758 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Discover the pull requests this Paperclip instance opened (never community contributions), report what each is for and how confident we are that it is merge-ready, and automatically drive the non-ready ones back to green with /prepare-paperclip-pr — without ever merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce low-fidelity black-and-white UI wireframes as SVGs or viewer pages. Use when asked to wireframe, sketch a screen, draft a layout, make a low-fi mockup, or publish wireframes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handle confidential GitHub Security Advisory response for Paperclip. Use when coordinating advisory triage, private-fork fixes, CVE/publication steps, and immediate security releases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A crisp greybox / blueprint lo-fi wireframe — neutral grey blocks on a pale page, image placeholders drawn as a rectangle with a diagonal X, text shown as solid "lorem bars" of varying widths, sharp 1.5–2px borders, and a single monospace redline accent for annotations. Reads like a structural blueprint before any visual design is applied. Use when the brief asks for "greybox", "blueprint wireframe", "lo-fi dashboard", "low fidelity", "线框图", or "灰盒原型".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit cloned or reimplemented websites for fidelity gaps, tracking scripts, source-brand and language residue, placeholders, and risky external dependencies. Use before handoff or deployment, or when asked to review a website clone for cleanup and readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A lo-fi multi-screen MOBILE flow wireframe — three or four phone frames laid out in a row on a board, showing a connected user flow (Onboarding → Home feed → Item detail → Confirm). Grey-box content inside each device, dashed connector arrows + numbered step labels between screens, and a couple of annotation callouts. Reads like an app flow pinned to a whiteboard before any pixels are committed. Use when the brief asks for "mobile wireframe", "app flow", "user flow wireframe", "lo-fi mobile", "low fidelity", "线框图", "移动端线框", or "App 流程".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative design-to-code feedback loop. Critique → adjust → ship cycle for tightening visual fidelity between brief and built UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn messy user research notes, interviews, support tickets, surveys, and product context into an evidence-backed decision room: a single HTML artifact with an evidence ledger, theme map, confidence heatmap, opportunity matrix, decision memo, and experiment queue. Use when teams need to move from qualitative signals to product or design decisions without fabricating certainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate Figma designs into production-ready code with 1:1 visual fidelity. Useful for handing off Figma frames straight to a frontend agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read, create, and edit .docx documents with formatting and layout fidelity via OpenAI's document skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hyperframes-based video template for retro pixel deck motion design. Use when users want a high-fidelity, multi-scene HTML-to-video composition with advanced transitions, interactive preview controls, and ready-to-render default style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Train neural models (LSTM, Transformer, N-BEATS) on market data using npx neural-trader with confidence intervals
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
7-section repo readiness report from `metaharness genome {path}`. Returns repo_type / agent_topology / risk_score / mcp_surface / test_confidence / publish_readiness. Pure-read; degrades gracefully (ADR-150).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5-dimension harness readiness scorecard from `metaharness score {path}`. Returns harnessFit / compileConfidence / taskCoverage / toolSafety / memoryUsefulness + estCostPerRunUsd + scaffoldReady. Pure-read; subprocess invocation; degrades gracefully when MetaHarness is absent (ADR-150 architectural constraint).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The design process for high-fidelity, polished work — the system prompt tells Claude to invoke it before starting any design
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the current diff, or a PR number/branch/path target, for correctness bugs (plus reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups where the model's review recipe covers them) at the given effort level (low|medium|high|xhigh|max: from few high-confidence findings up to many, some of them uncertain; ultra: deep multi-agent review in the cloud); with no level given, it reuses the level you typed last. Pass --comment to post findings as inline PR comments, or --fix to apply the findings to the working tree after the review. Pass --max-findings <n> to report up to n findings, or --max-findings all for every finding. The choice stays until you pass --max-findings default. For ultra on a GitHub.com PR target, --post asks to post the finished review’s findings to the PR as a single comment from the user’s GitHub account (not a review; the launch dialog still confirms in interactive sessions, while non-interactive mode posts on the flag alone) and --no-post hides that option.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts protein-small-molecule binding poses with DiffDock and DiffDock-L from PDB or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2. Covers batch docking, pose triage, confidence interpretation, and validation. Use for molecular docking and virtual-screening pose generation, not binding-affinity prediction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read one supplied paper closely enough to reconstruct how its authors actually got there, rather than restating what the abstract claims. Use for 精读论文, 讲透这篇论文, 把这篇读懂, 作者为什么这么设计, 这个公式怎么推出来的, paper x-ray, and deep single-paper comprehension before building on, reviewing, presenting, or citing that paper. Recovers the real starting point and the bet the authors placed, separates load-bearing design from decoration, grounds each key formula in a worked micro-example with concrete numbers, and checks how far the evidence actually reaches, including where the authors are confident and where the paper does not report something. Delivers a structured Markdown long-read by default. Not a summary, not a translation, not a peer review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage failed Agent QA runs with MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, fixed failure categories, confidence, and actionable next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate project-specific AGENTS.md and companion rules by analyzing a codebase. Supports full, minimal, update, and dry-run modes with package-manager detection, monorepos, backups, managed blocks, confidence scoring, and command validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access matrix of role-by-module permissions, with per-role scope, confidentiality level and SME tier, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for access reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。