「impact」の検索結果

Use when reviewing a .NET pull request for breaking changes that may affect other microservice repositories. Detects cross-repo API, DTO, endpoint, EF entity, and NuGet-package breaks, and checks whether a compatible downstream PR already exists. Keywords: cross-repo impact, breaking change, microservice compatibility, downstream break, compatible PR, blast radius review, api compatibility, contract break, dto shape change, endpoint break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route codebase-structure questions (who calls X, where used, change-impact) to an existing code-graph first: impact, tests-for, dead cheaper, never more precise; grep routine. Also 'call graph'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

変更が波及する全モジュール・全フローを特定し、集計ルール、状態遷移、符号反転、 コピペ差分、表示/帳票/APIの整合性を監査するスキル。Impact Mapで変更核から 影響範囲を可視化し、Consistency Matrixで横断整合を検証し、Copy Propagation Review戦略でコピペ実装を効率的にレビューする。 Use when one change affects multiple modules, reports, flows, or copied implementations. Audits aggregation totals, state transitions, sign inversion, and cross-module consistency.

エラーや例外シナリオを顧客体験(CX)の観点で体系的に分析し、改善優先度を付ける スキル。6軸評価（影響度・頻度・復旧容易性・メッセージ品質・感情的影響・ ビジネスコスト）でスコアリングし、Impact vs Effort マトリクスで改善施策を 優先順位付けする。Use when analyzing error scenarios from customer experience perspective, evaluating error message quality, prioritizing error UX improvements, or creating CX-focused error analysis reports. Triggers: "CXエラー分析", "error experience", "エラーUX改善", "customer experience error", "エラーメッセージ品質", "error scenario analysis", "顧客体験エラー評価"

Reads a risk register together with meeting notes and incident reports and returns a draft update pack: existing risks whose exposure, controls, ownership or status the sources say have changed, new risk candidates, closure candidates, and the one owner decision each item needs. Never assigns or changes a likelihood, impact, score or colour and never edits the register; owners decide. Use when the user asks to "update the risk register from these minutes", "refresh the register with the incidents since the last review", "reconcile the register against the notes" or "what changed on our risks". Do not use for writing up an incident itself, use incident-postmortem-drafter or data-incident-impact-brief instead; to track actions from minutes, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Works Council Representative archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, employee-impact risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "review this as the works council would", "what would the works council say about this rollout", "prepare me for the staff council consultation", "find the employee-impact gaps in this plan" or "pressure-test this deck from the employee representative side". Do not use for people strategy, restructuring or HR policy, use chro-reviewer instead; for whether frontline staff will adopt or work around the change, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submission-grade remote-sensing Nature/high-impact journal figure workflow for Python or R. Use whenever the user asks to create, revise, audit, or polish manuscript figures, multi-panel scientific plots, map-led composites, remote-sensing image plates, sensor/product workflow figures, validation/error/uncertainty panels, or journal-ready SVG/PDF/TIFF outputs, especially for Nature-family, Remote Sensing of Environment, ISPRS, IEEE TGRS, or other high-impact venues. Before plotting, define the figure's conclusion, evidence logic, export needs, and review risks. If the user has not chosen Python or R, ask "Python or R?" and stop. Use only the selected backend for figure generation, previewing, exporting, and QA. Supports matplotlib/seaborn and ggplot2/patchwork/ComplexHeatmap. Not for dashboards or Illustrator/Figma-first infographics. Also trigger on general academic-writing figure needs even without the word "Nature", such as making figures/plots for a paper, scientific/academic plotting, data visualization for a manuscript, and Chinese phrasings like 遥感论文配图、学术写作配图、科研绘图、科研作图、地图出图、论文图表、可视化.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show ponytail's measured impact as a compact scoreboard: less code, less cost, more speed, from the benchmark medians. One-shot display, not a persistent mode, and not a per-repo number. Trigger: /ponytail-gain, "ponytail gain", "what does ponytail save", "show ponytail impact", "ponytail scoreboard".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern Power Automate flows and Power Apps at scale using the FlowStudio MCP cached store. Classify flows by business impact, detect orphaned resources, audit connector usage, enforce compliance standards, manage notification rules, and compute governance scores — all without Dataverse or the CoE Starter Kit. Load this skill when asked to: tag or classify flows, set business impact, assign ownership, detect orphans, audit connectors, check compliance, compute archive scores, manage notification rules, run a governance review, generate a compliance report, offboard a maker, or any task that involves writing governance metadata to flows. Requires a FlowStudio for Teams or MCP Pro+ subscription — see https://mcp.flowstudio.app

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use 'could potentially' — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawのGit履歴からリリース用の変更履歴を作り直します。利用者に関わる変更をまとめ、Issue・PRへの参照や貢献者の記載漏れを検証します。

• stable版公開前の変更履歴作成
• 前回のbeta版からの差分整理
• 貢献者とPR参照の記載確認

コード変更を確認する人に向けて、図や差分による要約、変更前後の動作証拠、取り消しやすさと影響範囲を短く整理したプルリクエスト本文を書くスキル。

• プルリクエスト本文を作成したいとき
• 構成変更をツリーや差分で説明したいとき
• 画面変更の前後を証拠で示したいとき

Govern cross-module regression in large repositories with a REGRESSION.md ledger that records each module's downstream consumers and executable acceptance command. After a change, run the changed module and every affected downstream command, and use observed exit codes as regression evidence under the project's delivery policy. Use for module regression, regression ledgers, impact audits, downstream verification, and changes where modifying A may break B.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

配送の遅延・破損・紛失・数量不足に対し、証拠収集から補償請求、運送会社との交渉までを整理し、損失額や顧客への影響に応じた対応判断を支えるスキル。

• 配送の遅延や紛失に対応したいとき
• 貨物破損の補償請求を準備したいとき
• 運送会社の料金や責任を争うとき

売上・返金・重複課金を請求データから整理し、チーム課金や利用権限の実装まで確認するスキル。料金表示と実際の動作を照合し、運営の判断材料をまとめます。

• 売上と契約状況を把握したいとき
• 重複課金や返金の原因調査
• チーム課金の実装を確認したいとき

ECC ToolsのGitHub Appで起きるPRの過剰作成や利用上限の抜け、高額モデルの意図しない使用をコードから追い、費用増加の原因と修正を検証するスキル。

• PRの過剰作成の原因調査
• 利用上限を超える同時処理の点検
• 無料枠での高額モデル利用の確認