file paths. Skip backend-only work, Python tests, and documentation-only changes with no frontend behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunting skill for xss vulnerabilities. Built from 174 public bug bounty reports. Use when hunting xss on any target. For markup injection that reflects raw HTML but does NOT execute JavaScript (no `<script>`/event-handler execution), see hunt-html-injection — escalate here once script execution is possible.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes a written ulw-plan work plan with Boulder state, evidence ledger, worktree discipline, and parallel subagents. Use when the user says ulw-execute or asks to run a .omo/plans plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convene an AI executive board of directors (CEO, CFO, COO, CLO, CISO sub-agent personas) to vet a business idea, product concept, new service offering, M&A target, or operational initiative — and deliver an integrated board memo with a Go/No-Go recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user wants an idea vetted, stress-tested, or reviewed from multiple executive perspectives; asks to "present this to the board," "run this by the boardroom," "vet this idea," "poke holes in this plan," or "prep me for a board meeting"; or shares a business plan, pitch, proposal, or initiative document and asks for structured executive feedback. Also trigger when the user asks for a Go/No-Go decision, risk review across finance/legal/security/operations, or preparation for presenting an initiative to real leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Choosing between coding agents on evidence: compare executor or agent choices on reproducible tasks using quality, cost, time, tool, and evidence metrics. Use when the user says: agent-evaluation, agent evaluation, agent eval, agent benchmark, executor evaluation, executor benchmark, compare agents, compare codex claude.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, runs, debugs, and operates applications on AWS Lambda MicroVMs — Firecracker-isolated, snapshot-resumable serverless compute environments running inside a container with up to 8 hr lifetimes. Applicable when workloads need strong isolation between tenants, isolated serverless compute, sandbox compute, or secure multi-tenant execution. Also suited for AI/agent code-execution sandboxes, interactive code playgrounds and notebooks (Jupyter, REPLs, dev environments running user-supplied code), reinforcement-learning environments, multi-tenant CI executors and build runners, sessionful game or simulation servers, or isolated security scanners. Also applicable when the workload needs long-lived sessions, a real port-listening server (gRPC, WebSocket, custom TCP protocols), state preserved across periods of inactivity (suspend/resume), container-level access (FUSE, eBPF, custom syscalls), or session-affine routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process use when you need to work with database indexing. This skill provides index design and optimization with comprehensive guidance and automation. Trigger with phrases like "create indexes", "optimize indexes", or "improve query performance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。