161 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze historical VS Code GitHub Copilot Chat sessions by model, reasoning effort, AIU, time, reliability, workflow behavior, and external quality evidence, or safely prune workspace-scoped local chat history by age. Use for session analysis, repeated-task retrospectives, model evaluation, cost/performance analysis, and old session cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
任务结束后的统一复盘入口，同时覆盖「修改」（识别并修复 B/K 对象缺陷）和「沉淀」（将新经验/洞见写入对应 B/K 对象）两个方向。主分类轴：B-object（Skill/Rule/Agent）vs K-object（原则/框架/规范/项目规格/碎片），操作类型：modify（修改已有）或 create（新建沉淀）。触发词：「复盘一下」「做个复盘」「这次踩坑了」「这个经验值得记」「跑通了」「总结经验」「沉淀一下」「记录一下这次」。注意：项目级批量复盘请触发 project-retrospective。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
项目收尾检查。在项目完成后、再次打开前执行：多角色文档审查 + 追踪台核查 + 遗留事项清点，输出收尾报告。与 project-retrospective 的区别：本 Skill 检查文档一致性和遗留问题，后者更新 Skill 体系。触发词：「项目收尾」「收尾检查」「确保文档自洽」。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
项目级 Skill 批量复盘。在一个项目/任务闭环完成后，主动扫描本次对话中调用过的所有 Skill，逐个判断是否需要新建或更新，批量调用 skill-capture-closure 完成沉淀，最后输出复盘报告。触发词：「项目做完了」「更新一下Skill」「基于刚刚的过程更新规范」「做个项目复盘」「沉淀一下经验」「把这次的经验记下来」。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a session retrospective that surfaces context-management gaps and routes them to approved follow-up actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstructs the development cycle from git history, distills sequential/parallel patterns, and produces actionable insights for improving future iterations. Triggers: recall, retrospective, development analysis, what happened, dev cycle analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize sprint retrospective notes into categorized action items and patterns. Use this skill when: - You have sprint retro notes (raw text, meeting transcript, or structured notes) to process - You need to identify recurring patterns across multiple retros - You want categorized action items with owners and deadlines from retro discussions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture learnings from a campaign, launch, sprint, or initiative using Five Whys (Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System) for root cause analysis and Start-Stop-Continue for action planning. Append reusable insights to knowledge/learnings.md so future runs of the OS get smarter. Use when the user asks for a retro, retrospective, post-mortem, "what did we learn", "campaign wrap-up", "lessons learned", or after a campaign or launch ends. Critical feedback loop that makes the OS compound over time. For the numbers review itself, see kpi-review. For planning the next campaign, see campaign-brief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliberate session retrospective — look back over what you just did, distill the durable, reusable lessons (not session trivia), and write them to the learnings memory namespace, deduped against what is already stored. Use at the END of a meaningful chunk of work to capture high-signal lessons worth keeping long-term. The curated counterpart to moflo's passive session-continuity capture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI Agile/Scrum Coach — sprint ceremony, velocity tracking, retrospective, team coaching รองรับทีม dev + non-dev
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project plan ครบ — WBS, Gantt, sprint, retrospective, RAID log, stakeholder communication
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Session retrospective. Runs after a workflow, coding session, or multi-step task completes. Analyzes what shipped, what failed, patterns observed, and growth opportunities. Generates a retro summary with per-step breakdowns, shipping streaks, and test health trends. Use after any significant session (>3 steps or >15 min). Proactively suggest when the user finishes a workflow, completes a feature, or says "let's review what we did." Also supports global retro across all projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly engineering retrospective from commit history, work patterns, and code-quality metrics, with trend tracking and per-person breakdown. NOT for per-session reflection (mk:memory / Phase 6).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JSON-canonical session memory in .meowkit/memory (Markdown is a generated view). Capture learnings, patterns, costs; loads at Orient, persists at Reflect. NOT for retrospectives (mk:retro).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JSON-canonical session memory. Use when capturing session learnings, extracting patterns, or tracking costs — persists to .meowkit/memory JSON stores; matching Markdown files are generated views. Activates during Phase 0 (Orient) to load context and Phase 6 (Reflect) to persist it. NOT for weekly-cadence engineering retrospectives (see mk:retro); NOT for arbitrary file storage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a session retrospective that surfaces context-management gaps and routes them to approved follow-up actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack retrospective method for completed workstreams, identifying what worked, what failed, process changes, and role-skill improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex adapter for Garry Tan's full gstack methodology across CEO/product pressure, CTO architecture, design, engineering, QA, security, shipping, documentation, and retrospectives. Use when the 总控/CEO or 架构/CTO role needs gstack method routing, implementation-plan hardening, or the user says gstack should help a role.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。