「replay」の検索結果

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic debugging with rr record-replay. Use when debugging crashes, ASAN faults, or when reverse execution is needed. Provides reverse-next, reverse-step, reverse-continue commands and crash trace extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and validate an end-to-end Mission Control showcase with a locally installed Isaac Sim launched in its GUI window, driven through the isaac-sim-remote Python server, with Nova Carter SIL. Use for demos, showcase replays, Mission Control driving a simulated robot, or diagnosing the integrated small-warehouse scenario. Detect existing Isaac Sim installations without modifying them, automatically select a usable runtime without prompting whenever compatibility can be confirmed, and delegate requested installation or version changes to isaac-sim-installation. Defaults to a canonical Isaac 6.1 warehouse and deterministic circular route when the user does not specify another scenario.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the root-level workflow runtime policy or rule-based rollouts and verify simulator success. Use for evaluation, checkpoints, or local controllers; do not use for replay or dataset annotation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade or filter workflow HDF5 episodes with an OpenAI-compatible vision model. Use for visual success labels; do not use for replay, policy evaluation, or recordings without frames.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert workflow HDF5 recordings to LeRobot datasets for training or browser inspection. Use for conversion; do not use for replay, augmentation, or raw-data repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reactive streams and event-driven programming in Golang using samber/ro — ReactiveX implementation with 150+ type-safe operators, cold/hot observables, 5 subject types (Publish, Behavior, Replay, Async, Unicast), declarative pipelines via Pipe, 40+ plugins (HTTP, cron, fsnotify, JSON, logging), automatic backpressure, error propagation, and Go context integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/ro, when the codebase imports github.com/samber/ro, or when building asynchronous event-driven pipelines, real-time data processing, streams, or reactive architectures in Go. Not for finite slice transforms (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-lo` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface past learnings relevant to the current task before starting work. Searches correction history, recalls past mistakes, and applies prior patterns. Use when starting a task, saying "what do I know about", "previous mistakes", "lessons learned", or "remind me about".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, runs, debugs, and operates event-driven applications using EventBridge Event Bus - a managed, centrally governed publish/subscribe event bus that an organization can share across many teams and accounts. Applicable when workloads need event-driven architectures, decoupling, choreography, asynchronous integration, pub/sub, fan-out, event ordering, delivered in sequence, event router, event broker, event bus, event store, event retention, event replay, deduplication, avro, protobuf, cloudevents, uses events or messages. Designed as a centrally managed event bus platform allowing governance and control - such as subscriber control, revocation, per-account throttling - while giving application owners flexibility across an organization spanning multiple accounts, with end-to-end open-standards observability and cost allocation. Also helps reduce costs in high fan-out scenarios where multi-account forwarding adds cost. A serverless, managed alternative to self-managed event streaming platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on Amazon RDS open-source engines (MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL) for instance creation, upgrade planning, commitment pricing, proxy evaluation, and Blue/Green deployments. Handles any RDS MySQL, MariaDB, or PostgreSQL question, including create a production-ready RDS MySQL instance, provision an RDS PostgreSQL database, run the RDS upgrade advisor for my RDS MySQL instance, what are my upgrade options, upgrade RDS MariaDB from 10.6 to the latest version, should I buy reserved instances or a savings plan for db.r7g.2xlarge RDS MySQL, change a VARCHAR to INT column on RDS MySQL 8.0 with Blue/Green, and does RDS Proxy help when PgBouncer already runs in transaction mode. Covers instance creation with production best practices, describe-db-instances and describe-db-engine-versions upgrade-target workflow, live prechecks via SSM or direct connection, RI versus DSP commitment pricing, RDS Proxy versus PgBouncer, and Blue/Green lifecycle with binlog replay compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Adobe I/O Events registration, challenge validation, authentic delivery, idempotent enqueue, replay operations, and disablement recovery. Use when the task requires adobe i/o events authentic delivery. Trigger with "Adobe webhook", "Adobe I/O Events", or "verify Adobe event".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and verify callbacks only from an approved tenant-specific Abridge event contract, with replay and PHI protections. Use when vendor implementation documents authorize event delivery. Trigger with "build the Abridge event handler".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and design idempotency, bounded polling, per-service circuits, durable queues, DLQ/replay, degradation, and reconciliation for Adobe workloads. Use when the task requires adobe async reliability controls. Trigger with "Adobe reliability", "Firefly retry design", or "PDF job recovery".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smart contract vulnerability playbook. Use when auditing Solidity/EVM contracts for reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, delegatecall, flash loan, signature replay, and MEV-related attack patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure a Next.js app using posthog-js so session recording and dead-click capture survive browser ad blockers. Aliases the three blocker-flagged JS chunks (dead-clicks-autocapture.js, recorder.js, posthog-recorder.js) to bland same-origin paths via Next.js rewrites, and monkey-patches HTMLScriptElement so posthog-js requests the aliases. TRIGGER when posthog-js session replay or dead-click capture is failing in production with ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT or 404s on /static/dead-clicks-autocapture.js / /static/recorder.js / /static/posthog-recorder.js, or when the user wants to bypass ad blockers for these specific assets. Works alongside an existing PostHog reverse proxy (managed or otherwise) — only the three blocked files divert through Next.js, all other PostHog traffic stays on the original api_host. SKIP for unrelated PostHog setup, non-Next.js apps, or when capture/decide endpoints (/e/, /decide/, /array/*/config.js) are the ones being blocked — those need a different treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare and implement eviction policies (LRU, LFU, FIFO, S3FIFO, ARC) for bounded-capacity caches. Use when choosing or implementing an eviction policy for a buffer pool, page cache, CDN edge, or LLM KV cache, or when writing a replay simulator that supports multiple policies. Clarifies recency vs frequency semantics, queue topology, saturating counters, ghost buffers, and the second-chance rule that distinguishes modern FIFO-family policies from classic LRU.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and repair proposed resource allocations by replaying them against temporary capacity. Use when actions consume several resource dimensions such as CPU, memory, GPUs, or accelerators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement secure webhook verification — HMAC signature validation, replay attack prevention, idempotency keys, and webhook payload processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate BurpSuite MCP Bridge for professional, authorized web testing. Use when Codex needs to inspect Burp live/history/logger/selection traffic, prioritize one target, retrieve a decisive request/response, intercept and edit a request or response before forwarding, replay one controlled mutation, manage temporary rewrite rules, import BChecks/Bambdas, export evidence, or diagnose the Windows Burp to WSL MCP connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and simplify C# property-based, model-based, and executable specification tests with CsCheck. Use for generators, shrinking, stateful command sequences, Spec guards and rules, implementation conformance, or replaying generated failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Simulink model is incompatible with Simulink Design Verifier (sldvcompat returns false, or an SLDV analysis errors out on an unsupported construct) and needs to be made analyzable. Diagnoses the incompatibility, applies the matching fix to a copy, and confirms the copy is compatible; optionally raises confidence the fix preserved behavior via a back-to-back consistency replay (agreement on the generated tests, not a proof of equivalence). Do NOT use for running test generation, design error detection, or requirement verification themselves — only for making a model compatible so those can proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。