806 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence. Agent-autonomous for facts and for actions covered by standing authorization; signed for every new judgment. Never merges.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a codebase and recommend Claude Code automations (hooks, subagents, skills, plugins, MCP servers). Use when user asks for automation recommendations, wants to optimize their Claude Code setup, mentions improving Claude Code workflows, asks how to first set up Claude Code for a project, or wants to know what Claude Code features they should use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional financial research report generation — standard structure (summary / views / main body / risks / recommendation), Markdown formatting standards, rating system, and terminology guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect unauthorized SaaS and cloud service usage (shadow IT) by parsing proxy access logs, DNS query logs, and firewall/netflow data with Python pandas to aggregate traffic by domain, classify domains against known SaaS categories, and score risk by data volume and user count. Use when auditing an organization for unsanctioned cloud/SaaS usage or generating a shadow IT discovery report with remediation recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a book, article, transcript, or case study through the lens of a specific strategic problem you're facing. Produces an applied playbook that maps the source onto the problem and gives short/medium/long-term recommendations. NOT for general book summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Token-hygiene audit of the always-loaded context stack — CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, auto-memory MEMORY.md, and the bootstrap-rendered identity files (SOUL.md, USER.md, ACCESS_POLICY.md, HEARTBEAT.md) or their harness equivalents. Finds redundancy, contradictions, stale content, compression candidates, and skill-extraction candidates; produces a ranked action list sorted by token savings with a risk class per finding. REPORT-ONLY: this skill never edits any audited file. Recommendations for bootstrap-rendered files target the interview answer bank / templates, never the rendered output. Judging routes through `gbrain eval cross-modal` (single cheap model by default; full multi-model panel is explicit opt-in).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a Zoom integration idea into an implementation plan with architecture, auth, and delivery milestones. Use when you need a practical build plan, phased delivery sequence, risk list, and next-step recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The front door to the Small Business plugin. Listens to what the owner needs right now — vague or specific — and routes them to the best skill or slash command for the moment. Also serves as a guide: explains what's available, suggests what to try next, and adapts recommendations based on stored business context. Trigger whenever the owner asks "what can you do," "help me with my business," "what should I focus on," "I don't know where to start," or any open-ended business request that doesn't clearly match a single skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a marketing performance report with key metrics, trend analysis, wins and misses, and prioritized optimization recommendations. Use when wrapping a campaign, when preparing weekly, monthly, or quarterly channel summaries for stakeholders, or when you need data translated into an executive summary with next-period priorities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user research from interviews, surveys, and feedback into structured insights. Use when you have a pile of interview notes, survey responses, or support tickets to make sense of, need to extract themes and rank findings by frequency and impact, or want to turn raw feedback into roadmap recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft blog posts, social media, email newsletters, landing pages, press releases, and case studies with channel-specific formatting and SEO recommendations. Use when writing any marketing content, when you need headline or subject line options, or when adapting a message for a specific platform, audience, and brand voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user research into themes, insights, and recommendations. Use when you have interview transcripts, survey results, usability test notes, support tickets, or NPS responses that need to be distilled into patterns, user segments, and prioritized next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Memory health dashboard showing line counts, topic files, capacity, stale entries, and recommendations. Use when the user runs /si:memory-status or asks how full or healthy the agent memory is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mentor for embedded and IoT hardware projects. Helps select MCUs, dev boards, and toolchains, decides where sensor readings end up (phone, PC, dashboard, or alert), and gives time/cost estimates and a phased build plan from breadboard MVP to production PCB. Use when the user mentions embedded, IoT, microcontroller, ESP32, STM32, Arduino, Raspberry Pi Pico, firmware, PCB, KiCad, EasyEDA, PlatformIO, MQTT, Home Assistant, ESPHome, Grafana, an IoT dashboard, seeing sensor data on a phone, or asks for hardware tool recommendations, project planning, or cost/time estimates for an electronics project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs. partner-led channel economics — computing fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI with cash / LTV / marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to constraints. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, and VP Sales doing quarterly channel review when pipeline is mixed (e.g., 60% direct + 40% partner-led) and nobody actually knows which channel makes money after CAC, support load, partner discount, deal-velocity differences, retention differential, and overhead allocation are all loaded in. Outputs cost to serve, channel ROI verdicts (DOUBLE-DOWN / MAINTAIN / DEFUND / EXIT), a sensitivity-tested channel-mix recommendation, and the diminishing-returns inflection (e.g., 'which channel actually makes money — direct or partner?').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running an annual SaaS audit, doing category-level spend review, or rationalizing the supplier base — when the user needs a spend audit, spend categorization (UNSPSC-aligned with Pareto breakdown and industry profiles), purchasing-cycle analysis (bottleneck categories per Goldratt's Theory of Constraints), or risk-balanced supplier consolidation that refuses single-source recommendations for tier-1 categories without a documented break-glass plan. Triggers on "spend audit", "SaaS audit", "spend categorization", "supplier rationalization", "supplier consolidation", "category strategy", "duplicate SaaS", "renewal cluster".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success. Use when analyzing customer accounts, reviewing retention metrics, scoring at-risk customers, or when the user mentions churn, customer health scores, upsell opportunities, expansion revenue, retention analysis, or customer analytics. Runs three Python CLI tools to produce deterministic health scores, churn risk tiers, and prioritized expansion recommendations across Enterprise, Mid-Market, and SMB segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。