「oop」の検索結果

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capstone/orchestration skill — build an M-Agent + N-Human cooperative IDE in Rust gpui (the Harbor): many agents and humans co-editing the same files as co-equal CRDT replicas, governed by claims/guard/salvage, across LAN/shared/remote harbors. The INDEX that dispatches into the sibling rust skills. Use when building the collaborative editor, the agent-fleet console, multiplayer editing with agents-as-peers, or any slice of the Harbor. Trigger on: cooperative IDE, collaborative editor, multiplayer editor, agents and humans co-editing, gpui IDE, Loro CRDT editor, harbor editor, claims/salvage, "build the cooperative IDE". NOT for: a single non-collaborative gpui screen (compose the siblings directly), web editors, or non-editor apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

他の開発者のGitHub PRを下読みしてレビューコメント案を作り、人間が承認した内容だけを保留(PENDING)レビュー経由で投稿する。自作PRの修正ループには codex-pr-review-loop / claude-pr-review-loop を使う。

Autonomous build-verify-fix loop that runs until an explicit Definition of Done passes. Use when named (mini-loop) or when the user says exactly "run a loop".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when acting as the orchestrator agent that drives Syntropic137 - running the dogfood loop, deciding what to dispatch next, landing agent PRs, deploying a beta, triaging failed executions, or keeping the scratchpad, paper cuts and retrospectives current. Trigger phrases include "orchestrator tick", "keep the loop running", "what should we dispatch next", "land these PRs", "why are PRs stacking up", "deploy the next beta", "pit stop", "the run failed, what now", "write the retro", "is the system helping", "scale quality", "learning loop for the orchestrator". Do NOT use for deciding whether one task belongs in a workspace or locally (see `dogfooding`), for turning one incident into an eval case (see `learning-loop`), for designing a workflow A/B experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`), or for release-branch and version-bump mechanics (see `devops`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Hi-C analysis workflow from FASTQ to compartments, TADs, and loops, with the decision of WHICH features the sequencing depth can support. Covers pairtools read-pair processing and library QC, cooler matrices, ICE balancing and distance-decay expected, A/B compartments, TAD boundaries, loop calling, and the routing of HiChIP/PLAC-seq/Capture Hi-C to protein-directed loop callers. Use when processing Hi-C data end to end, deciding a resolution for a given depth, or choosing between bulk-Hi-C and protein-directed loop calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

review-all を実行し、指摘内容をコードに反映、bun run c / bun run lint / bun test で自己検証し、CONVERGED/NOT_CONVERGED の収束判定付き完了レポートを /tmp/arima-review-fix-result.md に出力する。レビュー→修正→検証→レポートを一気通貫で行うスキル。スコープ引数は /review-all と同じ（wt / PR #N / vs:<branch> / range / ファイル列挙）。review-fix-loop からの自動呼び出し（mode=non-interactive）にも対応。Use when user says 'レビューして直して', 'review and fix', '自動修正', 'レビュー反映', or when invoked by review-fix-loop.

Operating guide for the durable Autonomous Work Loop task fleet. Use when adding work to, coordinating, or working an Autonomous Work Loop campaign, or when calling the work_loop MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the daytime maintainer loop for NemoClaw, prioritizing items labeled with the current version target. Picks the highest-value item, executes the right workflow (merge gate, salvage, security sweep, test gaps, hotspot cooling, or sequencing), and reports progress. Use during the workday to land PRs and close issues. Designed for /loop (e.g. /loop 10m /nemoclaw-maintainer-day). Trigger keywords - maintainer day, work on PRs, land PRs, make progress, what's next, keep going, maintainer loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded, governed iteration — "loop", "iterate until", "keep going until", "sweep", "ratchet", "until it passes", "coverage to 100". Turns an open-ended autonomous run into a finite loop with checkpoints and explicit stopping conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one Terminal-Bench task through a bounded Paperclip smoke/diagnosis/fix loop. Use when asked to drive Terminal-Bench until it passes, rerun a Terminal-Bench loop, or iterate with board-gated fixes and diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full PR lifecycle in a fresh task-owned git worktree: implement via the ulw-loop skill with mandatory evidence-bound manual QA → reviewer-readable English PR → verification loop (CI + Cubic, where Cubic is skipped only when its quota is exhausted) → merge by default → worktree cleanup. Decomposes one task into the smallest atomic, independently-mergeable PRs and builds the independent ones concurrently via one worktree per PR driven by parallel subagents or a team. Unbounded loop: any failing gate sends you back to fix-and-re-QA inside that PR's worktree. Use whenever implementation work needs to land as a PR. Triggers: 'create a PR', 'implement and PR', 'work on this and make a PR', 'implement issue', 'land this as a PR', 'split into atomic PRs', 'parallel PRs', 'work-with-pr', 'PR workflow', 'implement end to end', even when user just says 'implement X' if the context implies PR delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and operate the Gmail/Calendar/Contacts connector and the open-loop engine: who is waiting on the user, what they promised, and the context needed to respond. Covers painless BYO OAuth setup (exactly two user interactions), the daily `gbrain waiting` digest, loop closing/muting, and troubleshooting via the typed error catalog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coordinating product work across the 12 bundled product sub-skills (RICE, OKRs, UX research, design tokens, competitive teardown, analytics, experiments, discovery, roadmaps, spec-to-repo, landing pages, SaaS scaffolding) or the 4 standalone product-team plugins (user stories, Apple HIG, code-to-PRD, research summarizer). Triggers on 'help me prioritize', 'plan a product experiment', 'we ship features nobody uses', 'run the discovery loop', 'is our OST sound'. Forks context to route to one sub-skill via a deterministic signal router and returns a digest; can also drive a continuous-discovery loop (Torres cadence tracker + OST linter as machine gates) or a full goal→plan→execute→verify→close run through the repo-wide agent-harness. Distinct from project-management (how to deliver vs what to build), marketing/landing (from-scratch pages), and engineering/agent-harness (the generic loop engine this orchestrator plugs into).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coordinating project-delivery work across the 8 project-management sub-skills — sprint/velocity analytics, portfolio health, Jira/JQL, Confluence, Atlassian admin, templates, meeting analysis, team comms. Triggers on 'our sprints feel off', 'project health report', 'audit our Jira permissions', 'when will it be done', 'run the delivery loop'. Forks context to route to one sub-skill via a deterministic signal router and returns a digest; can also drive a full goal→plan→execute→verify→close delivery loop through the repo-wide agent-harness with Jira MCP data bridged into the domain's analytics tools. Distinct from product-team (what to build vs how to deliver it), business-operations (internal ops), and engineering/agent-harness (the generic loop engine this orchestrator plugs into).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PUA Loop — guided iterative development with recurring checks, completion evidence, and pause/abort markers. Use only when the user explicitly asks for loop/自动迭代 mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative improvement loop — refine a target across multiple Algorithm cycles toward ideal state. USE WHEN loop, iterate, refine, multiple passes, keep improving, revisit, rework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structural analysis of complex systems — Iceberg model, Causal Loop feedback diagrams, archetype matching, Meadows leverage points, and concept maps — grounded in the premise that behavior is generated by structure. USE WHEN systems thinking, causal loop, feedback loops, archetypes, leverage points, iceberg model, fix the system, why does this keep happening, recurring problem, second-order effects. NOT FOR incident causal chains (use RootCauseAnalysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。