「proposal」の検索結果

Make the user defend a proposal they committed to. Use when a proposal is committed but its decisions are undefended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven development workflow. Interactive phase-by-phase confirmation from proposal to implementation. Trigger: 'spec-flow', 'spec mode', 'need a plan', 'structured development', 'write a spec', 'feature spec', 'technical spec', '需求文档', '技术方案', '任务拆解', '规格驱动', '写个方案', '做个规划', '结构化开发', 'plan this feature', 'break this down', 'design doc'. Creates .spec-flow/ directory with proposal, requirements, design, and tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

제안서 디자인 에이전트. 승인된 proposal_script.md를 generate_제안서.py Python 코드로 변환합니다. slide_kit.py 함수 시그니처, VStack 레이아웃 계산, 7대 디자인 패턴, 겹침/넘침 방지, Dark-Light Rhythm을 적용합니다. 트리거: 디자인, 코드 생성, 레이아웃, VStack, slide_kit, 겹침, 넘침, COLS, GRID, FLOW, CHART, TABLE, HIGHLIGHT, KPIS, COMPARE, TIMELINE, PYRAMID, MATRIX, 그림자, 카드, Hero, Bento, Comparison

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

매핑 에디터. proposal_script.md와 generate_제안서.py 간의 매핑을 검증하고 수정합니다. 스크립트의 레이아웃 지시가 코드에 올바르게 반영되었는지 확인. 트리거: /mapping-editor, 매핑 검증, 스크립트-코드 매핑

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

제안서 스크립트 에디터 v2.0. proposal_script.md를 3가지 뷰(Overview/Strategy/Slide List)로 분석하고 편집합니다. 전체 구성·목차·흐름을 한눈에 파악하고, 전략 품질을 진단합니다. 트리거: /script-editor, 스크립트 수정, 스크립트 편집, 스크립트 분석, 구조 확인, 전략 분석

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project needs an experiment proposal from a weak or bounded project claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage the Gaia issue backlog and skill-batch intake queue. Use this skill when someone asks to: "triage issues", "clean up the issue tracker", "review the backlog", "close stale issues", "process the intake queue", "review skill-batches", "evaluate draft skill proposals", "approve or reject pending skills", "is this issue still valid?", "what's clogging the backlog?", "run a triage pass", or /gaia-triage. Covers two workstreams: (1) GitHub issue lifecycle — identifying resolved, stale, or need-more-info issues and acting on them via gh CLI; (2) skill-batch intake — evaluating draft proposals in registry-for-review/skill-batches/ and routing them toward promotion or rejection. This is the gatekeeping step before new skills enter the canonical registry; and (3) a cross-repo triage sweep — sizing, P0-P4 prioritization, umbrella/epic synthesis, and assignment across every gaia-research org repo, on the one headquarters tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage and classify pending Gaia skill intake batches in registry-for-review/. Use for gaia push intake proposals, draft skill batches, and deciding whether proposals should proceed to canonical curation. This skill is read-only and never promotes skills itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage architecture RFCs: create, review, list, update, and transition status. Use when user mentions "RFC", "technical proposal", "architecture proposal", or wants to draft, review, list, update, or change status of RFCs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a grant management system for proposal workflow efficiency, deadline tracking, budget-narrative alignment, outcome reporting, compliance readiness, and win rate optimization. Use when reviewing nonprofit grant software, building a grants CRM, analyzing proposal pipelines, or evaluating funder reporting tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exhaustion (5 architectural iterations).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Better Proposals tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/brainstorm のユーザーストーリー品質を INVEST 基準で軽量チェックする。proposal.md 生成前にストーリーの構造的品質を確認し、問題があれば対話で改善を促す

Create and publish a recurring client-facing deliverable — SEO or analytics monthly, project status report, audit results — as a branded live page with view tracking. Use when the user says "client report", "monthly report for", "status update for the client", "send this to my client". Not for one-off research shares (use report-publisher) or proposals (use proposal-tracker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn research, analysis, or any markdown the agent just produced into a live, beautifully designed web report with a shareable tracked URL via ReportRoom. Use when the user says "publish this", "make this shareable", "turn this into a report", "put this on a page", or wants findings to live beyond the chat. Not for recurring client deliverables (use client-reporter), slide decks (use deck-publisher), or proposals that need view alerts (use proposal-tracker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the close of an epic (or a difficult issue), post a postmortem roundup comment — what went well, what was hard (backed by evidence), and 1–3 concrete proposals to improve the skills/flows — then offer to turn accepted proposals into their own `workflow`-labeled tasks, and end with a `🔭 Next` handoff (a paste-ready next-session prompt + the next epic to start). Use at epic close, after the "verify the whole thing" rollup, or when asked to "do a retro", "postmortem this epic", "what did we learn", "how do we improve the workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

戦略企画の専門スキル。中期経営計画、新規事業企画、事業ポートフォリオ分析を支援。 SWOT/PEST/Porter 5F分析、ビジネスモデルキャンバス、BCG/GE/Ansoffマトリクスなど MBA標準の戦略フレームワークを活用した体系的な戦略立案を行う。 Use when creating strategic plans, business proposals, portfolio analysis, or when applying strategic frameworks like SWOT, PEST, Porter's Five Forces, BCG Matrix. Triggers include「中期経営計画」「戦略企画」「事業ポートフォリオ」「SWOT分析」 「新規事業企画」「ビジネスモデル」「競争戦略」「成長戦略」