「ownership」の検索結果

Use this skill to track institutional investor ownership changes and portfolio flows using 13F filings data. Analyzes hedge funds, mutual funds, and other institutional holders to identify stocks with significant smart money accumulation or distribution. Helps discover stocks before major moves by following where sophisticated investors are deploying capital.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "remember project context", review saved findings, initialize runtime memory, archive stale work, reconcile notes, or erase a subject; manages authorized HOT/WARM/COLD working memory across all disciplines while preserving registry event ownership and privacy controls. Not for changing canonical registry facts - route those through the owning registry. 项目记忆/跨会话

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build alignment artifacts — responsibility matrices, decision rights, and communication plans. Use when unclear ownership stalls decisions. For persuading in the moment, use `design-negotiation` (designer-toolkit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write interface copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, and CTAs. Use when the words are the deliverable. For content structure and ownership, use `content-strategy` (ux-strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a production Attio integration architecture with tenant-bound credentials, schema discovery, queued writes, verified webhooks, idempotency, reconciliation, and rollback ownership. Use when planning or reviewing a multi-workspace Attio service. Trigger with "Attio architecture", "design Attio integration", or "Attio system design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an evidence-based production-readiness review for an Attio integration across identity, scopes, data ownership, retries, webhooks, observability, rollback, and support. Use when preparing to enable production Attio traffic. Trigger with "Attio production checklist", "Attio go-live", or "review Attio release".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an NFT discovery workflow with Alchemy NFT API v3 and isolate typed on-chain reads through viem. Use when creating collection explorers or ownership checks. Trigger with "Alchemy NFT API", "NFT collection explorer", or "read an NFT contract".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish Abridge tenant access, identity ownership, and approved EHR integration prerequisites without fabricating public credentials or endpoints. Use when onboarding an Abridge implementation. Trigger with "configure Abridge access".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose among direct service integration, Adobe App Builder, and a dedicated queued worker using evidence about ownership, latency, scale, storage, events, and operations. Use when the task requires adobe architecture variant decision. Trigger with "choose Adobe architecture", "App Builder or microservice", or "Adobe design options".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace a codexhost feature change across UI surfaces, Host routing, Harness capabilities, state ownership, persistence, and validation. Use for impact analysis, design planning, or implementation handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply codexhost package and native ownership rules when changing production code or dependency directions. Inspect public contracts and run the existing boundary check; skip documentation-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rust systems programming patterns including ownership, traits, async runtime, error handling, and unsafe guidelines

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize business and technology teams for fast flow using Skelton & Pais's "Team Topologies". Use when the user mentions "team topologies", "Conway's law", "platform team", "stream-aligned team", "team boundaries", "cognitive load", "how should we split teams", "who owns this service", "team dependencies", or "reorg". Also trigger when reorganizing engineering teams, aligning team and service boundaries, splitting a monolith and deciding ownership, reducing cross-team handoffs, or designing an internal platform. Covers the four team types, three interaction modes, the inverse Conway maneuver, and fracture planes. For bounded contexts, see domain-driven-design. For dependency direction in code, see clean-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply meta-principles of software craftsmanship: DRY, orthogonality, tracer bullets, and design by contract. Use when the user mentions "best practices", "pragmatic approach", "broken windows", "tracer bullet", "software craftsmanship", "avoid technical debt", "code ownership", or "how do I become a better developer". Also trigger when evaluating build-vs-buy decisions, designing estimation approaches, or choosing between reversible and irreversible architectural decisions. Covers estimation, domain languages, and reversibility. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run complete OpenClaw Windows Node issue and PR triage, including landing queues, proof pools, ownership audits, and release planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs how an organization is structured — reporting lines, team boundaries, spans and layers, role definition, and workforce planning against the strategy. Use this to structure a new team, restructure an existing one, resolve unclear ownership between teams, plan headcount, or diagnose why a team underperforms for structural rather than individual reasons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks hardware and software assets through their life — procurement, ownership, licensing, refresh, and disposal. Use this to build an asset register, prepare for a software audit, plan a refresh cycle, control license spend, or dispose of equipment safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating a business through Buffett-style ownership, owner earnings, durable moat, management quality, capital allocation, and margin-of-safety judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating Li Lu-style value investments: circle of competence, long-term compounding, deep research, conservative downside, China/global quality businesses, and concentrated ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating Chris Hohn / TCI-style concentrated quality investing: exceptional businesses, pricing power, high returns on capital, engagement, and long-duration concentrated ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating crypto networks through a Placeholder-style lens: open networks, token investment frameworks, network participation, and long-duration crypto network ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。