789 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
App Store プレビュー動画を Remotion (React) で生成する Agent Team スキル。 video-director が構成を設計し、script-writer がナレーション台本を作成し、 motion-designer が Remotion コードを実装し、preview-reviewer がコードレビューし、 frame-inspector がレンダリング結果を目視検証する。 Use when: App Store プレビュー動画を作りたい、アプリのプロモーション動画を作りたい、 Remotion で動画を生成したい。 Triggers: "プレビュー動画", "App Store 動画", "アプリ動画", "preview movie", "Remotion", "動画作成", "app preview"
App Store / Google Play 用のプロモーションスクリーンショットを Pencil (.pen) で生成する Agent Team スキル。creative-director が戦略を立て、screenshot-designer が Pencil で デザインを構築し、copy-writer がコピーを提供し、spec-validator が技術仕様を数値検証し、 quality-reviewer が最終品質を確認する。5エージェント体制で高品質なスクリーンショットを生成。 Use when: App Store スクリーンショットを作りたい、プロモーション画像を作成したい、 スクショのデザインをしたい。 Triggers: "スクリーンショット作成", "App Store 画像", "プロモーションスクショ", "screenshot creator", "スクショ作って", "App Store 素材"
Chrome で表示中の Web 画面を Pencil (.pen) ファイルに高精度で再現する Agent Team スキル。 3つの専門エージェント（screen-analyzer, design-builder, quality-reviewer）が 分析→構築→品質検証のサイクルを回し、忠実な画面再現を実現する。 Use when: Pencil で再現して、画面を Pencil に写して、Chrome を Pencil にコピー、 pencil-replicate、デザインをキャプチャ、UI を Pencil に
Run the Codex Optimized Development, Evaluation, and Remediation (CODER) Loop with an orchestration-only coordinator, non-overlapping task-family owners, fresh independent reviewers, evidence-scoped remediation, and final coordinator acceptance. Discover and compose optional MSW, Timebox, MSL, and Codex Voice Optimizer companions as the Slopware Dev Stack without making them dependencies. Use in Codex when the user invokes the CODER Loop, asks to divide a complex change into bounded implementation families with independent reviewers, requests multi-agent implementation without overlapping ownership, requires review and repair until every blocking gap is independently rechecked, asks for the CODER tutorial or Slopware Dev Stack, or wants CODER to install or use its companions. Do not trigger for an ordinary single-agent change, a review-only request, or a non-Codex host.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI performance review assistance systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-performance-reviewer related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `security-reviewer` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `code-reviewer` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning, drafting, revising, compressing, or auditing conference rebuttals and author responses in OpenReview Markdown or PDF. Supports exact reviewer mapping, evidence and experiment integration, guided risk decisions, venue-format validation, and blind reviewer/AC audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and resolve PR review comments on the current branch's PR in this Flutter repository, from both AI reviewers (CodeRabbit, CodiumAI, CodePilot, Copilot, etc.) and human reviewers. Fetches comments via `gh`, splits them into AI and human groups, verifies each comment against the actual Flutter code, triages them, proposes fixes, and optionally applies fixes, replies to comments, and pushes. Use when the user asks to review PR comments, resolve PR feedback, review AI comments, review human review comments, or handle code review feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep code review - Elixir idioms, Phoenix patterns, architecture, safety. Launches 3 parallel reviewers + plan-reviewer gate. Use when: review, review this, code review, check this code, review my changes, is this good, what do you think, code smells.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an adversarial two-phase code review of a change with TWO independent reviewers — Claude and Codex — who review alone, then cross-examine each other's findings, then Claude synthesizes a single weighted verdict. Use when the user says "/adversarial-review", "adversarial review", "review this with Codex", "get Codex to review", "two-reviewer review", "cross-examine this PR", or wants a second independent model to grade a change before merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. Tells the main thread WHEN to spawn `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit), or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of doing the work inline or using vanilla `Explore`. Subagent output is caveman-compressed so the tool-result injected back into main context is ~60% smaller — main context lasts longer across long sessions. Trigger: "delegate to subagent", "use cavecrew", "spawn investigator/builder/reviewer", "save context", "compressed agent output".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a finished piece from human-written fragments via an orchestrated two-loop pipeline - an assembly loop (assembler + cold reviewer) that sequences the fragments into a draft, then a polish loop (polisher + cold reviewer), then frequency analysis and a catalog-deslop pass with a regression gate. Two modes with opposite fidelity contracts - stitch mode preserves the author's exact wording, narrative mode preserves every idea but may rewrite freely. Use when the user says "mosaic", "assemble my fragments", "stitch these notes into a post", or provides a fragments file to turn into a finished piece. For writing from a topic with research, use article-factory; for prose from scratch, use the prose skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviewer rejection workflow and strict lockout semantics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal skill reviewer: SKILL mode (D1-D9 + M1-M5) or COMMAND mode (skill review)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Worker-Reviewer iterative pipeline for quality-critical code with review cycles
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opus-reviewer(Opusモデル、read-only)にレビューさせ、各指摘を実コードで検証して修正/反証/受容/保留に仕分け、再レビューを反復する。未解決ゼロ・千日手・要ユーザー判断のいずれかで終了。Opusモデルでコードレビューを回したいときに使う。
fable-reviewer(Fableモデル、read-only)にレビューさせ、各指摘を実コードで検証して修正/反証/受容/保留に仕分け、再レビューを反復する。未解決ゼロ・千日手・要ユーザー判断のいずれかで終了。Fableモデルでコードレビューを回したいときに使う。
Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convex code reviewer — security, auth, validators, performance, and pattern checks for code in a convex/ directory. Use to review or audit Convex functions before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convex code reviewer — security, auth, validators, performance, and pattern checks for code in a convex/ directory. Use to review or audit Convex functions before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。