「mining」の検索結果

Surface beliefs, assumptions, stories, and values shaping a system. Use when deeper mental models need examining with care and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data-driven resource harvesting (mining, logging, foraging) for Godot 4: apply_hit tool/tier validation via HarvestToolData enums, HarvestResourceData yields, harvestable_node shake/deplete, respawn_manager world persistence, UNIX offline progress, autosave, and noise vein proc-gen. Trigger keywords: apply_hit, HarvestResourceData, HarvestToolData, offline UNIX, respawn_manager, tool tier, harvestable_node, FastNoiseLite veins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The BloodGen3Module package provides functions for R user performing module repertoire analyses and generating fingerprint representations. Functions can perform group comparison or individual sample analysis and visualization by fingerprint grid plot or fingerprint heatmap. Module repertoire analyses typically involve determining the percentage of the constitutive genes for each module that are significantly increased or decreased. As we describe in details;https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

algorithm for determining cluster count and membership by stability evidence in unsupervised analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

思维挖掘助手 - 通过对话帮助用户把脑子里的零散想法倒出来、记录下来、整理成文章。覆盖从思维挖掘到成稿的完整流程。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expand a hard-to-build niche list from ~10 known-good seed companies into a full qualified TAM. Seed fingerprinting (how do good-fit companies ACTUALLY show up in the company database's filters) → lookalike generation (Prospeo company_lookalike, Exa findSimilar, Parallel.ai entity search) → filter mining with a precision/volume scorecard → wide pull with auto-sharding → cheap-AI qualification → live-website verification → client transparency report. Use when a vertical list feels "too small" (medical groups, hedge funds, Medicare brokerages), when known good-fit companies don't show up in keyword searches, or when someone says "expand this list", "the TAM should be bigger", "find more companies like these".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Eric Ries's Lean Startup methodology for building products under extreme uncertainty. Use when iterating toward product/market fit, designing MVPs, deciding whether to pivot or persevere, setting up actionable metrics, or accelerating the Build-Measure-Learn loop. Triggers include 'how do we test this idea fast', 'what should our MVP look like', 'our metrics look good but we're not growing', 'should we pivot', 'we're building features no one uses', 'how do we measure validated learning', 'vanity metrics vs real metrics', 'how to do innovation accounting'. NOT for companies with proven product/market fit scaling a known playbook (use Crossing the Chasm), not for determining Market Type (use Four Steps), not for sales methodology (use SPIN Selling), not for pricing strategy (use Monetizing Innovation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IATA cabin codes (F/J/W/Y) and saver fare class codes (X/I/O) for reading award inventory and determining partner-bookable availability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route viral topic discovery across platform-specific account-growth skills. Use when the user asks for 起号选题, low-follower viral references, recent viral content, cross-platform topic mining, or does not specify whether to search WeChat, X, Bilibili, or YouTube.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect Amazon.com written product reviews at scale through Woot's public review AJAX route, retain every attempt and error log, reconcile partial runs, and normalize exact review text into auditable JSONL. Use for VOC, competitor review mining, low-star complaint analysis, listing research, or batch ASIN review acquisition without Amazon credentials. Amazon data layer of the bggg VOC suite (shared project folder; orchestrated by industry-orchestrator, reported by bggg-voc-report).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull request lifecycle: commit, codex review, sync, review, fix, status, cleanup, and PR mining. Use when user wants to commit changes, get a second-opinion code review from Codex, push changes, create a PR, check PR status, fix review comments, clean up branches after merge, or mine tribal knowledge from PR reviews. Use for "commit my changes", "codex review", "push my changes", "create a PR", "pr status", "fix PR comments", "clean up branches", "mine PRs", or "address feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate blog topic ideas: problem mining, gap analysis, expansion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repository changes, branch differences, and commit history. Use when analyzing branches, comparing changes, examining commit history, or preparing for PR/commit operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured competitive analysis with feature matrices, SWOT, positioning maps, and UX review. Covers research frameworks, pricing comparison, review mining, and visual deliverables. Use for: market research, competitive intelligence, investor decks, product strategy, sales enablement. Triggers: competitor analysis, competitive analysis, competitor teardown, market research, competitive intelligence, swot analysis, competitor comparison, market landscape, competitor review, competitive landscape, feature comparison, market positioning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: explaining current FAR, DFARS, or agency-supplement text; determining documented acquisition-policy status for an agency and FAR part; comparing codified text, RFO model text, and agency deviations; tracing acquisition rulemaking; finding procurement comment periods; analyzing public comments; refreshing prior policy analysis; or producing an Acquisition Policy Impact Brief. Use published federal sources and supplied policy documents without making legal or procurement-specific applicability determinations. Do not use for clause selection, market research execution, opportunities, pricing, grants, or cooperative agreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to research customer pain points, complaints, or sentiment using review platforms like Trustpilot, G2, Capterra, or app stores. Also use when the user mentions "what are users saying", "competitor reviews", "pain points", or "voice of customer research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route AlphaGPT data ingestion, factor mining, live strategy, and dashboard workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exposed-secrets hunting - .git/ dir + history mining, exposed .env/config files, hardcoded keys in JS bundles + source maps, S3/blob exposure, public-repo secret search, CI/CD leakage. Live-validation mandatory. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the GDPR Article 56 one-stop-shop mechanism for determining lead supervisory authority in cross-border processing. Covers main establishment identification and cooperation. Activate when processing across EU borders. Keywords: one-stop-shop, Article 56, lead authority, cross-border.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Daphne Koller (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera, founder and CEO of Insitro). Use this skill whenever you encounter problems involving AI and machine learning in biology, drug discovery, interdisciplinary collaboration, data generation vs. data mining, or transitioning from academia to industry. Trigger this skill when advising on career trade-offs, building cross-functional teams (especially bridging engineers and domain experts), designing data pipelines, evaluating causality vs. correlation, or applying AI to physical systems ('where bits meet atoms'). Channel her focus on fit-for-purpose data, pragmatism, and disproportionate leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies bug-introducing commits using SZZ-style analysis based on bug-fixing commits, commit history, and code blame information. Use this skill when you need to trace bugs back to their origin, identify which commits introduced bugs, analyze bug-fix commits to find root causes, perform software repository mining for bug analysis, or conduct empirical studies on software defects. Triggers when users ask to find bug-introducing commits, identify when a bug was introduced, trace bug origins, perform SZZ analysis, or analyze bug-fixing commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。