「find」の検索結果

Remediates Google Cloud Security Command Center findings, including IAM permission fixes, cloud resource misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and Toxic Combinations. Use when asked to fix, remediate, or mitigate a Security Command Center finding or address attack paths. Don't use for general IAM policy querying without a Security Command Center finding. For runtime threat detections, this skill provides containment and investigation guidance rather than automated configuration fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Free domain research and availability checking. No API keys or credentials required. Uses RDAP (1195+ TLDs) with whois CLI fallback for universal coverage. Checks if domains are available, searches keywords across TLDs, performs WHOIS/RDAP lookups, checks expiry dates, and finds nameservers. Use when the agent needs to: check if a domain is available, search for domains, find who owns a domain, check domain expiration, get nameservers, bulk check domains, or do any domain research. Triggers on: 'check domain', 'is domain available', 'search domains', 'domain availability', 'who owns this domain', 'whois', 'domain expiry', 'when does domain expire', 'nameservers for', 'domain research', 'find domains for', 'domain ideas', 'bulk domain check'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ethical people-finding and identity verification via parallel research agents across people-search sites, social media, public records, and reverse phone/email/image/username lookups, with confidence-scored results requiring 3+ matching identifiers. USE WHEN find person, locate person, reconnect, lost contact, old friend, reverse phone lookup, who owns this email, reverse image search, find by username, verify identity, people search, public-data background check, who is this caller. NOT FOR structured due-diligence or company/entity intelligence investigations, or general web research synthesis (use Research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial analysis deploying parallel expert agents to stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans — decomposes into atomic claims, attacks them, then steelmans and counter-argues, producing severity-ranked findings with remediation. USE WHEN red team, attack idea, counterarguments, critique, stress test, devil's advocate, find weaknesses, break this, poke holes, strongest objection. NOT FOR collaborative debate to find best path (use Council).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a deterministic, read-only health check on an Obsidian wiki. Use for lint, vault health check, audit wiki health, find orphans, find dead links, frontmatter audit, provenance audit, or wiki audit. Reports graph, link, frontmatter, provenance-ledger, empty-section, and stale-index findings; it does not reason broadly or repair files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs graph-assisted triage of a single security finding, SARIF result, weAudit annotation, suspicious function, or report excerpt using Trailmark reachability, entrypoint paths, taint, privilege-boundary, blast-radius, caller/callee, and neighborhood evidence. Use when deciding whether one candidate issue is reachable, prioritizing a finding before PoC work, preparing evidence for exploit validation, or checking whether a static-analysis result is actionable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find Dropbox files and folders relevant to a user request. Use when the user asks to search Dropbox, find a document, locate recent files, browse a folder, identify likely source files, or narrow down where content lives before reading, sharing, organizing, or restoring it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill helps users extract YouTube influencer profiles including social links, subscriber counts, and channel stats via the BrowserAct API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like finding YouTube creators for specific keywords, discovering influencers for a marketing campaign, extracting YouTube channel contact emails, scraping YouTube influencer social media links, gathering subscriber counts for YouTube creators, researching top YouTube channels in a specific niche, compiling a list of YouTube content creators with recent uploads, collecting YouTube creator profiles for outreach, extracting total views and video counts for specific YouTube influencers, building a database of YouTube partners for market research, finding YouTube influencers who uploaded videos this month, or monitoring competitor influencer activities on YouTube.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers Threads user accounts by keyword, extracting profile data including username, display name, verification status, biography, and follower count. Use when user asks to find Threads accounts, search Threads profiles, discover Threads users by keyword, look up Threads creators, find influencers on Threads, search for people on Threads, get Threads user details, collect Threads profile information, find accounts related to a topic on Threads, search Threads for accounts by name or keyword, or enumerate Threads users matching a search term.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill helps users extract GitHub repository project details and contributor contact information using keywords, stars, and update dates. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like search for GitHub projects by keywords, find top open-source contributors in specific domains, extract developer contacts from GitHub repositories, discover trending repositories with high stars, gather contributor profiles and social links for tech recruiting, retrieve GitHub project descriptions and metrics, build developer communities by finding active contributors, search for repositories updated recently, collect personal website and Twitter links of developers, generate targeted leads for developer tools, or track active open-source contributors for collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts business contact details from Google Maps search results and place detail pages, then visits each business website to collect emails, phone numbers, and social media profiles (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, Discord). Use when user mentions Google Maps contact extraction, maps email scraper, business lead generation from Google Maps, find emails from maps, scrape Google Maps businesses, maps business contacts, get phone from Google Maps, social media from maps listing, competitor research from maps, local business contact list, maps data export, google maps scraper, extract contacts from google maps, find business email google, gmaps leads, maps email finder, or wants to replicate Google Maps business data extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-stage pipeline for validating that vulnerability findings are real, reachable, and exploitable, preventing wasted effort on hallucinated findings, dead code paths, or findings with unrealistic preconditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Company discovery and deep research skill. Researches a company's product and ICP, discovers target companies to sell to using Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a Plan→Research→Synthesize pattern, and scores ICP fit — compiled into a scored research report and CSV. Supports depth modes (quick/deep/deeper) for balancing scale vs intelligence. Use when the user wants to: (1) find companies to sell to, (2) research potential customers, (3) discover companies matching an ICP, (4) build a target company list, (5) do market research on prospects. Triggers: "find companies to sell to", "company research", "find prospects", "ICP research", "target companies", "who should we sell to", "market research", "lead research", "prospect list".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to find posts, videos, reels, shorts, tweets, or social content that overperformed versus a creator, brand, or competitor baseline. Finds outliers, explains why they worked, extracts hooks and formats, and produces a practical swipe file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List, find, and show Azure resources across subscriptions or resource groups. Handles prompts like "list the websites in my subscription", "list my web apps", "show my app services", "list virtual machines", "list my VMs", "show storage accounts", "find container apps", and "what resources do I have". USE FOR: list websites, list web apps, list app services, show websites in subscription, resource inventory, find resources by tag, tag analysis, orphaned resource discovery (not for cost analysis), unattached disks, count resources by type, cross-subscription lookup, and Azure Resource Graph queries. DO NOT USE FOR: deploying/changing resources (use azure-deploy), cost optimization (use cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin), or non-Azure clouds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。