Organize qualitative research data into an affinity diagram with themes, clusters, and insight statements. Use when synthesizing large amounts of qualitative data from interviews, observations, or surveys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
206 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Organize qualitative research data into an affinity diagram with themes, clusters, and insight statements. Use when synthesizing large amounts of qualitative data from interviews, observations, or surveys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned product-marketing context discipline. Use when a project needs a shared record of product, audience, ICP, positioning, objections, customer language, proof, and goals, or when that record needs updating. NOT FOR: writing a campaign (use suede-campaign-in-a-box), conducting new customer interviews (use suede-customer-research), or publishing brand claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned operations-assessment discipline that maps how work actually happens before anyone designs a system: floor-level interviews with the people who do the work, an inventory of every silo including spreadsheets and inboxes used as databases, friction quantified in the requester's own numbers, opportunities ranked by annual value against build complexity, and adoption watched for the thirty days after launch. Use when nobody can answer what to automate, when an operation needs auditing before a build, when tribal-knowledge and key-person risk has to surface, or when a shipped system is quietly being routed around. NOT FOR: deciding what to build and in what order once the map exists (use suede-ops-architecture); researching external customers rather than internal operators (use suede-customer-research); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); product instrumentation and dashboards (use suede-analytics); getting a new user to first value (use suede-onboarding).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean up raw interview transcripts while preserving meaning and speaker voice. Use after conducting interviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze interviews using Jobs to Be Done framework. Extract push, pull, anxiety, and habit forces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides user research and research ops. Use when running interviews, usability tests, surveys, or synthesis to de-risk product decisions; not experiments or review mining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route product-growth requests to one Gingiris specialist skill. Use when broad or explicit requests about launch, Product Hunt, GitHub/open-source growth, SEO/GEO, B2B/PLG, ASO, interviews, competitors, KOL, UGC, community, content, backlinks, or README conversion, including 出海增长、产品发布、找增长渠道、竞品分析、 用户访谈、社区运营. Ask short multiple-choice questions only when the route is unclear; then load and run one specialist rather than the full collection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kundenforschung datensparsam und einwilligungsorientiert planen, durchführen und auswerten. Nutze diesen Skill für Interviewleitfäden, Umfragen, Usability-Tests, die Auswertung vorhandener Gespräche, Support-Tickets oder Bewertungen, und für Personas, Segmente und Jobs-to-be-Done. Klärt vorab Zweck, Rechtsgrundlage, Einwilligung, Aufzeichnung, Pseudonymisierung und Aufbewahrung, wertet nur innerhalb des Stichprobenrahmens aus und trennt Befund von Entscheidung. Beachtet DSGVO, BDSG und Beschäftigtendaten; Österreich und Schweiz werden getrennt behandelt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Historical argumentation, evidence-based writing, and oral history methods. Covers thesis development for historical arguments, evidence selection and deployment, counterargument construction and rebuttal, historical writing conventions, and the methodology of oral history as both source and practice. Use when constructing historical arguments, writing analytical essays, conducting oral history interviews, or assessing the quality of historical writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews a researcher in rounds until an idea, design, or draft has no unexamined decision — numbered questions, each with why it matters and a recommended answer, facts looked up rather than asked, and settled decisions written to a file. Stages are idea (topic or hunch to a falsifiable question and contribution claim), design (estimand, identification, sample and power, measurement, analysis plan, pre-registration, venue), and defend (reviewer objections to a finished design or draft). Use when the user says "grill me", asks to stress-test or poke holes in an idea, design, or plan, asks what they are assuming, or brings an idea that is not yet a design. --plan grills software or process plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opens a deliverable (talk, course module, paper, book chapter, or referee report) for AI-assisted work across sessions. Interviews the author for the manifest, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, an append-only HANDOFF.md, a numbered planning/ wiki with open questions, an inbox/ for dictated braindumps, a gitignored checks/, and the house deck template for talks. Use when starting deadline-driven work that spans sessions, or when asked to open a deliverable, set up a talk, paper, or module for the pipeline, or make a manifest. Not for one-off tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews a researcher in rounds (idea, design, or defend stage) until no decision in a research idea, design, or draft is left assumed, recommending an answer to each question and writing settled decisions to a file. Use for 'grill me', stress-testing a design, or an idea not yet a design; --plan for software or process plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opens a talk, module, paper, chapter, or referee report as a multi-session deliverable. Interviews the author, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, HANDOFF.md, the planning/ wiki, inbox/, and checks/. Use for deadline-driven work spanning sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up Seekter for a new candidate. Interviews the user one question at a time and writes profile/profile.md, profile/settings.json and profile/documents/. Use when the user runs /seekter-init, says "set up seekter", or when profile/profile.md is missing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your Personal Finance Manager for Canadians — an AI financial planning partner that conducts thorough financial interviews, builds complete plans, generates interactive dashboards, and provides ongoing coaching. Use this skill whenever someone asks about budgeting, saving, investing, debt strategy, retirement planning, tax optimization, government benefits, insurance, RRSPs, TFSAs, RESPs, CPP, OAS, or any aspect of personal finance in a Canadian context. Also triggers for "should I buy this?", "can I afford this?", financial check-ins, plan updates, life change impacts on finances, or any request to build or review a financial plan. Even if the user just says "help me with my money" or "I need a budget", this skill should activate. Canada-focused.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce customer case studies from interviews or data — Problem, Solution, Results structure with perception engineering and quality gates. Use when "case study", "customer story", "testimonial", "success story", "client results", or any request to document a customer win.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert product discovery guidance for user research and problem validation. Use when conducting user interviews, validating problems, applying jobs-to-be-done framework, sizing opportunities, customer segmentation, competitive analysis, prototype testing, usability testing, designing surveys, or synthesizing research insights. Covers discovery sprints, continuous discovery, and research operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The domain expert's product manager in a project repository run by the Boring Factory. Use when the expert brings a need or an idea, wants to clarify, change or resume a feature ("reprends la fiche"), asks what is happening with a feature, has a builder's question to answer, or has a preview to try and accept. Interviews one question at a time, writes the contract and mockups on the contract pull request, and submits the expert's approval only after the expert confirms. Never writes code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-run guided setup for a fresh gAIOS clone. Interviews the user (identity, role, priorities, voice, connections, team, pain, guardrails) and fills the templates — CLAUDE.md, context/, references/voice.md, connections.md — then introduces the WAT / wiki / workflows / experiments features. Trigger on "/setup", "set me up", "get started", "onboard me", or a fresh clone where CLAUDE.md still has {{placeholders}}.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for conducting Torres-style story-based interviews with the people whose experience you're researching, with bias mitigation and a JTBD lens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when real user interviews aren't possible (solo/hobby/dogfood projects) but persona work is still needed. Enforces epistemic discipline: adversarial spectrum, pre-committed stop conditions, speculation tagging. NOT a substitute for /mycelium:user-interview when real users are available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。