「medium」の検索結果

AI ศิลปินจิตรกร — concept, composition, color palette, series plan, exhibition proposal รองรับทุก medium

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the same scrape or task across many accounts at once - each in its own browser profile with its own fingerprint, cookies and exit IP - and read data from sites that need a session or that answer a plain HTTP scraper with a captcha while answering a real browser. One command per site returns JSON, so there are no selectors to write or repair: Amazon and Walmart search, Google and DuckDuckGo results, Reddit posts and comments, X timeline, Medium, Yelp, Indeed job listings, Hacker News, GitHub, PyPI, npm, plus exit-IP and fingerprint checks. Use for multi-account operations you are authorized to run, price and listing monitoring per region, SERP collection, logged-in data, and scrapers that keep breaking. Also for 'scrape amazon', 'google search results', 'reddit data', 'scrape logged in site', 'run task on many accounts', 'site blocks my scraper', 'scraping without selectors'. Node or Python.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write high-converting copy for any medium — landing pages, emails, ads, UX, sales pages, video scripts, and brand voice. Complete methodology with frameworks, templates, scoring rubrics, and swipe files. Use when writing or reviewing any user-facing text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic AI development workflow orchestrator. Manages task boards (.jonggrang/jonggrang-tasks.json), runs 16-phase pipelines (BUGFIX/SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE), installs lifecycle hooks for Claude Code and OpenCode, and coordinates five specialist roles (Lead/Developer/Reviewer/TestLead/Tester). Use when planning features, executing multi-step development workflows, or orchestrating AI coding agents. Run via npx jonggrang.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 8 (optional) — OWASP-aligned security review of pending code changes. Produces a prioritized findings report (Critical/High/Medium/Low) mapped to OWASP Top 10 and CWE IDs. Output at `docs/security/<slug>-<date>.md`. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation quality gate that reviews changes, fixes small issues (scout rule), creates tasks for medium issues, and generates analysis for large issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation quality gate that reviews changes, fixes small issues (scout rule), creates tasks for medium issues, and generates analysis for large issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight multi-agent research orchestration using one coordinator, three domain leads, and three lightweight research agents. Use for medium-size research, market scans, competitor comparisons, prior-art style exploration, report planning, and any task that benefits from parallel domain decomposition without running a full high-cost research lab.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, revising, or critiquing a chart, dashboard, or KPI display that makes a quantitative comparison someone will act on. Covers honest comparison and rendered checks; leave palette, marks, and library mechanics to the medium's own skill. Skip decorative graphics and diagrams with no data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures pfSense firewall rules, NAT policies, VPN tunnels, and traffic shaping to enforce network segmentation, control traffic flow, and protect internal network zones in enterprise and small-to-medium business environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

プロトタイプの媒体選択ガイド（判断軸）。この検証は Figma でやるべきか、コードで作るべきか、併用かを決める。proto-loop のステップ2、およびデザイン検討の入口で「Figmaとコードどっちでやる？」に迷ったら適用する。基準の核は「止まっている絵で判断できるなら Figma、動かさないと分からないならコード」。

Use when the user asks to "build programmatic SEO pages", "generate pages at scale", "rank on a high-authority third-party site", "borrow domain authority", "build a vs / alternative page", "do local SEO", "optimize a Google Business Profile", or "fix NAP" — one page-build router with four modes: programmatic (template × dataset systems), parasite (barnacle publishing on Medium/Reddit/LinkedIn/GitHub), comparison (vs / alternative pages in four formats), and local (GBP + NAP + citations + location pages), each with its own thin/duplicate, honesty, or reputation-abuse guardrail. Not for finding what to target — use keyword-research or content-gap-analysis; not for drafting one standalone article — use content-writer; not for scoring a page for publish — use content-quality-auditor. 程序化SEO/批量页面/寄生SEO/借势权重/对比页/vs页/替代页/本地SEO/谷歌商家档案/NAP一致性

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "keep the launch momentum going after launch week", "plan a changelog / release-notes cadence as GTM", or "is this update worth a relaunch"; produces a T+1→T+30 momentum plan — a launch-moment calendar (milestone / shipped-loop / badge moments only), announcement-tier routing (major = full-channel, medium = targeted, minor = changelog-only), a relaunch legitimacy call, spike-to-owned handoff briefs, and the next Tier-1 moment with launch-stacking spacing. Not for the 30-day content-reuse map or paid amplification execution — use content-amplifier; not for planning the next launch end to end — use launch-tier-planner. 抗第二周断崖/changelog-as-GTM/relaunch/下一发布时刻

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual-only orchestrator for medium-to-large software development. Turns a broad goal into PR-sized and operational nodes with verification gates, then coordinates approved execution across follow-up prompts. Activate only when the user explicitly invokes my-epic; once activated, keep orchestrating that epic for the rest of the session. Do NOT use for an uninvoked planning or implementation request, a single small bug fix, one obvious PR, pure code review, ordinary SDD work that fits in one spec/PR, or implementing an epic during the same first call that created it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures pfSense firewall rules, NAT policies, VPN tunnels, and traffic shaping to enforce network segmentation, control traffic flow, and protect internal network zones in enterprise and small-to-medium business environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a medium or large coding project from a written spec, plan, or product goal where drift, skipped validation, PR correctness, or multi-block delivery risk matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable insights from blog posts, web articles, and practitioner content - assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or apply to the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from an article, extract insights from a blog post, apply a practitioner's findings, or process engineering blog content. Also triggers on "learn from this article", "learn from this blog post", "extract insights from this post", "what can we learn from this article", "apply this article", or when the user links to a blog, Medium, Substack, dev.to, or engineering blog post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about towing + recovery operations — separate FMCSA authority class, light-duty vs medium-duty vs heavy-duty wrecker rules, AAA + AAA-Plus contracts, Roadside-Assistance (RA) operations, "non-consensual tow" rules + state-by-state, and how towing operations differ from general freight. Reference state Public Utility Commission + 49 CFR 395 application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

上层编排 Skill，通过 **Brave Search 发现 → 智能选择浏览器截图** 完成结构化素材采集。 文章素材收集编排Skill。为MediaClaw内容生产提供结构化的多平台素材采集workflow。 强制使用OpenClaw Browser截图实际文章页面，支持GitHub/Reddit/X/Medium/知乎等。 用法: (1) content-ops-toolkit素材阶段调用 (2) daily-*-content素材采集 (3) 独立素材收集任务。 Trigger: "收集素材", "素材收集", "采集素材", "素材", "找素材", "research materials", "material collect". Author: Daniel Li version: 2.1.0 dependencies: [brave-search, web-content-capture]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。