7,427 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Automated Planning utilities for loading PDDL domains and problems, generating plans using classical planners, validating plans, and saving plan outputs. Supports standard PDDL parsing, plan synthesis, and correctness verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Planning phase guidance for creating and reconciling feature task plans. Use when the user wants to create an implementation plan, update planning docs, mark task progress, capture blockers or new tasks, or run dev-lifecycle planning work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CloudBase declarative deployment from a cloudbaserc config (声明式部署, 配置式部署, cloudbaserc 部署) through the deployBuild / deployPlan / deployApply MCP tools. Use when deploying database, functions, app, hosting, or gateway resources described in cloudbaserc.json/yaml as a single desired-state config, when a user wants to build static hosting artifacts locally first (deployBuild), or wants a dry-run plan before applying (deployPlan), or when handling multi-environment deploys via mode / envOverrides. Covers build-plan-apply flow (deployBuild local build → deployPlan dry-run → deployApply confirm=true), hosting build-output neutralization, envId resolution priority, only/skip filtering, concurrency, and continueOnError. Prefer deployBuild (when hosting declares a buildCommand) and deployPlan before deployApply; do not confuse with per-resource tcb CLI deploy or single-function deploy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dung khi ket thuc mot ky va can lap plan quang cao ky sau tu data that — giu winner, thay loser, gia thuyet test moi, va ngan sach theo 3 kich ban. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'next ads plan', 'plan ads thang sau', 'ky toi chay gi', 'dua vao ket qua lap ke hoach ads', 'ads thang toi'. Khong dung cho — lap media plan lan dau khi chua co data thi dung skill 54-media-plan; chan doan tai sao ky vua roi kem thi dung skill 21-audit-ads-performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs an overall marketing plan for a period — objectives, segments, positioning, channel mix, content direction, budget, timeline, KPIs, and a risk matrix, adapted to US, EU, SEA, or LATAM. Trigger on 'marketing plan', 'marketing strategy for next year', 'go-to-market roadmap', 'plan for Q3', 'we have no marketing plan', 'where should we spend next quarter'. Also use when a founder only says the business needs to grow and has no idea which channel to start with. Not for — one specific campaign, see `02-campaign-brief-global`; working backward from a revenue goal to spend, see `10-reverse-kpi-global`; splitting a budget across channels and months, see `61-budget-planning-global`; taking a brand new product to market, see `59-go-to-market-global`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a lesson plan, student-facing materials, and observation template. Load this skill BEFORE asking the teacher any clarifying question about grade, subject, topic, standard, or timing. Use when a K-12 teacher needs a math, ELA, science, or social studies lesson built from scratch — even if grade, subject, or topic isn't yet stated. Do NOT load for grading, a rubric, assessment feedback, a quiz, or a standards lookup — answer those directly. Triggers on explicit requests (lesson plan, mini-lesson, unit plan, daily plan) and implicit teacher intent: "I'm teaching long division to 5th graders," "need to teach photosynthesis tomorrow." Core signal: teacher needs new instructional content created. A new lesson that asks for differentiated, tiered, or leveled materials is still ONE planning request — this skill produces those materials inside the lesson package; do not also invoke k12-lesson-differentiation. Not for differentiating an existing lesson (use k12-lesson-differentiation) or passage rewrites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects stale project plans and suggests session commands. Triggers on: sync plan, update plan, check status, plan is stale, track progress, project planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants feedback on a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plans/<slug>.md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to "create a test plan", "plan tests", "what should I test", "generate test scenarios", "test plan for this PR", or "what are the test cases".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively review and revise a plan until no new findings survive evaluation. Use when the user asks to "refine the plan", "iterate on the plan", "tighten the plan", or "improve the plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your business planner. Compiles everything the other founder skills wrote (the board's verdict, the competitors, the buyer panel, pricing, the offer, the CFO's numbers, marketing, brand, operations and the launch plan) into one business plan with a verdict at the top that is computed from the numbers, never written by hand: Profitable, Not yet (with the failing numbers) or Incomplete. Adds an executive summary and a one-page version for a partner, lender or investor. Use when the user says "write my business plan", "put it all together", "is it profitable", "give me the plan", or at the end of the founder pack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage OpenViking collections (OV libraries) from the command line with `ov-cp` — list / create / get / update / usage / get the data-plane API key / delete, plus managing the users and account data spaces of an enterprise-tier library (list / create / register / update / delete), account-scoped users / API keys / usage, and configuring how a library is billed (AgentPlan AFP deduction vs Volcano pay-as-you-go, `--pay-type` / `--seat-id`). Use when the user wants to provision or inspect an OpenViking library, fetch a library's data-plane API key, do the create→get-key cold-start, manage a library's users or accounts / 数据空间, set or switch a library's billing, or otherwise drive the OpenViking control plane (topapi). Authenticates with an Ark AgentPlan ApiKey.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not plan a restructure of code that already exists — use plan-a-change. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research. Does not map the bounded contexts of existing code — use ddd-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse weekly review for turning inbox noise, daily plans, diaries, calendars, annual plans, and long-range life plans into one happiness-and-peace-centered weekly plan. Use when the user asks for 週檢視, 反向週計劃, 8 Big Rocks, Inbox Zero weekly review, 幸福寧靜週, or wants to synthesize Todoist/inbox notes, daily diaries, calendars, yearly plans, and life plans into iMandalArt/FIRE/JSON outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"/blueprint", "blueprint", "task graph", "contract derivation", "execution plan", "plan tasks from requirements", "contract-first planning" Turn requirements.md into an executable blueprint (plan.json + contracts.md). Five phases: Contracts → Tasks → Journeys → Verify Plan → Commit. Sits between /specify and /execute. Scope-adaptive (greenfield → bugfix). Uses hoyeon-cli (plan.json only; requirements.md is read as-is via Read tool).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated Planning utilities for loading PDDL domains and problems, generating plans using classical planners, validating plans, and saving plan outputs. Supports standard PDDL parsing, plan synthesis, and correctness verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as a project-management copilot (PM/PMO) for the delivery loop: charters, plans and schedules, estimates, risk registers, status reports, scope changes, stakeholder communication, meeting actions, lessons learned, and portfolio roll-ups, in a per-project `_project/` workspace. Use whenever the user wants to start, plan, track, rescue, or report on a project: "kick off this project", "make a project plan / timeline / WBS", "what date can I commit to", "build a risk register", "run a pre-mortem", "write the weekly status report", "the deadline slipped, what now", "turn this meeting into action items", "review my project portfolio", in any language ("quản lý dự án", "gestion de projet", "プロジェクト管理", "项目管理"), even when they never say "project management". Also use whenever a `_project/` directory exists and the user asks about schedule, deadline, risk, status, scope, budget, or stakeholders. Not for what to build (product-manager) or company-level bets (strategy-board).
Act as a product-manager copilot that turns evidence into product decisions and artifacts: backlogs and prioritization, PRDs and user stories, metrics and OKRs, experiments, launch plans, feedback triage, and pricing/packaging, kept in a per-product workspace. Use whenever the user wants to decide what to build, spec it, or ship it: "write a PRD for…", "prioritize our backlog", "what should we build next", "plan OKRs", "define our north star metric", "design an A/B test", "plan the launch", "triage this customer feedback", "platform or feature?", in any language ("viết PRD", "ưu tiên tính năng nào", "quản lý sản phẩm", "プロダクト管理", "产品经理"), even when they never say "product manager". Also use when the user returns to a product workspace this skill created (a directory holding `product.md`, `state.md`, and `decisions.md`). Not for deep user discovery (design-thinking), desk market facts (market-researcher), or company-level bets (strategy-board).
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan chunks", "break this down", "plan the implementation", or when a story has status planning and needs implementation details before building. Required before any story can be implemented. Transforms story sparks into detailed chunk-by-chunk implementation plans with full technical specifics, file lists, and risk analysis. Supports parallel planning of multiple stories via batch mode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。