「solutions」の検索結果

Use this skill when stuck in circular debugging, when solutions aren't working despite multiple attempts, or when the user expresses frustration with lack of progress. Bring in GPT-5 as a third-party consultant to provide fresh perspective on complex technical problems, architectural decisions, or multi-system debugging issues. Ideal when you've tried multiple approaches without success, when the problem involves obscure edge cases or novel challenges, or when a second expert opinion would help break through an impasse. Gather all context from the conversation so far and present it comprehensively to GPT-5.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers that pass linting. Use when user wants to scaffold exercises, create exercise stubs, or set up a new course section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query. Use when setting up global state, managing server state, or choosing between state management solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides a structured 8-phase workflow for resolving GitHub issues in Claude Code. Covers fetching issue details, analyzing requirements, implementing solutions, verifying correctness, performing code review, committing changes, and creating pull requests. Use when user asks to resolve, implement, work on, fix, or close a GitHub issue, or references an issue URL or number for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze BIM clash detection results and suggest resolutions. Prioritize clashes, identify patterns, assign responsibility, and track resolution status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies TRIZ cross-domain analogical reasoning to find solutions from adjacent fields. Use when stuck on a problem and needing inventive perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master modern Angular state management with Signals, NgRx, and RxJS. Use when setting up global state, managing component stores, choosing between state solutions, or migrating from legacy patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临考复习教练 / Exam cram coach. 学生给一个课程资料文件夹（课件 PDF/PPTX/DOCX/笔记/作业/答案/真题/往年卷），它按章节讲解并标出处、把讲义和题目里的图裁出来展示、只用资料里的题考试判分、记错题和笔记、按天排复习计划、做小抄，并标明每句话是否来自资料。触发词：期末、期中、考试、备考、复习、突击、刷题、真题、作业讲解、错题本、划重点、小抄、复习计划、考研、考证、课件讲解、讲义。Use when a student wants to prepare for a final, midterm or any exam from their own course files: teach chapter by chapter with page citations and the figures cropped from the materials, quiz only from the homework and past papers, keep progress, mistakes and notes across chats, plan the remaining days, build a cheat sheet, and label what comes from the materials. Triggers: exam prep, cram, revise, study for the test, lecture slides, homework solutions, past papers, practice questions, quiz me, mistake log, cheat sheet, study plan, study guide, flashcards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source royalty-free images and videos from Pexels API for design, placeholders, or content. Supports search, curated/popular content, collections, multiple resolutions, and ALWAYS creates detailed sidecar metadata files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the bioengineering, mechanobiology, and lymphatic transport reasoning of J. Brandon Dixon, professor of mechanical and biomedical engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. Reach for this skill whenever analyzing lymphatic biomechanics, active vessel contractility versus passive drainage, peristaltic fluid transport, microfluidic organ-on-a-chip design, preclinical lymphedema models, non-invasive functional imaging, targeted nanomedicine delivery, or automated disease staging. Use this skill to critique bioengineering assumptions, guide quantitative protocol design, evaluate biomechanical pump failure, and formulate interdisciplinary biomedical solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase debugging framework that ensures root cause investigation before attempting fixes. Never jump to solutions. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search past Claude Code sessions to recall commands, solutions, and context from prior conversations. TRIGGER on 'remember when', 'last time', 'we did this before', 'how did we', or /woz-recall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantically search past Claude Code sessions to recall commands, solutions, and context from prior conversations. TRIGGER on 'remember when', 'last time', 'we did this before', 'how did we', or /woz-recall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture high-quality screenshots of any public URL at custom resolutions. Supports desktop and mobile viewports, full-page captures, and specific element targeting. Ideal for visual monitoring, design research, and content archival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a learner asks for help with MATLAB homework, labs, projects, graded assignments, take-home exams, quizzes, or any programming task where academic integrity, course policy, or instructor constraints may limit direct solutions. Use to provide policy-aware hints, conceptual coaching, partial feedback, and assignment-safe MATLAB tutoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers that pass linting. Use when user wants to scaffold exercises, create exercise stubs, or set up a new course section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make technology decisions for every product capability by discovering existing assets, evaluating vendor-aligned options, and categorizing as Reuse/Extend/Build/Buy/Integrate/Research during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on "tech stack", "build or buy?", "what technologies?", "technical decisions", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "vendor constraint", "IBM-first", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions", "select tech stack". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and cross-references. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine technologies needed to build the product, making build/buy/integrate decisions during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on requests to select tech stack, evaluate technologies, make build vs. buy decisions, discover existing assets, or when user asks "what technologies?", "select tech stack", "build or buy?", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "technical decisions", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and trade-offs. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in Ethereum L2 solutions - Optimism, Arbitrum, zkSync, Base, and rollup architecture for scalable dApp developmentUse when "layer 2, l2, optimism, arbitrum, zksync, base, rollup, op stack, scaling, layer2, optimism, arbitrum, zksync, base, rollup, scaling, ethereum" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrating local LLMs into Godot games using NobodyWho and other Godot-native solutionsUse when "godot llm, nobodywho, godot ai npc, gdscript llm, godot local llm, godot chatgpt, godot 4 ai, godot, llm, nobodywho, gdscript, game-ai, npc, local-llm" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in course platform selection and implementation - comparing Teachable, Kajabi, Thinkific, and custom solutions. Covers LMS selection criteria, platform migrations, tech stack decisions, and building vs buying. Use when "course platform, lms, teachable, kajabi, thinkific, course hosting, learning management system, which platform, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。